News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 GAB water savings to be auctioned off 

GAB water savings to be auctioned off

11 Jun, 2009 06:23 AM
GREAT Artesian Basin water saved by farmers from Queensland, NSW, South Australia and the Northern Territory at considerable expense is about to be auctioned off for new users.

The NSW Government is preparing to sell new water licences in the Great Artesian Basin (GAB) from water saved as part of the long-running cap and pipe the bore scheme.

But some farmers who have undertaken the expensive capping and piping exercise to help save water in the basin are furious the Government could still consider selling off the savings, especially at a time when the Federal Government is buying up vast tracts of water entitlements from farmers for the environment.

They question what incentive there will be for farmers to continue to invest voluntarily to save water if the Government then turns around and sells it.

There are now calls for the Rudd Government to step in and override next month's sale.

The NSW Government will make 30 per cent of water saved through the cap and pipe the bore scheme in NSW available for new and existing users to buy for the purposes of tourism, mining, irrigation and other regional developments.

It will be sold off at a series of auctions in coming months.

The remaining 70 per cent of water will be left for the environment, and proceeds from the sale will, according to the Government, be put back into the cap and pipe the bore scheme to help fund further upgrades throughout the NSW portion of the Basin.

The auction was part of a pre-existing national plan for the GAB to return some of the huge forecast savings from capping and piping free-flowing bores to communities so regional development and investment could continue in some form.

NSW Minister for Water Resources, Phil Costa, recently announced the sale of 1,200 megalitres of water saved from the Central, Warrego and Surat groundwater sources of the GAB and a special auction will take place in the NSW North West town of Walgett on July 21.

The Great Artesian Basin is one of the largest underground sources of water in the world, underlying one-fifth of the Australian continent across 1.7 million square kilometres.

A strategic management plan for the GAB was developed in 2000, with a subsequent voluntary program encouraging farmers to turn off free-flowing bores and bore drains and pipe water to central points to stop massive water wastage through seepage and evaporation and help rescue huge drops in artesian bore pressure.

Mr Costa said this was the first auction of water saved from the cap and pipe the bore scheme and more would occur depending on the response to this one.

He said he hasn't heard of any concerns about the sale so far, and believes the water sold will generate new economic activity and jobs in regional communities.

"We need to use this opportunity to drive further stimulus in rural regions, including more cap and piping," Mr Costa said.

"The artesian basin is not at risk.

"Each area in the basin is a discreet basin, that's what I've been told. We don't expect at all that there's going to be a risk in terms of supply."

Former national chairman of the Great Artesian Basin Consultative Committee, John Seccombe, said redistributing water savings made from the cap and pipe the bore scheme was always part of the strategic plan for water reform in the GAB.

Mr Seccombe a farmer from Muttaburra, near Longreach, was for 10 years the driving force behind the cap and bore program when it first started.

He says some of that saved water should be divided up for consumptive use, but questions why the savings would be coming from the three basins mentioned.

He said the Warrego and Surat basin regions in particular were two of the most degraded in the entire GAB in terms of decimated bore pressure and he thinks selling 30 per cent of water saved in those areas was "probably too high".

"There was a lot of waste occurring in the first place – 95 per cent of the water which went through old free-flowing bores was wasted," Mr Seccombe said.

"So the scheme is delivering considerable water savings.

"But in areas highly degraded there is a considerable amount of water which would need to be left."

Mr Seccombe said while he believes new industries, like feedlots and mines, should still be able to apply for a water licence to allow the opportunity for regional economic activity to continue in the bush, he does not like the idea of auctioning off all savings in all areas.

Liberal Senator, Bill Heffernan, has slammed the move and says it is an insult to the major water savings made in the GAB and the goodwill of farmers to cap and pipe their bores.

Senator Heffernan said the NSW Government will soon resort to "selling anything that's not bolted down" and wants the Federal Government to put a stop to the auction.

"The science on the recharge in the GAB is not even known," Senator Heffernan said.

"To sell off the savings when millions of dollars has been spent creating them is bizarre and an insult to the logic of the savings and the goodwill of the farmers who have done this work at their own expense.

"Farmers have been doing all the good work in this area; now the Government is coming in and robbing Mother Nature. Those savings belong underground – permanently."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This scheme's tenet since inception has been to stop the waste of water from the basin, not in terms of volume, but in pressure.

The driving force is the head differential. Having open bores means lowering the available pressure to drive the system. With the capping of the bores and advent of solar pumps etc and increased natural pressure, the piping of the bore drains now allows much more certainty that the Basin will last for another 200 years at least.

The auctioning of ficticious volumetric savings is just a mechanism to transfer the millions of tax payers dollars already spent, to that sector of business which sees profit as paramount above all else.

Of course the Gov't will also pick up a nice bonus on the way through.

Posted by VTM, 12/06/2009 6:51:42 AM
Can anybody throw a bit more light on this system of capping and piping the GAB water for me please?

When was this started?

What a wonderful idea it has been! Where is the main recharge for this terrific source?

Posted by downtoearth, 12/06/2009 9:19:46 AM
Dear VTM: Why would anybody be interested in saving pressure per se? I thought that with continued outflows of water from the uncontrolled earlier system, levels of water and water pressure were falling overall in the Basin.

This meant in some areas old bores were "drying up" and water could only be accessed by pumping. But again the whole point of the heavily subsidised scheme was to reduce water outflows from the system. Has this not occurred?

Posted by Blair Bartholomew, 12/06/2009 12:07:55 PM
The whoe idea of capping and piping bores was to ensure the availability of water to those graziers that rely sometimes solely on this water for their needs, be it for stock and also domestic water. To sell this water would make the whole scheme to me seem somewhat worthless. Just another way for the state government to make money at the expense of farmers and graziers. Once again a pencil pushing bureaucrat making his job secure.
Posted by concerned, 12/06/2009 5:01:08 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
The area covered by the Great Artesian Basin.
The area covered by the Great Artesian Basin.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
08 June, 2009
04 June, 2009
POLL
Q: Should the Senate reject the federal Government's proposed Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) legislation?

Yes, reject it: the Senate should vote against the legislation passed last week by the House of Representatives.
(62.7%)

No, vote for it: the legislation should be passed by the Senate.
(11.6%)

Postpone it: Senate should wait till after Copenhagen Summit.
(25.7%)

Total Votes: 723
Poll Date: 08 June, 2009

Most popular articles


Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...