News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Why aren't super funds investing in ag? 

Why aren't super funds investing in ag?

26 Nov, 2009 09:42 AM
Australia has a trillion dollars worth of superannuation funds under management but less than 0.01 per cent is invested in Australian agriculture, according to Australian Agribusiness Group.

It says international pension funds have recognised the local value proposition and invested more than $1.5 billion (about three times the local total) into Australian agriculture.

And it says that if Australian superannuation funds had invested in Australian agri, their members would have been buffered from the super slaughter of the global financial crisis.

AAG executive chairman, Marcus Elgin, said the GFC wiped out 27pc of Australian's superannuation contributions.

"If some of the money managed by superannuation funds was invested in the top 25pc of agriculture, then those funds would not have suffered as much a loss of value," Mr Elgin said.

"It is proof of the simplest idea of reducing risk through diversification."

Most Australian superannuation funds have yet to acknowledge that the top 25pc of Australian agriculture is a viable investment option, despite it providing 11.2pc returns over the last 12 years but with only one third of the volatility of the All Ordinaries, according to the AAG.

"Superannuation funds should acknowledge agriculture acts as a 'shock absorber' during difficult times because of its negative correlation to major asset classes such as Australian and international shares, low volatility and it's slower investment cycle," Mr Elgin said.

"Agriculture is a stable, low volatility, tangible asset.

"Australia is a globally competitive agricultural player, in a context where the fundamentals of the need for an increasing food supply are unquestionable. Remember - if you don't eat, you die."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Does Timbercorp and Great Southern ring any bells? Agriculture doesn't bring high or stable returns and there are too many dodgy schemes in the rural sector. There is a saying: never invest in things on 4 legs or that grow on trees or grow from the ground. Take a look at the grain sector - why do grain growers keep buying more land? Why can't they make healthy returns out of what they've got? There's something wrong if you have to keep buying your neighbours. Could this be linked to profits? Maybe this is why funds don't invest in agriculture.
Posted by shaun, 26/11/2009 1:40:31 PM, on Farm Weekly
We just finished a two part commentary on Australian Super here http://www.zippy.com.au/super-ain t-so-super-part-1/2009/11/ I don't think AG play the city game they need to tap into this money.
Posted by Zippy, 27/11/2009 3:44:33 AM, on The Land
I have a self-managed superannuation fund. I have looked at investing some of my super with ag-related managed funds (NOT in trees). By and large the returns are not there. When I look at the returns that can be achieved on ag enterprises, the financial risk and the uncertainty of government policy it's just not a prudent option.
Posted by AJ, 27/11/2009 7:39:49 AM, on The Land
Reason !!!.....super funds don't invest in Australian agriculture because of the substantial changes in the Australian climate over the last 15 years and the inherent risk in growing conditions. Too much risk.
Posted by mick, 27/11/2009 8:17:20 AM, on The Land
"Agriculture is a stable, low volatility, tangible asset." What a load of rubbish. The only time there is stability in agriculture is in long-term drought when a farmer knows they will lose money every year. There are few industries more volatile.
Posted by JayDin, 27/11/2009 8:31:16 AM, on The Land
Our self managed fund owns one of our 3 blocks. Ten years ago I wrote to the NSW Minister for Land & Water pointing out that the most favourable economic option for this hilly block was timber production. And that by far the most profitable forest establishment option was not plantation but assisted regeneration to expand the original wet forest mosaic. The objects of our property management plan also stated that, provided there was no serious risk to the capital base, then the option that produced the highest ecological values will prevail. But the risks that we might be prevented from harvesting in future was so high as to be almost a certainty. So we asked if there was any legal mechanism that would deliver the kind of investment certainty that my fiduciary duty as a trustee demanded, especially in respect of the weed infested riparian zones that were most in need of restoration. The Director General wrote back to advise that there were no such mechanisms. There was no way that we could comply with our fiduciary duty as trustees to invest prudently AND allow a single native tree to regenerate on this property. The risk/return relationship was totally outside APRA guidelines.
Posted by Ian Mott, 27/11/2009 9:24:07 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Long term investments + legal requirement to show due diligence + media says environment going to hell = very little investment.
Posted by Edward Metcalfe, 27/11/2009 10:15:10 AM, on Farm Weekly
The only ag investmnent worth chasing here in Australia is the purchase of fertile farmland in high rainfall areas. Land banking for future 2 hectare life style real estate. Big multinational companies are moving out of food production here in Australia. No water and a nice, ETS tax has made future farming un viable. The goverments running this country are not interested in food security are not intrested in a sustainable agricultral industry. More money can be made doing back door deals with free trade agreements, digging dirt and housing a bigger population. Like our pork industry, citrus, fruit, nut, rice, cotton, vegetables - all have been destroyed and sold to the multinational food importers. All food will be imported into this country. The cost of food now costs you more as you have less local producers in the market. Farmers have be sent to the wall due to imported food dumping. Eventually the complete livestock industry will suffer demise. The land will be bulldozed for nice green housing. You will be forced to pay a fortune eating imported rubbish that you wouldn't even feed a dog. Investing in Australian agriculture under current goverment policies would not be a good idea.
Posted by Beef Serf, 27/11/2009 2:52:56 PM, on The Land
It is also worth noting that one of the more brilliant prudential rules set down for DIY Funds thanks to Rudd/Swan is that profits from a funds investment in a property can no longer be reinvested in that property. Yep, all the profits have to be taken out each year and handed to the same clowns who squandered 27% of their client's investments last year. Can anyone think of a more stupid rule to apply to Australian farming operations?
Posted by Ian Mott, 27/11/2009 3:15:16 PM, on Queensland Country Life
Super funds are not investing in agriculture because: 1. The operational returns are inferior to other investments, and 2. The prospect for capital gain is negative in the light of the proposed ETS. However as reported recently on this website super funds are gearing up to invest in agriculture after the ETS causes land values to collapse. This will give them the prospect of a capital gains bonanza.
Posted by Ted O'Brien., 28/11/2009 12:52:19 AM, on The Land
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
25 November, 2009
POLL
Q: How has the deregulation of export wheat marketing affected your farm's profits this harvest?

Increased profits
(22.1%)

Decreased profits
(56.2%)

No change
(21.7%)

Total Votes: 258
Poll Date: 23 November, 2009

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural MON0152
 
Small Farms Expo
 
Freedom Tanks
 
Irwin HunterIrwin Hunter
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
FBG
 
Win a Leica Mojo Mini
 
WA Merino Magazine


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...