News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 El Niño back to spoil recovery 

El Niño back to spoil recovery

03 Jun, 2009 12:21 PM
Just when much of eastern Australia looked to breaking the shackles of drought, there is now an increased risk of an El Niño event occurring this year, according to the latest forecasts from the Bureau of Meteorology.

Dr David Jones, Head of Climate Analysis at the Bureau's National Climate Centre, said that if recent trends in Pacific climate patterns were to be maintained, an El Niño event would be established by mid-winter.

"This view is supported by several computer forecasts of El Niño, which have firmed in their predictions of an event in 2009," Dr Jones said.

The odds of an El Niño are now thought to be above 50 per cent, which is more than double the normal risk of an El Niño in any year.

According to the Bureau, the surface of the equatorial Pacific currently stands at around 0.5°C warmer than normal, while the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) dropped from +9 in April to -5 in May.

During a typical El Niño event, central equatorial Pacific Ocean temperatures are at least 0.8°C warmer than normal for around four to six months during which time the SOI persists at values –7 or lower.

The Pacific easterly Trade Winds were also suppressed in May.

The Bureau says that historically the main impacts from El Niño events usually occur in the second half of the year.

During this period eastern, northern and parts of southern Australia face an increased risk of below-average rainfall and above-average daytime temperatures.

El Niño events are frequently associated with drought, as in the recent 2002 and 2006 El Niño events when rainfall deficiencies were widespread and severe.

However, the Bureau says it is possible for timely falls of rain to limit the worst effects to relatively small areas, as happened during the intense 1997 El Niño event.

"While there is an underlying tendency for El Niño events to be drier than normal, the detailed impacts of each El Niño are different," the Bureau said.

"However, it's still possible that the recent trends may stall without El Niño thresholds being reached. Such an outcome, however, may still bias the outlook towards drier than average conditions, especially if the SOI remains negative."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Ho hum...the real influence on SE Australian rainfall is the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD). Why aren't we reporting more on it?
Posted by phil, 4/06/2009 6:08:39 AM
What a load of crap! BOM cannot even get tomorrow's forecast right. For years now we have been in drought and according to BOM there has been El Nino, La Nina and neither during those years. These terms are used by the BOM to say they do not have a clue and need to justify their massive budget.

A leading forecaster told a group of farmers a few years ago to "Go home and fuel your tractors and get ready for a great year of cropping with plenty of rain". The drought has continued since and his prediction cost growers a lot of money and mental stress.

Two birds in a tree could do a better job for far less money. Spend some of the money on a weather radar at Cobar and we could do our own predictions?

Posted by Fred, 4/06/2009 6:17:06 AM
While I have shaken my head at some on the BOM's forecasts (like having a forcast released for dry and sunny, then 10 minutes later having a severe thunderstorm warning for flash flooding), most mistakes are made by people who misinterperate the information that BOM releases.
Posted by pete, 4/06/2009 8:59:24 AM
Don't think so, Phil. The real cause is smoke plumes over Indonesia caused by burning off peat rain forest which are being replaced with palm oil trees, plus an increase in vocanic avctivity in and around the area.

Refer to the Farmonline story of research scientist Keith Potts around Feb/March 2008. Apparently, it's also having some effect on the IOD.

Time will tell and that's whats so frustrating...gaining agreement from everyone else.

Posted by Will, 4/06/2009 4:18:53 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
02 June, 2009
01 June, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you support the recommendation to maintain the national beef levy at $5 per head sold?

Yes
(39.2%)

No
(51.6%)

Undecided
(9.2%)

Total Votes: 697
Poll Date: 31 May, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...