News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Garrett rejects application to import bumblebees 

Garrett rejects application to import bumblebees

27 Oct, 2008 07:56 AM
Environment Minister, Peter Garrett has rejected a request to allow the live import of large earth bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) into Australia.

Mr Garrett said a plan by representatives of the hydroponics industry to allow the bees to be brought into Australia for crop pollination in greenhouses could have posed a serious risk to the Australian environment, native bee populations and native bird species.

"As we've seen with animals like the cane toad, originally brought to Australia to deal with pests in sugar cane crops, the introduction of alien species into Australia can have serious environmental consequences," Mr Garrett said.

"While I appreciate the potential benefits of improved pollination for the hydroponic industry, the national environmental legislation requires me to adopt a precautionary approach to any proposal to introduce a new species into Australia.

"The scientific evidence and advice I have received suggests that the environmental and economic risks of a large earth bumblebee population spreading throughout mainland Australia are significant.

"No matter how hard we try to contain them to greenhouses the risk of their escape into the environment are too great."

Mr Garrett cited the escape of bumblebees from greenhouses in a number of countries, including Japan and Israel, despite strategies to contain them.

"The illegal introduction of the bees into Tasmania in the 1990s saw their rapid and widespread establishment – something that could easily happen again throughout southern Australia," he said.

"Because these bees are such effective pollinators they have the potential to contribute to the rapid spread of weeds, including exotic species that have not yet become established.

"And because of their resilience to temperatures and adaptability, these bees would compete with native species for food."

A similar proposal to import live large earth bumblebees was put up for public comment in 2006 and was rejected by all states and territories.

The large earth bumblebee is listed as a potentially threatening process in Victoria as a key threatening process in New South Wales and an invasive alien species in Japan.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
For once I agree with the Environment Minister. This is a ridiculous idea. Now if he can just turn his attention to dealing with the current Cane Toad issue, Australia will be much better off.
Posted by Rudderless, 27/10/2008 10:07:52 PM
Here, here Mr Garrett, again Australia would be opening the doors to an undetermined and possibly devastating conclusion. Years down the track, what are we going to bring in to kill the bees..........
Posted by amgawrit@aol.com, 28/10/2008 2:44:31 AM
Yes, the bumblebees are widespread in Tasmania. I have them in the bush in Liffey, Tasmania. I am surprised to read that Garrett says they were introduced illegally to Tas. At the time I recall that their trial introduction into tomato hothouses was publicised and appeared to have the agreement of a state government department. Subsequently they escaped and began spreading through the island.
Posted by Garry, 28/10/2008 3:39:14 AM
To compare this to cane toads shows how we have idiots making important decisions in the running of our country. He obviously has no understanding of the process where some of Australia's best scientific minds worked through the processes.
Posted by jim, 28/10/2008 6:25:31 AM
simple solution, move the hydroponics to tasmania.
Posted by Scott, 28/10/2008 1:56:32 PM
Jim, the only idiots around in this instance are the ones that proposed the introduction of the bees in the first place and those that support the idea. Congratulations Mr Garrett for a good decision. The proponents obviously have not yet come across rabbits, foxes, prickly pear, cane toads, and at least one person hasn't noticed how often best scientific minds' null hypotheses turn out to be disproven.
Posted by Walter, 28/10/2008 6:52:57 PM
It's not correct to say bumblebees were introduced into Tasmania illegally. According to the P Schmid-Hempel study, 'Invasion success of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, despite a drastic genetic bottleneck', genetic data suggest that the introduction must have happened around late 1991, and was the result of very few, perhaps only two, individuals arriving in Tasmania. These founders came from the New Zealand population. Specimens were first recorded in Battery Point near the dock area of Hobart in 1992 (Semmens et al., 1993). Schmid-Hempel speculates about a possible purposeful introduction, but the most likely scenario is bumblebee queens accidentally travelled on freight ships travelling between New Zealand and Tasmania. Schmid-Hempel further state that queens are quite capable of shutting down their activities and remain quiescent in the cold and for many days even outside the usual hibernation cycle. They could easily travel, for example, on board ocean going vessels for considerable distances. While environmental activists in lofty positions are quick to point the finger at greenhouse tomato growers, there is no evidence to support this wild claim. I am not aware of any Tasmanian grower who use bumblebees for pollination (there are only 18 growers), despite their presence in Tasmania. The Minister's obviously didn't read the scientific data.
Posted by Casper, 9/11/2008 9:40:41 AM
Casper must think that all ships and other boats travelling between Australia and New Zealand arrive in Hobart. If this theory of inadvertent migration is even remotely plausible, we should have the presence of the bumblebee in every Australian state.
Posted by Denis, 23/12/2008 9:08:56 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Should there be mandatory labelling laws to advise consumers if food contains ingredients from genetically modified (GM) crops?

Yes
(86.9%)

No
(11.1%)

Undecided
(1.9%)

Total Votes: 1507
Poll Date: 27 October, 2008

Most popular articles


Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...