News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 New light on carbon footprint of irrigation 

New light on carbon footprint of irrigation

13 Nov, 2009 10:08 AM
IRRIGATORS need to think carefully about upgrading their systems in light of energy costs, according to the Irrigation Futures CRC.

Dr Tamara Jackson, a recent PhD graduate of CRC, found that converting from gravity feed surface irrigation to pressurised systems resulted in water savings of between 10 and 66 per cent—but the conversion could also lift energy consumption by up to 163 per cent.

“Where groundwater is used for irrigation, converting to pressurised micro-irrigation systems can save water and decrease energy use, as less water needs to be pumped,” said Dr Jackson.

“We found energy consumption dropped by up to 44 per cent in regions that use ground water for irrigation.”

“However, when surface water is used, pressurised systems increase energy consumption and carbon emissions substantially, so their use should be carefully considered in these areas.”

Ian Atkinson, CEO of the Irrigation Futures CRC, said that estimating the impact of future energy costs, including the likely cost of carbon, is critical to any on-farm irrigation investment decision.

“It’s not just about water savings,” Mr Atkinson said.

“Many of our inland irrigation regions use so-called inefficient irrigation methods like furrow irrigation.

"This study shows these systems still have a place in a world concerned with climate change and feeding millions more people each year.”

The study compared surface irrigation at Colleambally, NSW, with groundwater usage in south-eastern South Australia.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Another academic pandering to the global warming hoax. Carbon is beneficial to the crops under irrigation, the more the better.
Posted by Len, 16/11/2009 7:52:47 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
12 November, 2009
13 November, 2009
POLL
Q: Has the emissions trading debate changed your voting intentions?

More likely to vote Labor
(10.5%)

More likely to vote Coalition
(47.2%)

Less likely to vote Labor
(12%)

Less likely to vote Coalition
(3.2%)

No change
(21.8%)

Other
(5.4%)

Total Votes: 685
Poll Date: 08 November, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...