News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Organic farming and weight loss the money spinners in 2010 

Organic farming and weight loss the money spinners in 2010

06 Jan, 2010 11:59 AM
Australians are more likely to make money out of organic farming and weight-loss services in 2010 than by building townhouses and apartments, according to research on the latest industry trends.

Despite the prolonged effects of the drought, economic forecasters IBISWorld is predicting a bumper year for a number of agriculture-based businesses with sugar manufacturing and organic farming topping the list of growth industries for the year.

Revenue from sugar production is predicted to expand by 15.9 per cent to become a $3.11billion industry, while the much smaller organic farming industry is expected to grow by 14.8pc.

Not surprisingly, industries helped along by Federal Government spending such as the insulation industry and construction associated with schools are also predicted to have a good 2010.

IBISWorld general manager Robert Bryant said overall growth of 2.2pc was predicted for the Australian economy, a marked improvement on the doom and gloom of the previous 12 months.

Mr Bryant said increasing concern about the environment and personal health had thrown up several surprises from the survey results.

"While on average organic goods remain more expensive than non-organic produce, higher disposable incomes coupled with increasing awareness of environmental sustainability and an increase in the range of organic produce available will see continued growth in this industry," Mr Bryant said.

Wallaroo-based organic farmer Dave Pentony said he was not surprised by the results and has plans to expand his business and take on extra staff this year.

"We could grow a lot more, and we can sell everything we produce. The only thing holding us back is water," Mr Pentony said.

The property near Hall, ACT, now has 45 greenhouses for winter crops.

The lingering effects of the credit crunch and a reduction in the first home-owners grant meant the multi-apartment and townhouse construction sector was expected to suffer this year, with the industry expected to shrink by 5.2pc and employment to fall by 3.9pc.

Master Builders' Association's acting chief executive Richard Calver said the Government's stimulus measures had protected 50,000 construction jobs that would have been otherwise lost during the downturn.

"It's going to take some time for a turnaround and for a full recovery ... Even though builders are becoming more optimistic about where things are headed, the challenge is to overcome sluggish investor activity and the prospect of higher interest rates," Mr Calver said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
People was 'normal natural' food, not Genetically Modified (GM and GMO) foods, people have woken up to understand that most of the food in the supermarket today is GM (eg: soy, corn, wheat), and also people have now understood that the government has failed to correctly have Genetically Modified labelling on foods. We better wake up before your Monsanto's and the UN with their evil Codex Alimentarius takes over our soveriegnty, like the whole Global Warming scam is trying via Rudd's ETS.
Posted by Cath, 6/01/2010 2:28:28 PM
Cath not everything is a global conspiracy.
Posted by Wally, 7/01/2010 5:07:23 AM
There are no GM wheat products being sold anywhere in the world. Cath must be living in some alternate reality and reading too many Dan Brown novels. The viability and sustainability of Australian farming businesses, and not to mention global food security, would benefit from GM crops. Let's leave the conspiracy theories to pulp fiction.
Posted by Glenn Tong, 7/01/2010 5:57:15 AM
Glenn and Wally, Cath may be wrong about the wheat, but the viability and sustainability of Australian farming businesses, not to mention global food security, will NOT benefit from GM crops. GM is a short term profit making con. It may seem to be more productive for a while, believers will believe that they're helping to feed the starving masses, and initially the farmer may make a bit more $, but ultimately it'll come back to bite them all in the butt. Mark my words.
Posted by panick, 7/01/2010 7:36:49 AM
It's wonderful to see growth and profits coming through organic farming. Cath certainly had it right on the soy and corn; just add canola and cotton, and by now probably sugar sourced from the USA. Consumers don't want to eat GM, and in many ways organic is the only way they can be sure. The growing food values of Australians are very important, and should lead to a stalling in the dramatic growth in chronic health costs currently borne by the economy.
Posted by Madeleine Love, 7/01/2010 8:52:35 AM
What is organic produce? Surely all growing products are organic. Another term needs to be used to describe products produced without the need for GM or chemicals. Basically the term 'organic' is spin and the general public have swallowed it hook line and sinker! It's a bit like the clever marketing that produced 'kiwi fruit'.
Posted by Noel, 7/01/2010 9:03:47 AM
Hi Noel, On organics, look carefully on food packages for organic accreditation labels. You can follow it up by the ringing the accreditation, and go to the farms and see how the produce is being grown. Speaking to the farmers and hearing their production values is helpful.
Posted by Madeleine Love, 7/01/2010 9:46:42 AM
Noel, many words have double (or more) meanings... Perhaps what we should be doing is re-naming non-organic produce to something like Synthetic or Artificial or Contaminated Foods... Whadaya reckon? Perhaps then the public would get the picture? Most people are so far detached from the way their food is produced that they have no idea what contaminants are on/in their foods.
Posted by panick, 7/01/2010 9:50:46 AM
How funny, and yet government bodies such as CSIRO are failing to invest in organics as they do not see its value for the land, and consumers. Instead they prefer to be hoodwinked by Big Biotech lobbyists into investing in GM crops which nobody wants to eat! Ah! The mysteries of life.
Posted by Hebe, 7/01/2010 11:05:12 AM
It's a misconception that consumers do not want GM crops. When you take an international perspective, corn, soy, cotton and canola are predominantly GM crops. Why do you think farmers grow these crops? Because people buy them. In the US, even in a state like Kansas where wheat was traditionally the leading crop, corn acreage is increasing and wheat acreage is steadily declining. This points to the fact that farmers and their customers are voting with their feet in choosing to plant GM crops. The notion of lack of consumer acceptance for GM crops is a mirage promoted by the organic brigade and conspiracy theorists.
Posted by Glenn Tong, 7/01/2010 11:42:48 AM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
06 January, 2010
05 January, 2010
POLL
Q: Do you believe your farm business will turn a profit in 2010?

Definitely
(10.4%)

Probably
(16.2%)

Maybe
(17.8%)

Break even
(15.2%)

Probably make a loss
(40.4%)

Total Votes: 512
Poll Date: 04 January, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...