News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Time for Doha to deliver for Aus farmers 

Time for Doha to deliver for Aus farmers

21 Jul, 2008 12:29 PM
The Doha Round of World Trade Organisation talks have reached another critical juncture in the bid to deliver a more even playing field for Australian farmers.

The Nationals and the National Farmers' Federation are urging the Labor Government to do more to pressure the global powers to give ground on agriculture at today's crucial WTO Ministerial meeting in Geneva, Switzerland.

NFF president David Crombie has led a delegation of Australian farm leaders to Geneva to personally lobby politicians from the sidelines of the main event.

Mr Crombie says Trade Minister Simon Crean must use the global food crisis to leverage action from the rich nations at the negotiating table.

"The Doha Round of trade liberatisation has repeatedly stalled due to a lack of will of key players, namely the European Union, the United States and several developing countries," Mr Crombie said.

"Breaking down the artificial barriers of tariffs, subsidies and quotas would allow farmers the world over to meet global food needs … at present, farmers who can produce more food are actively prevented from doing so due to out-dated protectionist dogma.

"It is vital that these real pressures are put to trade ministers in Geneva this week. This will likely be the last chance for any agreement on Doha for several years."

Mr Crombie said the over-riding issue for Australian farmers was agricultural market access.

"We argue that these Doha talks must do more than eliminate export subsidies and reduce domestic support – it will be unacceptable if it doesn't also create significant and commercially worthwhile new and improved market access opportunities," he said.

Mr Truss said Mr Crean was also bound to live up to Labor's "gung-ho pre-election promises" and not "roll over for a Z-grade agreement".

"Labor sold out in the Uruguay Round and seems ready to do it again over Doha," Mr Truss said.

Mr Truss also highlighted the need for the major countries to cut farm subsidies and improve market access for Australian products, but also said there should be no special exclusions for sensitive products or trade-offs of agriculture for manufacturing benefits.

"Anything less will be a major disappointment and condemn Australia's exporters to further years of unfair competition in a heavily distorted global market," he said.

Mr Crean last night chaired a meeting of the Cairns Group of countries, a bloc of 19 nations committed to free trade.

"We all want a successful conclusion to these negotiations," Mr Crean said.

"The Group is convinced that an agreement is within our grasp.

"It must be a high quality agreement – the Group was united in its message that there can be no outcome to the Round without a substantial package of reforms on agriculture."

* For more information from the WTO meetings, visit the WTO website.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
We wheat growers have been sold out by Labor and the Liberals by having our single desk abolished. Our negotiators will be sent home with nothing but the sound of laughter from the rest of the world. How can a country that has produced some of the world's best soldiers and sportsman get down to this level in protecting its own interests?
Posted by Jock, 22/07/2008 4:31:44 AM
This world leadership aim is all too easy for policy advocates and all too hard for farmers and processors in the front line of export trade. For us the free trade battle is like landing at Anzac Cove without covering fire while the generals smoke cigars in their wardroom armchairs. The price has been high and has taken us nowhere. And now when a world food shortage looms, previously reluctant nations immediately grasp the opportunity to abandon any free trade notions they may have had. The time has come for an orderly withdrawal to fight on a different front. What we need is not free trade – we need equivalency of trade. They penalise us, we penalise them; they give us free entry, we do likewise.

Trade barriers, tariffs and subsidised production that unfairly penalise Australian producers and processors still abound. Take jam as a simple example. Jam is made here from unsubsidised fruits and sugar. Our jams are exported to Europe including France and the UK and on entry are hit with a 20% tariff on the invoiced price. Meanwhile French and English jam makers have the benefit of subsidised sugar and fruit production which makes it difficult to compete in Europe. But worse still, their jams come in here free of tariff and compete unfairly against ours on the deli and supermarket shelves. 10 years of "free" trade talks have not changed the rules and we continue to posture as leaders and to pay the price.

Posted by Jock Douglas, 22/07/2008 5:22:31 AM
The comment from above, as listed below: “Trade barriers, tariffs and subsidised production that unfairly penalise Australian producers”, is so true.

The problem with it is it relates to agriculture producer’s income, and not their expenses. If Australian farmer’s re-directed their energy to achieving that outcome on their domestic market expenses, instead of grand standing on the international scene, results will be forth coming.

Removing unfair trading with in the domestic economy is far more achievable than trying to dictate to countries involved in the internal market. If agriculture producers were able to have production cost much closer to the world market, the very same market they sell on, industry terms of trade would be much better, and we would not be having this debate.

I have imported a product that has a retail price of $100 in Australia, for a cost of $4 landed. Problem was that’s when the cost started and was costing more to invoice the item out then what it cost, just for a start. Remove the reason for those artificial costs, that actually are subsidies to the urban domestic economy, and agriculture will not be concerned about DOHA.

Posted by city bludger, 22/07/2008 6:36:38 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
WTO Director General Pascal Lamy.
WTO Director General Pascal Lamy.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Will the abolition of AWB's dual share system result in growers' interests being put second to those of the shareholders?

Yes
(70.4%)

No
(25.1%)

Undecided
(4.6%)

Total Votes: 351
Poll Date: 20 July, 2008

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...