News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Want to trade carbon without CPRS? 

Want to trade carbon without CPRS?

18 Jun, 2010 06:00 AM
THE CPRS might be dead — or at least in deep freeze —but carbon trading opportunities for farmers are likely to emerge as Australia opens up a voluntary emissions trading scheme.

The Federal Government is backing the voluntary market with its National Carbon Offset Standard (NCOS), due to begin on July 1, which will establish government-endorsed benchmarks for trading in emissions credits, but without the strings of heavy government regulation.

For agriculture, the most significant aspect of NCOS is that it allows emissions brokers, research agencies and other interested parties to suggest new approaches to creating tradeable emissions offsets.

Greg Combet, Minister Assisting the Minister for Climate Change, told the Voluntary Carbon Markets Association in a recent address that “given the ingenuity of stakeholders in this arena”, he expected plenty of proposals to be put on the table.

“Australian businesses, particularly farmers, will have the opportunity to develop offset credits from a range of activities that reduce emissions while providing other resource management benefits — such as the management of native vegetation and soils, and rehabilitation of rangelands,” Mr Combet told the association.

Michael Kiely of the Carbon Coalition said he was aware of several proposals for trading soil carbon due to be put before NCOS.

After talking with farmers across the country during a series of workshops, he has some of his own criteria for an effective soil carbon offset credit.

“Farmers won’t consider a contract that’s any longer than five years, and if the money is inconsequential, they won’t play at all,” Mr Kiely said.

He believes the success of the voluntary emissions market, and of a market for farm-derived offsets, is of some importance to the government after the political killing of its mandatory trading scheme.

“Penny Wong described the voluntary market as the mandatory market on trainer wheels,” Mr Kiely said.

“The government needs this voluntary market to work as a gateway back to the CPRS, or another version of it. They are asking for the same level of scientific rigour, but without the same rules.”

Mr Combet gave this impression before the Voluntary Carbon Markets Association, where he commented that “progress on climate change cannot be taken for granted ... reform is difficult”.

“You can help to educate and inform the public about climate change and the sorts of changes we can all make to reduce our emissions.

“You can provide the mechanisms whereby individuals and households take action by buying a carbon neutral product.

“Under the NCOS, for the first time in Australia, consumers will also be able to support firms that offset the carbon footprint of their entire operations using a Government-endorsed approach.”

Mr Combet also noted that NCOS will not be administered by government, but by an “independent third party on a cost recovery basis”.

That third-party organisation will be announced before NCOS is due to begin on July 1.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
"They ( the government ) are asking for the same level of scientific rigour, but without the same rules." Let me get this right. Landholders contract with someone to do something for a consideration and there are no rules! Go back to the start. The UNFCCC or the international convention on climate change is a binding agreement where Australia is a party . This ensures that Australia MUST report on both greenhouse sinks and sources arriving at a net position. The Kyoto Protocol is different. It sets a legally binding target or so we thought. An ETS is a vehicle to achieve the target. All these processes are rule driven! A voluntary market is a meaningless exercise unless it delivers for one of the above. Ergo it must have the same rules. Do not for one minute believe that snake oil peddlers are altruists. They are in it for a piece of the action and will say and do anything to put this train wreck back together.
Posted by phil-oc, 21/06/2010 4:20:50 AM
The whole global warming industry is a complete con and hoax.
Posted by Len, 21/06/2010 10:34:23 AM
So Len, you believe that in the mid '80s a group of shonky scientists, working for the almost non-existant renewable energy sector, developed a theory, got thousands of other scientists to fraudulantly peer review it, took it to governments & the UN where it was further ratified. Then amazingly, the multibillion dollar fossil fuel industry, feeling threatened, got a few good scientists to develop alternative theories which although 'correct' failed to get through any peer review process. INCREDIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !
Posted by My Kids Matter, 21/06/2010 5:42:05 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Michael and Louisa Kiely, convenors of the Carbon Coalition
Michael and Louisa Kiely, convenors of the Carbon Coalition
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
16 June, 2010
POLL
Q: Who is your preferred Prime Minister?

Kevin Rudd
(8.4%)

Tony Abbott
(55.5%)

Julia Gillard
(7.3%)

Malcolm Turnbull
(17.3%)

Other
(11.5%)

Total Votes: 1329
Poll Date: 13 June, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...