News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Emissions to rise 20pc without ETS 

Emissions to rise 20pc without ETS

09 Aug, 2009 11:03 AM
THE Federal Government has moved to further pressure the Coalition to support its emissions trading legislation, releasing a report estimating Australia's output of greenhouse gases would be 20 per cent above 2000 levels by 2020 in the scheme's absence.

The report, by the Department of Climate Change, found emissions growth had slowed over the past year because of the financial crisis, but that Australia's output of greenhouse gases was still rising, with an average annual increase of 1.6 per cent between September 1998 and March 2009. In 2008 Australia produced the equivalent of 584 million tonnes of carbon dioxide, compared with 553 million tonnes in 2000.

In the absence of any action, the department believes emissions will have risen to 664 million tonnes by 2020 - 14 per cent more than the current level and 20 per cent more than in 2000. To achieve a cut of 5 per cent below 2000 levels, Australia would need to produce about 59 million tonnes less than today. To achieve a 25 per cent cut, emissions would need to be about 170 million tonnes lower.

But because Australia's economy and population will have grown considerably by 2020, the job will be much tougher. The paper said that to meet the lower target, the nation would need to avoid producing 138 million tonnes by 2020. It would need to avoid producing 249 million tonnes to meet the larger target.

Climate Change Minister Penny Wong said the rise in emissions that would occur without the scheme would be equal to doubling the number of cars on the roads over the next decade.

Legislation for the scheme is due to be voted on in the Senate on Thursday, when it is likely to be defeated. The Coalition is divided over whether such a scheme should be adopted.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
So what! Carbon has little effect on the climate and if Rudd had any brains at all he would be introducing a nuclear power program to reduce our dependence on carbon fuel. Let's hope the bill fails in the Senate.
Posted by Bobby of Tara, 9/08/2009 5:04:07 PM
And what exactly will happen if Australia fails to meet the lower target? We have countries around the world totally ignoring any calls to reduce carbon emmissions. But good ol Australia, just like it did with the removal of protection tariffs, gallops forward and wants to lead the way.

Why? Why make ceratin sectors, like agriculture, pay? To help contribute towards a theory?

Posted by Gecko, 10/08/2009 3:13:59 AM
If Australians carbon emissions rose by 200pc, that would result in lifting overall world carbon emissions by 2pc. Let's just try and keep perception at least within shouting distance of reality.
Posted by Qlander, 10/08/2009 6:19:26 AM
For all those ostriches who still think that CO2 has nothing to do with climate change, check out the independent, science based, brilliant movies here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boj9ccV9htk&feature=related (Each movie will only take 8 minutes or so out of your life).
Posted by Skeptic, 10/08/2009 7:32:23 AM
Our carbon emissions will continue to rise even with ETS. This will do little to stop emissions. It will look as if our government is doing something but really nothing! The big polluters are protected.

With our record population growth figures, there will be more consumers and thus more emissions.

Posted by Bob, 10/08/2009 7:58:02 AM
The major so-called green house gas is water vapour by a long way. CO2 is miniscule. Climate has been changing since the world began. If you check the history books they will tell you that we have had droughts and good seasons from the start of farming in Australia.

Nothing to do with carbon.

Posted by Len, 10/08/2009 9:54:42 AM
Today Malcolm Turnbull came up with a cheaper ETS. It was instantly dismissed by Labor. Obviously money into government coffers is the bottom line.
Posted by jerangle, 10/08/2009 11:55:16 AM
Either way you look at it, there will be emissions being emitted whilst there is a demand for the products we all use.

The scheme is just a scheme to sting the public and the emissions will go down when the energy is changed to green energy.

Until then, the politicians will continue to draft a scheme to take the public for all their worth.

Posted by Atheistno1, 10/08/2009 3:48:33 PM
Atheistno, what is this green energy you speak of? I don't like our chances of getting green energy that works, you only have to look at how well wind is going, and solar isn't much better.

We will never reduce emmisions with green energy until we get something that actually works.

Posted by mick, 11/08/2009 5:35:02 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
07 August, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you believe the RSPCA's claim that live exports can be ended without significantly hurting the economy?

Yes
(16.4%)

No
(80.2%)

Undecided
(3.3%)

Total Votes: 602
Poll Date: 09 August, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...