News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Ag and food sectors 'bigger than mining' 

Ag and food sectors 'bigger than mining'

28 Oct, 2009 02:00 PM
AUSTRALIA'S food and grocery industry turns over more each year than our automotive or housing sectors, and combined with pre-farm gate agriculture would outstrip mining too, according to a new report launched in Canberra tonight.

The Australian Food and Grocery Council's 'State of the Industry 2009' report, launched by Minister for Agriculture, Tony Burke, revealed the food sector's turnover was worth $100 billion and responsible for more than 38,000 businesses in Australia.

It said in the five years to June 2007, the sector's turnover had increased by 5.9 per cent, with the fresh produce sector incredibly recording growth of 32pc.

It says dairy and meat manufacturing are the food and beverage sector's two largest industries.

The combined value-add for food, grocery and fresh produce is around $27 billion, and the combined sectors account for 9.1pc of Australia's total international trade, or valued at $49 billion in the past 12 months.

The report was prepared by KPMG and is the first time the industry has released such a comprehensive snapshot.

Apart from trade figures, however, most of the data refers to the years 2006-2007.

The food and grocery sector are meeting in Canberra for two days of information sessions on the future of food and grocery production and manufacturing in Australia.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
All this money and producers are treated like dirt.
Posted by shaun, 28/10/2009 10:18:07 PM
These figures don't give a true picture of the value of the food sector. The sector is job rich (particularly when compared to mining) and socially more inclusive - it's profits are more evenly distributed.

Why is the mining sector allowed to drive the national infrastructure and climate change response agendas while the food sector is largely ignored?

Posted by peterbhai, 29/10/2009 4:31:17 AM
Mining's influence stems from collective action pursuing political agendas and influence over politicians. Democracy is perverted through funding political parties and political campaigns – those who pay the piper call the tune. Advertisements being run by the mineral council regarding CPRS demonstrate willingness to act collectively.

To influence events, a series of questions need to be asked: what are the commodities of power that will influence results in the sectors, how are they obtained, how can they be used and how should they be passed on?

Experience of primary industries has shown me players neither work collectively nor walk away from deals that benefit them personally at the expense of group commitment.

Experience of government is decisions are made by those who turn up. Knight’s article above is flattering to agricultural producers, but in the long run, who cares? Media is noise and the old saying “this morning’s newspaper is this afternoon’s fish and chip wrapping” is true. Is it possible for producers to work collectively to obtain and use power to improve their lot? Another old saying is “the squeaky wheel gets oiled” expresses a great deal of truth.

Posted by Observant, 29/10/2009 9:10:50 AM
Exactly, shaun and peterbhai. None of what we do in terms of managing the environment, revegetating, and preserving our ecology is considered, and this means we grow better quality produce all the time. These activities are a spin off.

In mining, we have to pay for the reparation of the land and all the unintended consequences. Perspective and recognition of our contribution is vital.

Posted by twodragons, 29/10/2009 10:32:42 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
27 October, 2009
28 October, 2009
POLL
Q: For what level of cattle transaction levy will you be voting at this year's Meat and Livestock Australia annual general meeting?

$3.50
(64.9%)

$5
(35.1%)

Total Votes: 276
Poll Date: 25 October, 2009

Most popular articles


Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...