News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 High-end consumers the target for high-cost Aus farmers 

High-end consumers the target for high-cost Aus farmers

23 Jun, 2009 09:29 AM
Australian agricultural will do well if it can work on producing products that are quintessentially Australian in order to develop much-needed high-value markets.

The key note speaker to the inaugural National Farmers Federation congress, Professor David Hughes, yesterday told more than 300 farmers in Brisbane that as Australian farmers are not the lowest cost producers of food in the world, they need to invest more time and effort pitching their produce to higher-income consumers.

He believes Australian farmers can do well in a growing income market, offsetting the loss of market share to low-cost countries like Brazil and Chile.

His message on the opportunities for Australian agriculture in an increasingly hungry world was a simple one: "It's fine to have poor friends, but it's better to have rich customers," he said.

"Looking across the major commodity sectors, I would bet you're not the lowest cost producers anymore.

"And if you're not the lowest-cost producer what's plan B because when it comes to a bear-knuckle fight on the commodity markets, it's the low-cost guys that are going to win."

Professor Hughes – a British-based expert on global food issues - said from the Australian agricultural perspective in a hungry world, farmers need customers with income.

"Those with income not only want an astonishingly good feed, they want low cost too, but they value things other than just low price.

"And that gives you an opportunity to do well in a growing income market."

He said Australia should be targeting those consumer nations that want a little more than just the lower cost of food in what they're buying.

"Australians can give them a good deal on price, but you can also give them more."

Professor Hughes believes the growth in meat consumption was driven by parallel growths in income and population.

But he warned farmers that they risked losing international competitiveness to those lower cost countries if they could not find ways to grow market share and make a profit in the process.

Professor Hughes sees a declining global market share for Australia's classic commodity markets like grains, beef and dairy.

While this may not mean sales aren't going up, the global market share is going down, he says.

"International competitiveness is measured by if you can grow global market share profitably," he said.

"You're probably losing market share. You must be. If I look at market share – not sales – Brazil is increasing market share.

"We've got to look at that and address it through time.

"I don't see Australia as being a big international player the horticultural sector which is largely geared to service the domestic market and occasionally when there are surpluses it's shipped off.

"The Aussie food manufacturing sector focuses on the domestic market. They're uncomfortable with the export market.

"But this restricts the value-adding options you have with the great ingredients you produce."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Professor Hughes's comments could go a lot further than the brief statements in this article. How do farmers raise the 'value' of their products? How to tap into those higher income consumers, as well as increasing demand for their products (food) amongst a wider cross section of the community? How to appeal to consumers who want an 'astonishingly good feed', and who are not just interested in low quality, low priced food??? In order to install value and quality back into our food production systems, farming with the end consumer in mind should be a priority. If farmers are set on using damaging inputs that produces food of inferior quality, then they will be stuck in a vicious cycle ie spending large amounts on costs of production (crap fertilisers and the partnered use of pesticides) and receiving a low price for their commodities (as well as destroying their biggest and most important asset - their soil).

An effective and widely proven approach to counter this type of 'MORE-ON' industrialised agriculture is to focus on soil health, thereby growing food with nutrient density and without chemical residues. Biologically based farming methods work with nature and her many intricate and inter-connected systems, with a fundamental goal of capturing the sun's energy via plants and transfering/ cycling this carbon through a rich soil biology.

Dr Chopra is currently travelling in Australia and exposing the dodgy and unhealthy side of current farming practices (with Monsanto and co at the core of the problem). As he and many many others are saying - farming NEEDS to change in a more holistic, integrated and intelligent way. GM food is the biggest folly and band-aid fix that has been rolled out yet. The consequences of farmers accepting this rubbish based propaganda could have massive implications for us all. This is certainly NOT a way of putting value back into food and food production, and farmers being paid reasonable and fair prices.

Posted by brett sanders, 23/06/2009 9:45:15 AM
It is a matter of fact, and in the absence of any substantive evidence to the contrary, not many farmers here or else where in the world have any direct dealing with ‘high end’ consumers as such. Professor David Hughes doesn’t seem to realise that the ownership of any saleable goods transfers at the farm gate and usually through an intermediary, or processor. It is they who then in turn that deal with any ‘high end’ consumer not the farmer. The perception that farmers deal directly with consumers is a misnomer perpetrated by peak industry councils in their endeavours to bridge the so called the city country divide. The misnomer is that the poor city consumer when purchasing a fresh food product think that they are purchasing the product directly from the farmer.
Posted by truth in labelling, 23/06/2009 1:18:33 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
The key note speaker to the inaugural National Farmers Federation congress, Professor David Hughes
The key note speaker to the inaugural National Farmers Federation congress, Professor David Hughes
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
22 June, 2009
21 June, 2009
19 June, 2009
POLL
Q: Is the Grains Council of Australia worth saving?

Yes
(31%)

No
(50.9%)

Undecided
(18.1%)

Total Votes: 332
Poll Date: 21 June, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...