News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Why water trading is good for the bush 

Why water trading is good for the bush

10 Jun, 2010 01:20 PM
THE National Water Commission's has today released its report on the impacts of water trading in the southern Murray-Darling Basin, saying that it provides significant economic, social and environmental benefits.

Speaking at the Australian Irrigation Conference in Sydney, National Water Commissioner, Laurie Arthur said the report showed water trading was a "major success story" and that without it, the effects of drought would have had far greater consequences on the region.

"Participation in water markets has given irrigators much needed flexibility in how they run their farm businesses during tough times - helping them to improve cash flow, retire debt and manage risk," he said.

The report estimated water trading in the southern Murray-Darling Basin added $220 million to Australia's GDP in 2008-09; with net production benefits of $79m in NSW, $16m in South Australia, and $271m in Victoria.

Water trading has also contributed to securing critical urban water needs in Adelaide, Bendigo and Ballarat.

Mr Arthur said the report supported the National Water Commission's call for an end to restrictions on entitlement trading.

"Water trading will play an increasingly important role in allowing irrigators in the MDB to manage the impacts of future climate variability and the new sustainable diversion limits that will be introduced under the new Basin Plan," he said.

Overall, the report contains 37 findings for consideration by the Commonwealth and southern Basin states via the Murray-Darling Basin Ministerial Council.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Is water a commodity to be traded for bankers to make money or for farmers to manage as a resource for the long term sustainability of their wealth creating assets? The government's heavy handed impost just made it more difficult for real people doing real things on the land.
Posted by dried up, 11/06/2010 6:43:04 AM
The major issues in this whole water debacle,is that we do not lose sight of the fact that environmental issues, do not overshadow a sustainable agriculture / rural, horticulture and viticulture industries.There must be a balance as Australia will face a food shortage and Australians will be the losers.
Posted by Angasb, 11/06/2010 8:23:37 AM
@ dried up: Is it possible that it is neither of those things? Or that it is both of them? Your statement is narrow minded and farmer focused. Water is a resource for the long term sustainability of almost every activity we perform - our lives and livelihoods, some of our recreation and our responsibility to maintain the environment. Finding a balance for the competing demands on water is essential. Whether creating a market to allow the invisible hand sort it out is the right I approach I can't say, but implying that water is a resource only for farmers certainly isn't the path we want to be taking. Frankly, one the benefits of treating water as a commodity is that it imposes responsibility on the few that would abuse it if it were free.
Posted by The Dude, 11/06/2010 9:18:47 AM
Water is a commodity, just like land, seed and fertiliser. The best way to manage it is via a proper functioning market.
Posted by dickytiger, 11/06/2010 11:15:47 AM
Oh yeah - water trading doesn't actually creat anything even if several million was traded - effectively its all on paper. It is how it is used that is important and that is where the real benefits are
Posted by antonbiz, 14/06/2010 9:12:06 PM
Why isn't there any talk of re-diverting flows and developing a national water program that will ensure water for agriculture. Water trading is looking from the perspective of trying to control what is rather than developing what could be and is just another cop out from taking control and making the hard decisions.
Posted by ONR, 20/06/2010 12:20:05 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
10 June, 2010
09 June, 2010
POLL
Q: Which is your preferred model for a new national grains industry lobby group?

Grain Producers Australia
(49.3%)

National Grains Australia
(31.1%)

Other
(19.6%)

Total Votes: 225
Poll Date: 06 June, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...