News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Garrett's new plan to protect ecosystems 

Garrett's new plan to protect ecosystems

02 Jun, 2009 03:55 AM
THE Federal Government will mandate key protection targets for the Australian environment under a new strategy for national conservation reserves to be released today.

Environment Minister Peter Garrett will seek to protect "examples" of at least 80 per cent of Australia's native ecosystems by 2030. This will include action to make parts of Australia's biodiversity "climate change resilient".

The strategy will include national parks such as Kakadu, plus other publicly protected land, private land set aside for conservation and indigenous protected areas, covering 11 per cent of the continent.

Mr Garrett will require the states and territories to develop five-year plans by next year to reach the 2030 target. They will have to report every two years on their progress.

The scheme will also encourage some private landholders to use all or part of their property for conservation.

The report says the new strategy will employ a variety of measures, "including acquisition by governments and the development of covenants, incentives, contracts and conservation agreements to establish new protected areas".

Director-general of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Julia Marton-Lefevre, said the strategy was a major step forward in protecting Australia's biodiversity.

Meanwhile, business groups are pushing the Opposition to broker a deal with the Government on emissions trading despite deep divisions within the Coalition on the issue.

The Business Council of Australia is privately warning the Liberal Party that if it doesn't win further assistance for the electricity sector, the industry will be endangered.

And the Australian Industry Group chief executive Heather Ridout has told The Age that the Opposition should return to the negotiating table and pass the legislation to ensure business certainty.

The Coalition has proposed a delay to the vote on emissions trading legislation until after December climate negotiations in Copenhagen.

"We are likely to see the full details of an international deal to be debated long after Copenhagen, and we could see the Coalition continue to use that to delay and delay a vote on the legislation," Ms Ridout said yesterday.

"We urge the Coalition to work with the Government to ensure the best deal for business and pass the legislation this year."

Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull is facing a division in the ranks of the Coalition, with the National Party and up to half the Liberal MPs cold on emissions trading.

The Government has indicated it will now look towards the cross-benchers for support.

The Greens are prepared to compromise on aspects of their position, but only after the Government commits to its 2020 emissions reduction target rising to 40 per cent if a global agreement is reached. The Government has proposed a range of 5 to 25 per cent by 2020 on 2000 levels, depending on an international outcome, which the Opposition supports.

Climate Change Minister Penny Wong has called Greens leader Bob Brown to arrange a meeting, and other meetings are likely next week with independent senator Nick Xenophon and Family First senator Steve Fielding.

On ABC radio yesterday, Senator Wong said the door was still ajar for the Coalition to negotiate with the Government.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Does this now mean that Mr Garrett and his leftist mates in the State Labor Governments are now going to start recognising and commit to the re-establishment of the equity and title of the private landowner under some form of due process ?
Posted by Dr Bob, 2/06/2009 8:30:16 AM
Yes Please Mr Garrett. I own some wonderful scrub with a bit of cleared land and with the State Government's removal of reasonable access to water on the same property it's no good to me anymore as agricultural land (the reason I purchased it). So please bring your cheque book around as soon as you can.
Posted by John Michelmore, 2/06/2009 1:14:41 PM
Creating national parks and other protected areas may sound like a good thing thing to do in protecting endangered species and ecosystems but it is completely fallacious. It only takes one disaster like a major bush fire or a flood to wipe out an endangered species. Outside the national park there may not be any of the endangered species in existence such as Wollemi Pine. Collection of seed to propagate and commercialise these species will ensure that there is a resevoir of these endangered species to fall back on. This has happened with both the Wollemi Pine and the Foxtail Palm which are now scattered throughout the world. Commercialisation of endangered species ensures survival. These lessons can be applied quite widely. For instance, commercialisation of Galahs and White Cockatoos would bring in a large income to graingrowers and other landholders. Of course, it would have to be regulated so that a species wasn't wiped out in Australia and only exist overseas. This could be done by simply making it conditional that there should be releases back to the wild of some breeding stock to ensure local sustainability of the wild stock.

The Labor Govt has successfully ensured that valuable rainforest species of timber trees cannot be grown in plantations by locking up tropical rainforests in national parks and forbidding the collection of seed there. If they are going to propose covenants, contracts and conservation agreements, they had better have deep pockets to reimburse the landowner for loss of access to his own land and loss of production.

Posted by Trugger, 2/06/2009 2:04:39 PM
God what a cocky bastard if he thinks we are going to vote Labor until 2030 - he is kidding himself. We can't afford it! We have plenty of National Parkes and a TSR system that covers a lot of the east coast. If we are going to blow more money on trinkets for this government, we best kick them out now. This country can't afford to go around borrowing and spending anymore. I am part of the next generation of Australians and Peter Penny and Kevin, I don't like debt and I don't want a whole lot of hollow assets thankyou very much. Pull your head in Garrett these are tough times for everyone, let's get back on track, back in the black, then you can have your little trinkets like more national parks and Penny can go and waste some more money on water that dosen't exist.
Posted by Sam, 3/06/2009 5:51:14 AM
This lock up mentality shows a complete lack of understanding of the ecological process. The inclusion of appropriate grazing systems are an integral part of managing healthy soils. There will be much-reduced soil carbon sequencing if we don't have functioning healthy soils systems. Please Mr Garrett listen to some of the scientist and landholders who have been working on building natural capital through the promotion of appropriate grazing systems.
Posted by concerned, 3/06/2009 6:19:56 AM
What a sinister photo Peter. It matches your politics perfectly. No sign of a reflection or halo around the chromed dome. Just blackened dead branches. How about a smile and a bit of love shown for the rich land we are blessed with. Rich in the ablility to produce food and clothing and housing for our people and more to share around the world. Please learn to love people and not sinister blackened trees before it is too late Peter. Why is private land being set aside for conservation? Tax incentives? More Southern Corp? We cannot afford or manage properly the government land set aside on our behalf! Please repent and start sowing food and fibre for people again. God will take care of the birds and wild animals as He always has.
Posted by Common Cents, 3/06/2009 7:35:13 AM
We own nearly 570ha of native vegetation. It has been identified by scientists as having high level conservation values and is part of an important wildlife corridor. We have held it for nearly 40 years, subdividing would bring in big money but severly damage its environmental integrity. Will this new scheme help us financialy?
Posted by Charlotte, 4/06/2009 12:34:02 PM
We own nearly 570ha of native vegetation. It has been identified by scientists as having high level conservation values and is part of an important wildlife corridor. We have held it for nearly 40 years, subdividing would bring in big money but severly damage its environmental integrity.

Will this new scheme help us financialy?

Posted by Charlotte, 4/06/2009 12:34:04 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Environment Minister Peter Garrett.
Environment Minister Peter Garrett.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
01 June, 2009
29 May, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you support the recommendation to maintain the national beef levy at $5 per head sold?

Yes
(39.2%)

No
(51.6%)

Undecided
(9.2%)

Total Votes: 697
Poll Date: 31 May, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...