News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Flannery says farming's the answer to carbon 

Flannery says farming's the answer to carbon

07 Nov, 2008 10:08 AM
Farming and forestry hold the keys to resolving global warming, because carbon trading by itself “is nowhere near sufficient” to deal with the crisis, prominent scientist Tim Flannery said last week.

Addressing the CarbonExpo 2008 conference on the Gold Coast, Professor Flannery said there needs to be a renewed emphasis on working with the living planet to address global warming, because

By digging up vast quantities of fossil fuel and releasing its carbon into the atmosphere, humans are knocking off-balance the biological systems that create the conditions that make the planet habitable.

“In my view, the global carbon trading scheme is absolutely necessary in order to deal with this crisis,” Prof. Flannery said.

“But it is nowhere near sufficient.

“Carbon trading deals with something that has been foregone or hasn’t happened — a negative emission or non-existent emission.

"What plants do is pull carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and sequester that carbon dioxide in measurable amounts in the biosphere.

"It’s perhaps best termed ‘atmospheric cleansing’.”

He proposed three “wedges” that harness living plants, two of them involving agriculture.

• Raising the soil carbon levels of the world’s extensive grasslands by just 2pc would sequester hundreds of gigatonnes of atmospheric carbon, Prof Flannery observed, and could be done using technologies already well understood.

“There are improved grazing technologies that include holistic management, rotational grazing and so forth, widely practised today,” he said.

“Holistic management, for example, is practised over about 10 million acres globally.

"(The practice) has demonstrably increased carbon content in soils by up to three percent.”

• A second agriculture-specific technology is biochar, the inert material created when organic material is burnt slowly under conditions which limit oxygen.

The process releases a gas that can be converted to biofuel, while the biochar itself embodies carbon that will stay stable in the soil for hundreds, perhaps thousands of years.

“The charcoal has residual nutrients in it,” Prof. Flannery said. “It helps with soil moisture retention, so it makes moisture available for plants for longer. It also helps address acid imbalance in soils.

“One of the most astonishing potentials for that charcoal is its ability to reduce nitrous oxide emissions.

"It does that by altering the microbial balance in the soils, keeping the nitrogen around longer and making it available to plants rather than bacteria that will nitrify it and lead to nitrous oxide emissions.

“Those sorts of technologies are going to be supremely important for humanity.”

• But the most urgent action needs to be the protection, and regeneration, of tropical forests.

Plants and trees literally grow from the air, Prof Flannery observed, drawing on soil water and minerals to help power a process that turns atmospheric carbon dioxide and other elements into wood, bark, flowers and sap.

He suggested that protecting existing tropical forest, and regrowing them where possible, would make an enormous contribution to carbon sequestration efforts.

“Eighteen percent of all anthropogenic carbon today comes from the destruction of those forests," he said.

"Since the large-scale destruction of those forests began around 200 years ago, the destruction of plant matter on earth, living plant matter, has added about 300 gigatonnes of carbon to the atmosphere.

“Not only has it added that carbon, it has weakened the life force that regulates our planetary system.”

On all key measures, Professor Flannery said, the pace of global warming is as bad, or worse, than the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) forecast earlier in the decade.

Carbon dioxide is accumulating in the atmosphere faster than forecast, oceans are rising faster than forecast, and the temperature increase on the planet’s surface is tracking the IPCC’s worst-case scenario.

* Tim Flannery was a founding member of the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists. He is the author of The Future Eaters and The Weather Makers.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The Rest of the Biochar Story: Charles Mann ("1491")in the Sept. National Geographic has a wonderful soils article which places Terra Preta / Biochar soils center stage. I think Biochar has climbed the pinnacle, NGM gets more than fifty million readers monthly! We need to encourage more coverage now, to ride Mann's coattails to public critical mass. Please put this (soil) bug in your colleague's ears. These issues need to gain traction among all the various disciplines who have an iron in this fire. http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/09/soil/mann-text It's what Mann hasn't covered that I thought should interest any writer as a follow up article. The Biochar provisions by Sen.Ken Salazar in the 07 farm bill, Dr, James Hansen's Global warming solutions paper and letter to the G-8 conference last month, and coming article in Science, http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0804/0804.1126.pdf The new university programs & field studies, in temperate soils Glomalin's role in soil tilth & Terra Preta, The International Biochar Initiative Conference Sept 8 in New Castle; http://www.biochar-international.org/ibi2008conference/about ibi2008conference.html Given the current "Crisis" atmosphere concerning energy, soil sustainability, food vs. Biofuels, and Climate Change what other subject addresses them all?
Posted by erich, 7/11/2008 11:33:31 AM
Agriculture won't get anything out of this. The Rudd government is only interested in milking cash from agriculture, not in paying them to fulfill the Labor agenda. That's why they keep saying it's too hard.
Posted by Brindi, 7/11/2008 4:26:00 PM
Up to now agriculture has been sticking its head in the sand and just hoping it will all go away. It is NOT the Government who is saying it is all too hard, it has been agriculture itself. If agriculture starts calling for the chance to play its vital role then the Government will listen.
Posted by soil carbon, 10/11/2008 3:22:18 AM
There are people in agriculture taking action - the 'soil carbon movement' includes the Carbon Coalition which Matt Cawood said "single-handedly barnstormed the issue onto the national agenda". The movement's annual conference is on soon - the Carbon Farming Expo & Conference, 18-19 November, 2008 at Orange NSW. www.carbonfarming.net.au or 02 6374 0329
Posted by Michael Kiely, 10/11/2008 4:20:51 AM
Three words put together by one man; Natural Sequence Farming proposed by Peter Andrews. Makes sense to me.
Posted by mbh, 10/11/2008 4:38:10 AM
All well and good in theory. I have a lot of experience in getting such projects off the ground and it is a lot harder than it looks. Issues around land tenure, contracts, maintainence, monitoring and verification take what shouild eb a low-cost abatement strategy and turn it into an administrative struggle between umpteen government departments most of which think they run the country but have limited understanding of the reality of carbon trading and emissions management on farm.
Posted by Ben Keogh, 10/11/2008 7:02:23 AM
Where's the logic in burning fossil fuels to cut down trees and/or harvest biomass so that you can then plough half of the potential energy back into the field??? Why not just cut the middle man out and stop digging up fossil fuels. There's plenty of sunshine ...... make hay!
Posted by ccpe, 10/11/2008 7:07:26 AM
I agree with Tim Flannery and the other positive commnetators. Some further facts that are not emphasized enough in the media. Agriculture has a smaller number of voters and is widely dispersed. Thus on any issue you get a divided response rather than a united response. Witness the difference between the response to the Global financial crisis - $10B promised within a week or so, but Agriculture is still waiting after a year for the money to flow to correct the water misallocation. The impact of the drought and water misallocation will have a bigger impact on the Asutalian economy than the financial crisis because of the impact on rural communities and horticulture once lost will never be regained because of the cost of re-establishment. Second the end use of timber from Agroforestry is important. If it goes into structural timber it is sequestered for up to 100 years but paper pulp can be back in the atmosphere within 5-10 years and so is not sequestered. Coppicing sugar gums can also reduce the time between harvests of rotations and the loss of root biomass. Tim mentioned soil improvement of water and nutrient retention, but carbon also improves soil structure, it could sequester up to 50% of carbon to become a potting mix and still grow plants! Think of the koo-wee-rup swamps, which were peat until drained and then grew great potatoes! Carbon content of soils can be detected by satellite spectrum analysis in a similar way to salinity and pasture density. Thus to pay farmers for their sequestration would only require site calibration every 5 years with corrections for higher or lower rates of sequestration compared to the satellite readings. Finally farmers could be paid for their stewardship of the land and landscape as is being planned in Europe. Alley farming with trees for structural timber over 10% of every property would not reduce production, in fact increase it due to the effect of sheltering and nutient recycliing. Check out WA experience in Esperance, where alley farming increased production up to 400% due to lowering the salty water tables on the Martindale farm experiment..
Posted by busho, 10/11/2008 8:40:38 AM
Do you people down there still believe this stuff? Global warming and cooling follows a cycle and they occur about every 100,000 years. Large amounts of CO2 in the atmosphere means massive growth ask this great scientist where Australia's coal came from.
Posted by jaimie, 10/11/2008 12:20:36 PM
Flannery starts off with a falsehood, that is, he speaks of Global Warming. The temperatures have actually decreased since 2002. The rest that follows is also false.
Posted by Len, 10/11/2008 3:29:19 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Will farmers be better off if agriculture is included in a carbon emissions trading system?

Yes - selling carbon will make us more profitable
(23%)

No - carbon taxes will increase our costs
(46%)

Undecided - We need more information
(31%)

Total Votes: 574
Poll Date: 09 November, 2008

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...