News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Horse industry backs levy 

Horse industry backs levy

09 Sep, 2008 06:51 AM
The Australian Horse Industry Council has thrown its backing behind an "equitable and broad-based industry levy", which will ensure government assistance for the horse industry in the event of a future emergency disease outbreak.

The passage of Government legislation last week aimed at establishing a levy to pay for future outbreak management prompted an angry response from many readers.

But AHIC president, Dr Barry Smyth, says the Horse Disease Response Levy Bills are an step to enable the horse industry to become a party to the Emergency Animal Disease Response Agreement (EADRA).

"Through EADRA, the industry is guaranteed the support and financial assistance of government in sharing the burden of fighting future emergency disease outbreaks," Dr Smyth said.

"Successful eradication of emergency diseases also eliminates ongoing disease management costs, providing further incentive for the industry to become a party to EADRA."

The levy is to be set at zero, which means that no levy will be payable until after an emergency disease response is over.

The agreement specifies that industry will be consulted up front about the amount of any levy.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Long overdue. Definitely a fair move for the horse industry to contribute its fair share. If there was money for better preparation we wouldn't have had such a long delay in moving horses under the EI schmozzle.
Posted by POK, 10/09/2008 5:59:06 AM
The thin end of the wedge. The predominate reason for the expensive insurance premiums on any horse related gathering is that the industry is deemed to be of high risk which means ALL horse owners suffer. By all means let the "industry" pay but as sure as god made little apples so will the rest.
Posted by Realist, 10/09/2008 6:33:23 AM
Compulsory ID must follow, and therefore annual registration for every nag. It's a cost we can do without. Stay clear of government if you can.
Posted by shirly, 10/09/2008 8:36:10 AM
Why should owners of horses who do not import or export horses have to cover any costs associated with the importation of diseases. If a horse racing stud or breeder wants to move animals internationally, they should bear the full cost with either insurances or a levy for each movement. It is TOTALLY unfair to burden all horse owners with a tedious and costly system when they are not the beneficiaries of the huge profits that some in the industry make when they move animals to/from other countries. In addition if the cause of the problem is related to poor quarantine procedures then the government should bear the cost as we elect them to do it right. As with all industries, those that benefit the most are trying to get the little guy to bear the cost. Wake up horse owners, do we want to subsidise the horse racing industry in Australia?
Posted by gregxxv, 10/09/2008 3:35:35 PM
The Australian Horse Industry Council has sold out horse owners and gone with the bureaucrats and politicians. The Government will always fight emergency disease outbreaks like they just did in QLD. They can't simply let horses die for both commercial reasons and also cruelty reasons. The AHIC fell for a false argument.
Posted by Helen, 10/09/2008 3:42:24 PM
Thank you AHIC for showing leadership.

The horse industry has been sadly lacking such. Hopefully over time personal agendas and emotions will move aside and sensible and responsible horse ownership and industry representation will evolve.

Posted by sugna, 11/09/2008 7:44:18 AM
I see that if and when a levie gets imposed it will be a big head ache for the governing bodies as they will have to have every horse in the country microchiped to be able to fairly apply any levie. Maybe!
Posted by Horse, 14/09/2008 7:37:30 AM
Perhaps if the government continues to pay for the cost of disease outbreaks they will take a lot more interest in AQIS in future? Recoup direct eradication costs maybe, but non-commercial horse owners should neither recieve, nor pay, for assistance grants. The EI outbreak cost $100m for eradication & $350m for assistance.
Posted by Bill, 14/09/2008 1:00:19 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: If a Federal election was held next weekend, for which party would you vote?

Labor
(12.2%)

Liberal
(38.2%)

Nationals
(27.5%)

Greens
(8.6%)

Family First
(1.7%)

Independent
(7.3%)

Undecided/Other
(4.5%)

Total Votes: 1040
Poll Date: 07 September, 2008

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...