News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Garrett launches major feral cull 

Garrett launches major feral cull

04 Jul, 2009 05:54 PM
ANIMALS are to be both cherished and terminated in large numbers under the Federal Government's latest round of funding for environment projects.

The fates of a veritable Noah's Ark of beasts, including feral camels, cane toads, island-based rodents and the ubiquitous rabbit, were sealed yesterday when the Environment Minister, Peter Garrett, announced $403 million in spending under its Caring for our Country program.

Native species can expect to benefit from an intensified war on invasive animals, along with grazing animals, which would theoretically mean less competition for fodder.

Feral camels are top of the "to-shoot" list, in what Mr Garrett claimed would be the "most significant" effort to control their numbers since the animals were introduced in the 19th century. The Sydney Morning Herald was pushing for camel importation to ease outback transport problems in 1837, and the first dromedary, named Harry, arrived from the Canary Islands in 1840.

Within a few decades stray camels were going feral, and the Government estimates there are now a million of them roving an area of 3.3 million square kilometres in central and northern Australia.

A $19 million program aims to thin out camels to a population density of one every 10 square kilometres in "selected areas", Mr Garrett said.

Thousands of cane toads will also be put to the sword in an attempt to stem their advance any further into northern NSW, with $2 million going to community groups to bolster their various anti-toad campaigns.

Rats are also in the gunsights, with plans to eradicate them, or at least seriously deplete their numbers, on eight islands. Mutton Bird Island, a haven for migrating birds near Coffs Harbour, is included in the rat cull plan.

About 1200 community groups will get access to some sort of funding under the four-year plan, along with 12,000 farmers who are undertaking soil conservation, water recycling and land restoration work.

Mr Garrett said that $51.8 million would be allocated to improving water quality on the Great Barrier Reef, by working with farmers to reduce polluted run-off.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size



RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Where has Mr Garrett been? We have been trying to eliminate these animals for a long time. It really is funny to watch the immature urban majority wrestle and fail with logic and common sense, when dealing with problems outside the urban fringe.
Posted by rod, 5/07/2009 9:57:37 AM
Whilst I advocate culling, why should Garrett stop short with these animals - camels, rodents, rabbits and toads.

Why not include the "Crocodile"? This animal is responsible for the taking of human lives and decimating the barramundi and mud crabs populations in our rivers, because the croc's food chain is diminishing in their growing numbers.

Posted by frank, 5/07/2009 11:13:08 AM
It's a shame all that food is going to be shot and left to feed the wild dogs and help them multiply. All this money and waste, while in other countries people starve.
Posted by Archibald, 5/07/2009 6:06:48 PM
I would have thought the amplifying detrimental impact of feral cats on biodiversity and ecological balance, allbeit difficult to specifically measure, would be the greatest scourge on the Australian bush. Pity it's in the too hard basket.
Posted by ag7luke, 5/07/2009 6:39:38 PM
I have quite a few rabbits on my place. Do I get assistance? Who are the groups to be funded? Can an individual get assistance or do I have to fund it all myself?
Posted by David, 6/07/2009 8:58:58 AM
Garrett should start the cull in Canberra and include himself!
Posted by tigerdicky, 6/07/2009 9:47:45 AM
Surely it shouldn't cost the taxpayer $51million to clean off the government benches and start again?
Posted by Andrew Phillips, 6/07/2009 3:08:38 PM
Most other places call them resources and utilise them to advantage. Not in good old beuracratic Ausstralia. We spend multi millions studying them, protecting them and trying to kill them.

Think of this - if we spent the money on R&D and financial support for utalising our feral animals as a resource instead - I suspect we would be much better off.

Posted by feathers, 6/07/2009 3:55:01 PM
What are we caring for the country for? To help our grandchildren eat and survive or the roos?

The big two- legged rabbit that hops is the biggest pest these days destroying fences, cars, crops and pastures. Do you know they need a gallon of water a day allocation in national parks?

Mr Garret is no friend of food security for humans - no he is a fur hugging, tree hugging, politician.

Posted by Common Cents, 7/07/2009 9:43:19 AM
I have been chasing my tail between the various State and Federal government departments to find the key to the door to obtain a win-win outcome by employing up to 500 people, as well as address the feral camel problem in central Australia.

With a shoot policy, it's not only very upsetting for tourist and indigenous Australians, but also causes a major buildup of wild dogs by creating a massive food supply in the outback.

On our own station, we are losing 100 lambs per year for every wild dog not yet trapped. As major exporters, we have been exporting camel meat for over five years and recently we won a North African government tender to supply over 1200 tonnes of camel meat this year - and the promise of larger contracts in years to come.

So, with a lot more coordination between government departments, we can create a win-win situation for the benefit of all concerned.

Posted by Blackie, 8/07/2009 7:34:43 PM, on Stock & Land
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
29 June, 2009
02 July, 2009
03 July, 2009
POLL
Q: Has the 'ute-gate' fake email affair in Federal Parliament changed your voting intentions?

Yes - I am more likely to vote Liberal/National
(22.8%)

Yes - I am more likely to vote Labor
(10.9%)

Yes - I am less likely to vote for either major party
(11.3%)

No - it has not affected my voting position
(55%)

Total Votes: 906
Poll Date: 28 June, 2009

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural MON0152
 
Small Farms Expo
 
Irwin HunterIrwin Hunter
 
Freedom Tanks
 
WA Merino Magazine
 
Win a Leica Mojo Mini
 
FBG
 
photo gallery


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...