News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 ETS costs to agriculture fail to deter Rudd 

ETS costs to agriculture fail to deter Rudd

03 Jun, 2009 02:43 PM
A NEW Government report revealing further impacts to agriculture from an emissions trading scheme hasn't deterred Prime Minister Kevin Rudd from pushing through legislation in a determined attempt to have Labor's proposed carbon pollution reduction scheme locked in place before the end of this month.

The House of Representatives is set to for a second all-nighter to debate legislation on emissions trading, which is expected to pass the lower house before moving to a much more hostile reception in the Senate.

New data from ABARE on the impacts of the Government's scheme barely rated a mention with the Government, however on the same day new money was announced to help farmers in the grain, grape, dairy, aquaculture and beef industries adapt to climate change.

The Government all-but rejected the report because it assumed farmers would not be making any improvements by adapting to climate change.

While tabling the new ABARE report in Parliament, Agriculture Minister Tony Burke didn't acknowledge its findings which include a hit to nearly all commodity sectors and greater costs from food and fibre processing being passed back to the farmer when the scheme starts in 2011.

The report forecasts an almost two per cent reduction in the economic value of farm production across all broadacre sectors from the start of the scheme, even though agriculture is not to be included until at least 2015.

Dairy farms, according to the report, will be hardest hit.

"Even if the agriculture sector is not a covered sector under the CPRS, agricultural producers will face increased input costs associated with the use of electricity, fuels and freight and may face lower farm-gate prices for their goods from downstream processors," the report said.

"These will have implications for the economic value of farm production."

The news comes on top of the latest greenhouse statistics which reveal that while agriculture is one of the nation's largest emitter's of greenhouse gas, it has also made the biggest reductions over the past 17 years than any other sector.

However, Mr Burke this week met with leaders from several farmer and commodity organisations and told parliament that together the Government and farm groups were working through issues relating to whether or not agriculture would be included in the scheme in 2015.

It's believed a technical working group is being formed to meet with Government officials on a fortnightly basis to go through the complexities surrounding agriculture's inclusion in the scheme.

Opposition spokesman for agriculture, John Cobb, said the ABARE report "confirms food producers will go broke" because of the ETS.

Mr Cobb said the Rudd Government's ETS would be "an expensive folly which will lead to higher food prices, less farmers and more imported food, with no net benefit for the environment".

Speaking to the legislation, introduced on Tuesday night, Opposition spokesman for the environment, Greg hunt, said the Coalition could not support the Government's legislation because it sends global emissions up by exporting Australian emissions to higher-polluting nations.

With Coalition opposition threatening to quash the Bill when it reaches the Senate, Minister for Climate Change, Penny Wong, is now working frantically with the Greens and Independents to get the legislation up.

"With the Greens, with Senator Xenophon, with Senator Fielding, we’ll be asking them to look to the national interest," Senator Wong said.

"We will be going through with them why we think this is a sound scheme, a good scheme, a scheme which will drive the change that I know most Australians want.

"We will be doing that and we will be asking them to look to the national interest…unfortunately Mr Turnbull has walked out of the room because of the division in his own party room."

Opposition spokesman on the ETS, Andrew Robb, said in parliament today that the Government had ignored current commercial realities and the scheme was deeply flawed.

"The Government scheme must not be passed," Mr Robb said.

"This is the biggest structural change to our economy and we must get it right."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
There are no votes for Labor in rural seats. Labor hates farmers, especially KRudd who has personally seen that farmers lose any marketing strength with the removal of the national pool for wheat.

Dairy is in a mess due to deregulation,6 as are many other rural industries.

Farm exports have kept Australia out of reccession so what does KRudd do: he slashes rural research funding and then gives away '$460,000,000 to foreign farmers in aid.

KRudd wants our industry to fall into foreign ownership and control. God help Australia as nothing will save us from KRudd and his band, including the worst Ag Minister in history.

Posted by Fred, 4/06/2009 6:08:45 AM
Yesterday's quarterly results had little to do with anything relating to 'cash handouts', in fact it was more to do with a consumer shut-down for imported goods such as electronics and furniture/whitegoods as well as an extremely favourable A$ exchange rate which lifted exports - that largely accounted for the good news yesterday! Very little to do with Rudd, Swan, Tanner & Gillard but the next quarters results will 'seriously' focus on these 'Democratic Socialists' and their ideological fiscal and economic management strategies and proclaimed "we know best"! Personally, I am looking forward to the imminent and predictable demise of these 'cock-a-hoops', unfortunately they are taking us with them so strap-in.
Posted by Clark Goodwin, 4/06/2009 6:55:39 AM
Is it 'Climate Change' or 'Time For A Change'?
Posted by Clark Goodwin, 4/06/2009 6:57:43 AM
A report by Greenpeace says that the Amazon is being destroyed by the growing beef industry and that the destruction of the Amazon is leading to more greenhouse gassess.

If there was ever a reason to suppport beef farmers in Australia who operate in a well regulated safe and environmentlayy frineldy way, then this is it.

Support Aussie farmers and stop deforesting Indonesia and the Amazon.

Posted by the lorax, 4/06/2009 7:22:37 AM
This is our second year farming in our own right. Just developed $5m of irrigated horticulture. Just planted 2500ha wheat.

Just found out that money invested into the farm (topping up shortfalls) from our existing horticultural enterprise will be taxed, even though our existing enterprise can't afford it and the banks have lost the plot.

We lost $250K on last years' wheat. Have not recieved 1 cent from the govt in EC or subsidised machinery.

I'm a 33 y.o. new farmer and am starting to wonder what I was thinking. Why is KRudd so hell bent on ETS? I can say without any doubt that it is his ETS which he is counting on to repay his recent spending spree.

I will rally the troops. This will, in my opinion, be the subject which brings Australia's farming families together as one.

Now is the time to start planning how we as one can turn around the importance of the rural vote and turn it against this man who will go down in history as the most discraced Labor leader of all time.

Yes, it's time for a change...this time for good reason.

Posted by Lil farmer, 4/06/2009 8:33:41 AM
On one hand, Rudd is not backing agriculture. Yet he thanks the balance of trade figures, with a rise in exports from agriculture of 18pc this quarter.

That has been the only sector that kept the country out of resession, for now.

Posted by Dave, 4/06/2009 9:15:17 AM
I have been in China for 2 months. Let these idiot politicians come here and live for a while. Then they might appreciate our farmers.

Then again I don't think they would - I think they have there own agenda. And I don't think it involves our agricultural industry.

Posted by Jeff, 4/06/2009 11:08:20 AM
Enough is enough. We all know the ETS is BS and will destroy the economy. Stop the crap and lets get serious.

Who is out there who can start a proper protest no holds barred ? The way Rudd and his team operate it's about time farmers rallied. Let them know so they bring out the riot police. Now that's a demonstration of anger.

Posted by damien stephenson, 4/06/2009 4:49:31 PM
Fortunately it looks like Rudd's premature climate change ideas are going to be stopped dead by the Senate. He wants to go to Copenhagen as a big time statesman, rather than a pipsqueak prime minister from Australia.

That is the only reason for his panic in wanting this bill passed NOW. If he wasnts a double dissolution over it, well that's his privelidge.

Posted by richo, 4/06/2009 5:16:42 PM
Lucy. You tell us of "the latest greenhouse statistics which reveal that ... agriculture is one of the nation's largest emitters of greenhouse gas". Who wrote these statistics and where did he/she/they get the data which supposedly supports this assertion?

It is quite clear that whatever the science involved these statistics are not science, they represent corrupt politics. It is ironic that they can appropriately be described as a load of bull.

Show us your data and show us how you got it.

Posted by Ted O'Brien, 4/06/2009 6:39:49 PM
Ted, The figures I referred to were in the Australian National Greenhouse Accounts - National Inventory by Economic Sector 2007, released earlier this week. The report was released by the Department of Climate Change, and the figures contained in it are consistent with the same greenhouse account figures complied in inventories done by the previous Coalition government.

Table one in the report breaks down total greenhouse emissions by sector, revealing Primary Industries as the largest overall emitter with 207 metric tonnes of Co2e (carbon equivalent) or 34.7 per cent of total emissions.

For agriculture specifically the figure is 25.1pc of emissions, while mining is 9.5pc.

The primary industries figure is above electricity, gas and water, as well as manufacturing and transport.

The report notes that emissions from agriculture, forestry and fishing have declined by 31.9 per cent (70.3 Mt CO2-e) since greenhouse reporting first began in 1990. The report says the strong decline reflects the impacts of declining emissions from the clearing of forest cover and increased removals by the forestry industry.

These emissions are calculated in accordance with Kyoto Protocol emission accounting rules, which have been widely acknowledged as unfair to farmers because they fail to recognise the life cycle of farming.


Posted by Lucy Knight on 5/06/2009 9:32:06 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
02 June, 2009
01 June, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you support the recommendation to maintain the national beef levy at $5 per head sold?

Yes
(39.2%)

No
(51.6%)

Undecided
(9.2%)

Total Votes: 697
Poll Date: 31 May, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...