News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Scramble for food companies a warning of crisis to come 

Scramble for food companies a warning of crisis to come

03 Sep, 2010 06:48 AM
MUCH has been said about how BHP Billiton's bid for Potash Corporation and Canadian fertiliser company Agrium's play for AWB fit in with the growing issue of food security and food shortages.

These are just new chapters in developments that resulted in China's Bright Food Group trying to acquire Australia's CSR sugar this year and Sinochem's move to buy Australian agrichemicals operator Nufarm. Then there's Qatar-based Hassad Food, backed by the Qatar Investment Authority, buying up rural land in Australia to feed Qatar and other Middle East countries worried about food security. Hassad has bought more than $40 million worth of sheep stations in northern New South Wales and South Australia in the past six months.

The corporate activity is a storm warning of how food shortages and famine will reshape the world and corporate strategies.

The Economist notes that by 2050 world grain output will have to rise by half and meat production will need to double to meet demand at a time when growth in grain yields is flattening out, there is little extra farmland and renewable water is running short.

Similarly, rising food prices are a poke in the eye that the world needs to remind us of how fragile the food production chain has become. The drought and bushfires in Russia, combined with limits on grain exports, have resulted in a 70 per cent price spike in wheat futures, which has caused prices for soy and barley to go up by 10 per cent.

Global warming is getting the press, but some are now warning that the threat to the human race is a looming food shortage. This seems unimaginable in a world where there has been almost half a century of abundance.

But in his chilling book The Coming Famine, journalist and science writer Julian Cribb warns we are headed towards global food shortages in the next 40 years because of scarcities of water, good land, energy, nutrients, technology, fish and, significantly, stable climates. You can add to that population growth, consumer demand and protectionist trade policies.

"The coming famine is also complex, because it is driven not by one or two, or even half a dozen factors but rather by the confluence of many large and profoundly intractable causes that tend to amplify one another,'' Cribb writes. "This means that it cannot be easily remedied by 'silver bullets' in the form of technology, subsidies, or single-country policy changes, because of the synergetic character of the things that power it.''

The world is running out of farmland. Advanced farming depends entirely on fossil fuels likely to become scarce, supplies of nutrients for farming have peaked and fresh water resources are finite. With global warming, up to half the planet faces regular drought by the end of the century. Storms and the kinds of floods that have devastated Pakistan are tipped to become more frequent and intense.

Cribb has several solutions; none will come easy. It could start with more free trade and diverting just a tenth of the $US1.5 trillion ($A1.7 trillion) global armaments spending to sustaining global food supplies.

It will be costly, but not as costly as failing to create food and water security. The choice is clear. In the 21st century, we either eat - or we fight.

But as Cribb points out, human beings are remarkable. In the 20th century, they developed weapons that could destroy the world but developed systems and agreements not to do it. They damaged the climate but there are strategies, which may or may not be successful, to tackle global warming. The looming food crisis calls for us to better manage water, land, nutrients and other inputs. Green cities that grow food will need to be established and the real costs of food to the environment and society might be passed on consumers.

If Cribb's warnings are correct, the prospect of famine, the third horseman of the Apocalypse, will be the biggest trial of our common humanity. BHP and AWB are footnotes to a much bigger story of how it will reshape business and society.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Australia should do what the US has done with its oil reserves, we should lock up our phosphate deposits to only be used in Australia and not exported. If we want to continue to grow food that is. One day we will wake up and find the imports of foreign fertiliser have stopped and we will have none left in Australia because we sold it overseas cheap.
Posted by Fred, 4/09/2010 7:06:19 AM
Australia is said to be hard hit by climate change. We have only 6% of arable soils in Australia. Most of our soils are poor in quality. We should be ensuring our own food security! We export food now, but with our own population blowing out, we will have to use it for our own domestic requirements more, especially as market gardens are being bulldozed by urban sprawl. Cribb fails to mention the world's exponential population growth. Surely we shouldn't be ignoring this problem, pretending it will go away?
Posted by VivKay, 4/09/2010 8:56:05 AM
Unfortunately everyone but the farmer profits.
Posted by Screwed, 4/09/2010 3:39:22 PM
Australia imports far more than we export. Particularly in Victoria, we import about twice as much as we export. Our economic growth is being driven by population growth, based on imports - of goods and people. There is little chance of Australia not simply becoming "international land" for other countries to ensure their food security, while our leaders remain in denial, and in their out-moded "populate or perish" 1950s mentality.
Posted by Matilda B, 6/09/2010 12:00:37 PM
Farmers have been producing more for less over a century that saw population grow from one billion people to six billion. I can't see any problem producing enough food for nine billion if farmers are paid enough money. In 2007/8 the world's wheat farmers responded to higher prices by producing record tonnages of wheat. Equally, corn production has been catapulted by GM varieties in the 21st century. There will always be doom and gloom about more mouths to feed but the reality of new technology and appropriate rewards for food producers will continue to ensure demand is met and food security is not a chronic issue.
Posted by Prof Logic, 6/09/2010 6:35:50 PM
Land and natural resources are finite, and diminishing due to population growth and simple laws of depletion. There are many overpopulated countries in the world, vying for Australian resources and land. We shouldn't be stupid or ignorant. We should be careful about selling off our resources. The extinction of species is the "canary in the mine" that all is not well on our planet. There is no room for complacency. Theories and ideologies are infinite, but not planet Earth - as people seem to think!
Posted by nimby, 7/09/2010 7:32:37 AM
As usual the corporate bullies will profiteer and farmers will squabble over the scraps.
Posted by The burning ring of fire, 7/09/2010 5:13:44 PM
To VivKay: read the book, VivKay. I don't forget population growth. There is a whole chapter on it. And it isn't 'exponential', in fact the rate of pop growth is slowly decreasing. However demand for food is growing much faster due to economic growth around the world. In the book I suggest ways we can both limit population voluntarily, curb demand and reduce waste of food. Prof Logic is on the money with his/her comment about the poor incomes farmers suffer. We need to fix this. If you want to know how, see http://www.sciencealert.com.au/opinions-global-food-crisis/20103008-21272.html
Posted by Julian Cribb, 8/09/2010 8:40:28 AM
Dear Mr Cribb, thank you, I will try to get hold of your book. However, I must argue that even though the world's population growth rate may be slowly decreasing, as you say, it doesn't mean that it isn't exponential! Just look at the graphs. A growth rate can be steady or exponential at different degrees. Demand for food will exist no matter whether there is economic growth or not, but economic growth - with nation's demanding food higher up the food chain - will exacerbate the whole problem. The taboo on population growth must be addressed.
Posted by VivKay, 8/09/2010 4:12:52 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
01 September, 2010
02 September, 2010
POLL
Q: Are the current record lamb prices sustainable for the industry in the long term?

Yes
(37.2%)

No
(49.9%)

Unsure
(13%)

Total Votes: 401
Poll Date: 29 August, 2010
BLOGS
02 September, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...