News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Lib-Nat war: Schultz "should be shot" 

Lib-Nat war: Schultz "should be shot"

22 Oct, 2008 02:43 PM
The federal Liberal MP Alby Schultz has hit back at a suggestion by the NSW National Party leader that he should be shot for helping an independent during the weekend Port Macquarie by-election campaign.

The National's leader Andrew Stoner said earlier today of Mr Schultz's support for independent Peter Besseling: "If I had my way, I'd march him out at dawn, put a blindfold on him and shoot him."

Mr Stoner said he had personally spoken to federal Liberal leader Malcolm Turnbull about Mr Schultz and Mr Turnbull had told him he had had harsh words with him.

But Mr Schultz fired back this afternoon, calling Mr Stoner's comments "despicable", "offensive" and "irresponsible".

"I cannot believe that a leader of a political party at any level in Australian society today, given the impression that children take of matters related to violence and the amount of violence that's occurring in the community, would make such an irresponsible comment," he said.

"I'm not sure whether Mr Stoner is under considerable stress but if Mr Stoner is making those sorts of despicable comments about marching me out and blindfolding me and shooting me because I spent one hour in a pre-poll booth in Port Macquarie, and he's using that one hour to try and justify another loss of seat by the National Party in New South Wales, then the man really has got a problem."

Mr Schultz added: "Having said that, I'd like to compliment him for giving me the credibility of influencing 48,000 constituents of the Port Macquarie electorate who Mr Stoner has despicably trivialised in terms of their ability and intelligence to go to the ballot box.

"I find the comments offensive personally but more importantly I find the comments not fitting of a person who seeks to be the deputy premier of NSW."

Mr Schultz said he had not had a one-on-one or face-to-face conversation with Mr Turnbull about the Port Macquarie issue.

"He did make a short comment to me which I reacted to in a private meeting," he said.

"That's vastly different to the professional way in which a leader of a political party ... would talk privately to his backbenchers.

"I haven't had a situation where I had a private meeting or even the leader of the opposition request me to attend his office to talk to me about the issue."

He said the "short comment" was about the way in which he reacted to matters indirectly associated with Port Macquarie.

Mr Schultz said he would be happy to participate in a meeting if Turnbull desired one.

Mr Stoner has fronted a press conference this afternoon, "clarifying" his comments were a "joke" with journalists and saying if anyone took offence, he apologised.

"If things become that serious in politics, if you can't take a joke ... I'm not seriously going to march someone out and shoot them," he said.

"I'm not into guns, I'm not into killing people, it's nonsense."

Mr Stoner also revealed today that Andrew Fraser, the National Party deputy leader who tackled minister Joe Tripodi, in the chamber, has been cut loose from a leadership position.

Mr Stoner called a surprise leadership spill this morning, which lead to his deputy losing his position.

Mr Stoner won the backing of the party room and rising star of the party and shadow leader in the house, Adrian Piccoli, has won the deputy's job from Mr Fraser.

Mr Stoner's move comes after a disappointing result for the National Party on the weekend when they failed to win the seat of Port Macquarie from independent Peter Besseling.

A spokesman for Mr Stoner said he called on the spill to reaffirm support for the "direction he was taking the party", following the Port Macquarie result.

The move was intended to axe Mr Fraser who had been viewed as a liability.

Mr Fraser had to admit in 2005 to drinking in the parliamentary bar before he chased Mr Tripodi and attempted to tackle him during a debate on the Pacific Highway.

He has often been seen as the key weak link in the opposition's senior ranks.

Mr Stoner told the party room he was going to continue to push for changes to get an improved National Party team in the lead-up to the 2011 election.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1



RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Both Alby and Andrew are excellent men. Both are outstanding Australians, with much to offer as leaders of our communities.

They are the type of leader that makes Australia a brilliant place to live in. I can only imagine how incredible a combined party of Libs and Nats joined together in NSW would be, as has been done so succesfully recently in Qld.

Maybe Andrew might consider apologising, and maybe Alby might consider accepting it, and we can all move on to higher ground of decency and respect for each other in the light of trying to serve the people of Australia better.

In this regard, both these men need to be thanked and respected for their excellent and genuine contributions to our nation.

Posted by chick Olsson, 22/10/2008 9:03:57 PM
If Alby has any credibility at all, he should be the one apologising for being so bloody stupid, what a dope!

The only way that the Libs will ever hold government in NSW is with the support of the National Party.

So get with the program Alby - or become irrelevant to the very people who put you into your seat.

Posted by walta, 22/10/2008 9:58:55 PM
Nationals, do not merge with the Liberals, under any circumstances.

They are treacherous, aligned to Big Business and City Centric.

Posted by Realist, 22/10/2008 10:19:26 PM
If the Liberals are serious about having a coalition, yes, Alby should be shot. It amounts to treachery in my books. He would seem to me as a traitor, and I don't blame Stoner for being angry and frustrated.
Posted by Bushy, 23/10/2008 8:45:48 AM
Mr Stoner had every right to say what he did - in the old days, that's how traitors were dealt with.

Alby also backed destroying the wheat industry.


Posted by Mark, 23/10/2008 8:54:26 AM
no shooting please / just mules him
Posted by capt al, 23/10/2008 11:08:44 AM
Tell me what will be different if there is a merger? Same policies in coalition and in opposition, just less administration costs and costs to the taxpayer to support a separate party. Move on!
Posted by I'lb, 23/10/2008 12:24:04 PM
Dont miss, you will need your ammo for the rest of the traitors.
Posted by bullseye, 23/10/2008 4:36:12 PM
Hello Folks, I think you should all take a deep breath and chill out a little. If The Nats and The Libs are to be a powerful force in charge of this nation's destiny, then they will have to come together at some stage. Even intimating a violent agenda is wrong, and shows the absolute minority side of the wonderful National Party. You might all consider John F Kennedy's words in the 1960s when he said, "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." Come on Folks, move forward. You are all much better than this.
Posted by chick olsson, 23/10/2008 8:25:09 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Andrew Stoner (left) says Alby Schultz (right) should be shot.
Andrew Stoner (left) says Alby Schultz (right) "should be shot".
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Who will receive your first vote in the AWI board elections?

Brian van Rooyen
(19.7%)

George Falkiner
(14.1%)

Chris Abell
(3.8%)

Will Roberts
(7%)

Ken Boundy
(1.6%)

David Webster
(7.8%)

Robyn Clubb
(3.5%)

Meredith Sheil
(12.7%)

John Keniry
(5.4%)

Laurence Modiano
(24.3%)

Total Votes: 370
Poll Date: 19 October, 2008

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural MON0152
 
Freedom Tanks
 
Irwin HunterIrwin Hunter
 
Small Farms Expo
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
FBG
 
WA Merino Magazine
 
photo gallery


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...