News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Monsanto ramps up Roundup production in US 

Monsanto ramps up Roundup production in US

08 Mar, 2010 10:49 AM
MONSANTO is expecting about 20 per cent more Roundup in the marketplace after a new production facility was brought online late last week.

Despite the increase in production, Roundup marketing manager Curt Uebele did not say whether a price decrease would follow.

"We'll always be at a slight premium over generics," he noted.

Mr Uebele added that in some comparison testing Monsanto performed last year among glyphosate products, Roundup performed 10pc better than China-manufactured alternatives and could result in 40pc more yield.

Monsanto also announced a new product that would be available this year: MON 63410, a post-emergent herbicide designed to be applied over the top of soybeans, before weeds emerge.

Uebele said tests had shown good control of tough weeds, such as palmer amaranth and waterhemp, using MON 63410 followed by a glyphosate application.

The active ingredient in MON 63410 is the organic compound metolachlor. Though it's not new in the marketplace, Uebele said Monsanto's new, proprietary encapsulation process offered additional crop safety for broadcast applications.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Yummy yummy a post-emergent herbicide designed to be applied over the top of soybeans, and roundup could result in 40pc more yield. Why not have a 50pc increase in POISON production and make life even more healthier. Has anyone ever thought the bugs and weeds are trying to tell us something about soil fecundity?
Posted by Richard Woolley, 9/03/2010 4:09:36 AM
This is just insane... I wonder if Monsanto is already preparing to the lawsuits to battle 20 years down the track? I'm sure we'll see the situation very similar to what has happened to asbestos and Hardy - everyone except small group of critics thought "what a great product, it does not cause any immediate harm and so useful" and it is used and abused everywhere ... And then - bang: "what a horrible thing" it is all over the place and huge money spent for clean ups and "victims" payouts. Would be much better to listen to concerned educated voices in first place and cut out any risks from the beginning.
Posted by Andrew, 9/03/2010 5:25:39 AM
Despite all the lies that GM food crops will result in less chemicals being used, it is plainly evident that these untested and dangerous crops use far more deadly chemicals than conventional counterparts. Not only do the crops use more toxic chemistry, but the resistant weeds that have resulted from the GM debacle (such as amaranth, pigweed and waterhemp) also require higher doses of this toxic crap. Monsanto is an appalling example of the sorry state of the world.
Posted by brett sanders, 9/03/2010 8:03:11 AM
Without farm chemicals there would be no zero-till or direct drill. That means with roundup we cultivate less, less burning of the fossil fuels, less soil compaction, more water efficiency, less erosion. All good things for the farm environment. Compared to the toxins in your own homes it like they say, bad things happen in-doors.
Posted by THE FARMER, 9/03/2010 1:14:59 PM
The Farmer, your comment, “All good things for the farm environment”, clearly demonstrates how naïve or totally ignorant you are as to the damage these toxic chemicals cause to your soil and to the environment. There are no excuses for being so ill informed with such simplistic explanations. Never have I seen a soil test result that identified a deficiency of these toxic chemicals. Weeds, insect pests and crop diseases certainly indicate poor soil agronomy advice or soil fertility management. You can retort with all the vitriol you like; there is no escaping the facts, toxic chemicals cause serious health and environmental damage.
Posted by ggwagga, 11/03/2010 11:54:42 AM
Ggwagga do you get that grasses and weeds need to be killed before a successful crop. Are you advocating more burning of fuel and increased cultivation and the associated problems that go with that?
Posted by THE FARMER, 14/03/2010 3:53:14 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Should the Federal Government step in and overhaul the corporate structure of Australian Wool Innovation?

Yes
(42.4%)

No
(43.3%)

Not yet
(14.3%)

Total Votes: 413
Poll Date: 07 March, 2010

Most popular articles


Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...