News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Climate deal failure could cause tariff war: Garnaut 

Climate deal failure could cause tariff war: Garnaut

24 Mar, 2009 03:56 AM
The head of the Federal Government's climate change review, Ross Garnaut, has warned that Australia is likely to face a world tariff war driven by Europe and the US over greenhouse gas emissions unless there is a strong global agreement to prevent climate change.

"We've had the Energy Secretary in the United States speaking favourably about additional import duties on products from countries that aren't doing enough on climate change. That echoes a very strong sentiment from the US Congress," said Professor Garnaut at the Greenhouse 2009 conference in Perth yesterday.

"The problem is if every country goes through its own processes to develop protective mechanisms we'll get a race to the bottom."

This would damage the trade system and the fight against climate change.

Professor Garnaut issued his warning as the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, was on his way to Washington to meet the President, Barack Obama, to discuss the global financial crisis and climate change.

Professor Garnaut said Australia, with its big polluting exports such as aluminium and coal, would find a tariff war over climate change very difficult.

His comments come as the Government finds itself under attack from all sides over its climate change policy, the carbon pollution reduction scheme.

As industry hardens its opposition and increases calls for more compensation, it appears likely the scheme might not be passed before global climate talks begin in Copenhagen in December.

Professor Garnaut said such a defeat would create big difficulties for Australia.

He criticised lobby groups and politicians who, he said, were making ignorant statements about climate change policy.

He said the debate in Australia had recently been disproportionately claimed by "the private interest, the ignorant, the myopic and the excessive".

Asked to explain whom he meant, Professor Garnaut said: "There is no need to name names. One can recognise ignorance when one sees it. This is a complex issue and people need to invest some time and intellectual effort in understanding it."

He told the conference of about 500 scientists, industry figures and policymakers the financial crisis had made the politics of acting on climate change much more difficult as industry stepped up its opposition and concerns grew about the market's ability to cut greenhouse gas emissions through trading.

But the global slowdown had also cut emissions, Professor Garnaut said, which would give the world a few years' respite.

But because emissions were coming off a very high base, they would continue to rise "at a considerable rate", he said.

Professor Garnaut said Australia should support an emissions trading scheme starting in 2010, putting him at odds with the call by the Opposition Leader, Malcolm Turnbull, to delay the scheme until 2012.

But he warned against giving unlimited protection to the highest polluting export industries, saying it would force Europe and the US to do the same.

The conference will hear from scientists giving the latest Australian research on the impact of climate change on agriculture, human health and coastal communities from rising temperatures, lower rainfall, higher bushfire risk and rising sea levels.

Of acute concern is whether the El Nino weather pattern which brings drought to south-eastern Australia may become permanent.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The cab pulled up with a jerk....the jerk got out.
Posted by micko, 24/03/2009 4:05:59 PM
Those that push the man-made climate change agenda ignore the inconvenient rainfall and temperature data that blows their agenda push out of the water. Why is that? Climate trends for the last 20, 30, 40, 50 years can't be the baseline they base their arguements on. The data studied must be for as far back as daily and annual temp and rainfall records reach. Then that data has to be broken up into 10 and 50 year blocks. That is when you'll see the true trends. And they don't favour the man-made climate change push.
Posted by Brindi, 24/03/2009 5:41:34 PM
It’s a little to late for Professor Garnaut, the head of Lihir Gold, to be now arguing the consequences of his master plan. The master plan, under full disclosure, should have factored in any and all potential, or real, country-busting problems instead of going ahead with the hot-off-the-press glossy prospectus aimed at winning over the alarmed populist investor.
Posted by Dr Bob, 25/03/2009 6:32:41 AM
Garnaut is pushing his alarmist agenda. Man can't do anything about the Sun and its effects on climate.
Posted by Len, 25/03/2009 8:55:45 AM
Garnaut is now about to try and stuff up the rest of agricultural Australia, plus all the export industries, such as coal, that keep the wheels of Australia turning.

How can we sell and trade fresh air ? How will this change the climate - if that's what he and all the rest of the "brains" think about carbon trading's effect on climate change will achieve?

Banning all cars from the road might have the same effect but I don't hear him advocating this. Does he think he is god, who, along with mother nature, is the only thing that will change the weather.

Posted by woolman, 25/03/2009 4:27:27 PM
Garnaut is wrong. The US is right. Exports need to receive full carbon tax credit and imports need to be charged the carbon tax equivalent.

The carbon taxes or equivalent must be treated the same as GST - or we will not have any exporters.

Posted by terry, 25/03/2009 5:14:11 PM
I also recognise ignorance when I see it. In the past, the world has seen many periods of global warming with ice ages in between.

Australia has a couple coal seams over 100 metres thick. It takes about 7 feet of vegetation to make 1 foot of coal. Where do you people think the carbon came from in this process?

Posted by jaimie, 26/03/2009 1:21:11 AM
Climate change depends upon things such as tilt of the earth's axis, distance from the sun, and solar radiation. Regular cycles between ice ages and tropical periods are measured in thousands of years, not a decade or two.
Posted by jaimie, 26/03/2009 1:32:45 AM
Complete and utter nonsence. Climate change is measured in thousands or hundreds of thousands of years
Posted by jaimie, 26/03/2009 1:39:31 AM
Oh, yes we can, Len. Remember the roos? The good Prof proposed that we all keep roos in the paddock instead of methane generating cattle and sheep.

His comment about needing time and intellectual effort to understand what he was alluding to is a bit rich coming from an economist.

First it was roos in the paddock, now it's bats in the belfry!

Posted by Roger Crook, 26/03/2009 4:58:01 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Professor Ross Garnaut
Professor Ross Garnaut
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
23 March, 2009
22 March, 2009
19 March, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you believe rural property prices will continue to rise despite the economic downturn?

Yes
(38.6%)

No
(54.9%)

Undecided
(6.5%)

Total Votes: 603
Poll Date: 22 March, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...