News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Australia not ready for Round-up Ready lucerne 

Australia not ready for Round-up Ready lucerne

11 Mar, 2009 12:28 PM
The ideal plant to help farmers battle climate change is not likely to be brought into Australia for years.

Glyphosate-tolerant or Roundup-Ready (RR) lucerne, developed by Forage Genetics and Monsanto, was first available in the United States in 2005 and is set to be re-released there again later this year.

But the cost of research and deregulation to bring it to Australia is simply too great.

RR lucerne is genetically modified and according to the manager of the international division of Forage Genetics, Bill Knipe, the market for the product in Australia may not yet be large enough for his company together with Monsanto and marketing partners to apply to have it deregulated in Australia.

Monsanto and Forage Genetics own the patents for RR lucerne and it would be a decision made by those two companies if the plant was to come into this country.

PGG Wrightsons agronomist, Reg Hill, said RR lucerne would have a great market in Australia depending on the price because of its production convenience versus conventional lucerne, which requires various chemical treatments to keep weeds at bay.

"Life would be much easier for growers if it was available but it is in part a commercial decision but also a regulatory decision by others not to bring it in," Mr Hill said.

"It just is not feasible at the moment given the costs involved with research and deregulation."

RR lucerne is presently undergoing an environmental assessment through the US Department of Agriculture after court action in California challenged its application process in 2005 (the challenge was not based on technical grounds).

Lucerne promises to not only help bridge the summer-autumn feed gap but also provide high protein feed to finish lambs, provide a fire break and increase soil nitrogen in a crop rotation.

Naturally there is a cost for this super-legume.

Lucerne must be managed carefully, its establishment must be right and ongoing winter cleaning is also paramount.

Mr Knipe said the potential for further genetic engineering of lucerne was enormous.

His company is currently working to improve the digestibility and drought tolerance of the species, with a proposed release date of 2015 in the US of a new variety.

He added the costs surrounding the regulation for the importation of RR lucerne meant it was unlikely to be seen in Australia soon, but said the public fear about genetic modification had, in his opinion, "reduced significantly" in Australia with the lifting of the moratorium on genetically modified crops in New South Wales and Victoria.

Mr Hill said his company did not have any plans to import Roundup-Ready lucerne.

To import and sell RR lucerne a genetically modified organism (GMO) license would need to be issued by the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator after a strict assessment process involving field trials and a risk assessment and risk management plan.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Thank God! Hopefully Australian farmers continue fighting this. Australian do not want GM foods.

Do your research before accepting anything form Monsanto or GM.

Posted by Truthseeker, 11/03/2009 9:54:43 PM
There is no doubt that plant breeding has advanced agriculture. However, there is no single plant that will help farmers overcome the limitations of drought.

The only strategy that farmers can adopt to overcome climate limitations is improve soil health. The improvement in soil biology and carbon will improve soil moisture retention, overcome compaction, improve nutrient availability (particularly phosphorous), increase disease resistance and food production.

For example, the trace mineral to prevent rust in wheat is known and now used by some farmers with great success. Yet millions of public dollars are are spent on genetic modification for wheat rust resistance.

The genetic camp has more hype than hope.

Posted by Mangiri, 12/03/2009 4:29:00 AM
Why would we want this GM Lucerne when its release has been blocked by court order in the USA? Why would anyone want to subject their soils to an onslaught of unnecessary toxic chemical?

Farmers in USA are turning away from GMOs for many reasons. Why contaminate seed supplies and have to pay to do so?

I don't understand how naive some farmers can be as many are sucked in by the GM Trojan horse.

Posted by ggwagga, 12/03/2009 4:42:00 AM
When consumers are OK with any GM crops - then and only then will I consider them? I produce food. The health and confidence of my customers are the focus.
Posted by g, 12/03/2009 9:11:32 AM
“The ideal plant to help farmers battle climate change is not likely to be brought into Australia for years”, the article says. What does Roundup have to do with climate change?
Posted by ggkylebay, 12/03/2009 12:18:45 PM
"But the cost of research and deregulation to bring it to Australia is simply too great," the article says. Awww Monsanto, cry me a river, build me a bridge and get over it.

Excellent point ggkylebay. What does Round Up readyness have to do with climate change?

Posted by bagheera, 12/03/2009 6:53:33 PM
'Ggkylebay' asks what has Roundup to do with climate change? .

Well. if you mention climate change in seeking grant funding, you will normally get the funding. Roundup has nothing to do with the climate.

Posted by Len, 12/03/2009 7:03:24 PM
This article is setting up Australian farmers to think, gee, why are we always the last in line to get the really new, good stuff? It's a teaser article, almost certainly put out by Monsanto's marketing company.
Posted by Seraph, 13/03/2009 4:18:03 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
PGG Wrightson agronomist Reg Hill and manager of the international division of Forage Genetics, Bill Knipe.
PGG Wrightson agronomist Reg Hill and manager of the international division of Forage Genetics, Bill Knipe.
Related Coverage
MULTIMEDIA
10 March, 2009
11 March, 2009
05 March, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you support SA Premier Mike Rann's High Court challenge to force the removal of water trading caps in the Murray Darling Basin?

Yes
(41.6%)

No
(47.1%)

Undecided
(11.2%)

Total Votes: 490
Poll Date: 08 March, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...