News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Investors hit Woolies for $800m 

Investors hit Woolies for $800m

28 Jan, 2010 04:15 AM
INVESTORS have ignored Woolworths' ''never mind the width, feel the quality'' argument for its reduced first-half sales, stripping more than $800 million from the value of its shares.

The chief executive of the supermarkets, petrol and liquor giant, Michael Luscombe, took the unusual steps of reaffirming the group's profit guidance for the full year, and introducing a growth measure to show returns in the past two years, as he tried to persuade stockbroking analysts all was well.

He also took a sideways swipe at competitor Coles, saying German import Aldi was now its competitive-pricing benchmark in supermarkets, and warned that the June quarter could turn into a consumer paradise as retailers tried to beat last year's stimulus-inflated sales figures.

Woolworths' spin on its performance had little impact on an already skittish sharemarket - its shares closed near their day's low, down 68¢ at $26.80 - a fall that far exceeded the general market.

For the 27 weeks to January 3, Woolworths was able to lay claim to a 4.2 per cent increase in total sales to $27.2 billion - about an extra $4000 a minute through its cash registers for the half.

The percentage sales growth was, however, half the gains it recorded last year when, as Mr Luscombe put it, ''we had all the moons aligned'' - lower petrol prices and interest rates, the Federal Government's stimulus cash for consumers and people choosing to shop for better quality, more expensive food over eating at restaurants.

Essentially, Woolworths' argument is that retail sales grew at unsustainable rates last year because of the stimulus package, and that a two-year growth rate comparison is more valid. On this argument, Woolies' two-year sales growth average was 6.5 per cent.

Mr Luscombe said the retail price of many goods had been static or fallen, which meant that even though Woolies could lay claim to more customers, many of whom bought more items each visit, the total value of their shopping was less - hence the limited increase in sales.

As official figures showed yesterday, the ''premiership'' quarter for retailers, December, saw inflation slow further.

On Woolies' own inflation measure (it uses a larger basket of goods than the Government), December was up 0.4 per cent compared with 5.3 per cent in 2008. For consumers this has meant, for example, a product such as milk dropping from $2.39 for a two-litre bottle, to $2.09.

Mr Luscombe asserted that Woolies' business structure was, however, capable of coping and that, excluding its petrol business, sales growth should be ''in the upper single digits'' for the full year.

More importantly for investors and analysts, ''earnings before interest and tax will continue to grow faster than sales [and] we also expect net profit … will grow in the range of 8 per cent to 11 per cent''.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Are we supposed to cry or feel sorry for them?? They have almost single handedly destroyed Australian rural and horticultural markets and then conned the Australian public into believing they support farmers and rural communities. Driven by greed and a desire to totally dominate the Australian retail market in every sector they have ignored Australian producers and manufacturers to source cheep overseas products. When one organisation owns Woolworths / Safeway, Dick Smiths, Tandy, Big W, WW Liquor, BWS, Dan Murphy, WW Petrol with Caltex, Langton’s, ALH Group (Hotels) and then there is their reward cards etc with a corporate attitude like theirs, it is only a matter of time before reality bites. They own more poker machines than any other organisation, their words of corporate responsibility to the community are not echoed by their actions. They deserve no sympathy, perhaps it is time that they suffered like so many others have as a consequence of dealings with them.
Posted by katandra, 29/01/2010 7:36:06 AM
This bloke Luscombe must live on another planet to the one I live on. Virtually nothing in Woolies has decreased in price in the last 12 months, and the price increases have been in the order of 20c and 30c per item at a time. It was recently reported locally, on how many shoppers are deserting the "biggies" to buy at smaller retailers, where the prices are lower. The day I see milk at $2.09 or even $2.39 in Woolies will be a dream day. I buy my milk from local small retailers, where it's anything up to $1.00 a 2L bottle cheaper than at Woolies. Luscombe forgot to mention the cool monopoly that Coles and Woolies now have on fuel too .. and how their fuel prices are rarely more than .5c apart, every day.
Posted by Ron N, 29/01/2010 7:50:22 AM
I certainly won't shed a tear for them. For the last month, they have been buying grey pumpkins at $0.20/kg and selling them at $2.49-$2.99/kg. I will not shop there or Coles. As Katandra said, they have ruined the hort business in Australia.
Posted by The orchardist, 29/01/2010 9:20:46 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: What is the biggest challenge currently facing Australian agriculture?

Animal activists
(9.6%)

Poor urban perceptions
(8.9%)

Red tape
(6.6%)

Low farmgate prices
(39.1%)

Carbon emissions policies
(10.6%)

Property rights
(15.6%)

Other
(9.5%)

Total Votes: 861
Poll Date: 24 January, 2010
BLOGS
20 January, 2010

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...