News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Green products facing a black future: study 

Green products facing a black future: study

20 Jan, 2009 03:49 AM
Shrinking family budgets and growing scepticism about environmental claims made by companies are set to hit sales of green products, researchers say.

Environmentally friendly products and services are often more expensive than conventional lines and could be the first to go as families review their household budgets, they say.

Research has found that concern over the environment is not translating into sales, and is less likely to do so as consumers worry about how the deteriorating economy will affect them.

Being environmentally responsible was one of the least important drivers, according to the findings of a survey of 800 people by Blue Marlin, a design agency.

Even among self-styled green consumers, only a small proportion are motivated by environmental product claims.

Overall, two thirds of respondents said environmentally friendly products were overpriced, rising to 72pc among families with children.

The head of strategy at Blue Marlin, John Matthews, said shoppers bought green products only if they delivered "tangible benefits".

"Saving the environment is a happy outcome, but it's not the primary driver," he said.

He said many products failed to persuade shoppers of these benefits and instead had relied upon their emotional commitment to the "green movement".

"It's not enough to rely on the faith of consumers.

"Brands can't demand action from consumers, but they can help [them] to act.

"If a brand tells you you are going to hell if you don't buy it, then they probably won't buy it."

Mr Matthews said calls to his agency from companies looking to incorporate carbon offset logos or environmental claims on packaging had dried up.

Late last year another company, Mobium Research, which tracks attitudes of 1700 consumers, found that the number of people who said they were willing to pay a 25pc premium for a product that was "made in an environmentally friendly manner" had fallen from half in 2007 to a third.

It also found that almost nine in 10 consumers distrusted green claims.

Annual spending on green-leaning products is forecast to top $22 billion by 2010.

Australia's largest retailer of green products and services, Neco said it had yet to witness a sales slump.

Its managing director, Julian Smith said he was planning for growth this year, and had just opened a superstore in Melbourne with one planned for Sydney.

"Green products have a good message to sell … products like solar panels and water tanks can save you money over time.

"We are putting out the message that you can save money and be green."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I wouldn't buy any product proclaiming to be green simply because I'm totally sick of hearing and reading all the pathetic enviromental claims made by companies. Most of these products are no different to what they used to be, but they have all somehow had a green spin put on them. Just like windfarms, electric cars, and just about anything with green credentials, most of them are fake when you look a bit deeper.
Posted by phil, 20/01/2009 4:51:44 PM
Have you ever stopped and watched people in supermarkets? Believe me people do not care what country a product comes from or whether it is environmentally friendly or even whether it is GM. The media whips up all this frenzy and the environmentalists get the media attention. But they are not the majoritory of people, who just do not care or who do not have a media voice. Wake up world. The less money people have, the more they will go for cheap not healthy.
Posted by Diane, 21/01/2009 5:02:34 AM
There is certainly a fair bit of sceptisism on both sides but does this article mean that we should open the flood gates to mass production and forget about the environment because no-one cares? I really don't think so. I would be more sceptical about those trying to mess with the environment than those trying to help revive and protect it. Buy as clean and green as financially possible as it has to be having some effect to not only the environment but your own families health as well. The two headed fish in the Noosa river may be a sign that nature and the environment is not happy with what we are doing.
Posted by themule, 21/01/2009 6:08:54 AM
It is not necessarily more expensive to farm sustainably - the additional cost is in the record keeping and auditing leading to accreditation that can be trusted. Consumers are rightly sceptical of claims of 'green' when there is little substance behind the label.
Posted by Bruce, 21/01/2009 7:50:03 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Should Nationals Senator Barnaby Joyce try a move to the House of Representatives at the next Federal election?

Yes
(51.8%)

No
(42.1%)

Other
(6.1%)

Total Votes: 444
Poll Date: 18 January, 2009

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...