News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 More wind farms coming to rural Australia 

More wind farms coming to rural Australia

02 Dec, 2008 10:31 AM
More wind farms are coming to rural areas of NSW and Victoria, following a Federal Government approval of a Spanish plan to spend $1.9 billion on turbines at a number of sites.

Spanish firm Union Fenosa intends to invest $1.9 billion in a portfolio of seven Australian wind farms to be built in two stages.

The Government says the investment will create 225 jobs in the initial construction phase plus 40 operational positions.

Trade Minister Simon Crean said the venture would boost Australia's clean energy capabilities and help to reduce the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions.

"As well as directly creating badly needed jobs in regional areas, Union Fenosa Wind Australia's facilities will boost growth in the local industry, creating new business and jobs to supply parts, maintenance and other services during their whole life cycle," Mr Crean said.

"These facilities will make a significant contribution to the Rudd Government’s renewable energy target that commits to at least 20pc of Australia’s electricity supply being generated from renewable sources by 2020."

Facilitation of the Union Fenosa investment was supported by Austrade, the Australian Government's trade and investment development agency.

The electricity produced by the first three wind farms in Phase 1 would supply the annual consumption of 186,000 households.

On completion in 2013, the seven wind farms will represent an additional 850 megawatts generation capacity to Australia's existing wind generation capacity of 824MW.

Phase one of the project will see the construction of wind farms at Hawkesdale and Ryan Corner in Victoria, and Crookwell, NSW.

The first phase is due for completion in 2010 and permits have been granted.

Phase Two will see the construction of wind farms at Tarrone, Berrybank and Darlington in Victoria, as well as Paling Yards in NSW.

The second phase is due for completion in 2013.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Just what the rural community of australia want, more massive useless towers that don't provide a constant flow of power and do nothing to provide energy reliability. Not to mention devaluation of property and wrecking communities.
Posted by pete, 2/12/2008 5:55:35 PM
More stupidity from the governments of australia to push these silly proposals onto country australians. What can we expect in 10 years time? these wind turbines have been proven to be useless in europe for 20 years where they continue to build coal powered generating systems as the wind turbines aren't working, not to mention reducing green house emmisions. Farmers that lease land to companies with $1 paid up capital should be extremely cautious, lease conditions that include the farmers taking all legal liability and having to remove the turbines should be avoided at all costs, so should living in an area with a noise level above the epa prescribed levels. Wind farms are nothing but a scam designed to extract money from taxpayers with no return and to show some love to the city greenies.
Posted by carly, 2/12/2008 6:08:52 PM
The wind farms are opportunities for certain companies to gain research funding from Government. No sensible private business would put money into these schemes.
Posted by Len, 3/12/2008 1:11:10 PM
Wind turbines are heavily subsidised by all electricity consumers. Did you know that they have to be shadowed by Open Cycle Gas Turbines which cost up to $1000 per MW hour to provide power to ensure the power supply in the grid is stable and supply matches demand. Increasing fluctuations in supply due to wind power will increase demand for this OCGT power and you will pay.
Posted by bob, 3/12/2008 7:41:06 PM
I wouldn't like to be one of the 186,000 homes powered by these wind farms. how can i make sure mine is not one of them and that i can get a reliable supply? I don't want my food going off when the wind stops and so does the fridge. much better to have reliable supply than intermittant stupidity.
Posted by michelle, 4/12/2008 10:51:08 AM
It never ceases to be amaze me at the total ignorance of the anti-wind lobby. Or is it just the promulgation of Landscape Guardian misinformation?

Fact 1. All wind energy investments are made by private companies for profit

Fact 2. If the past 20 years in Europe had been a failure, then wind energy would not be the fastest growing private energy industry in the world.

Fact 3. There have been no increase in so called back up power as a result of Victorian and South Australian wind farms.

Fact 4. Wind energy has developed because is it the most viable proven renewable energy technology available today.

Fact 5 VENCORP the Victorian government authority for planning energy networks has stated that between 3000 MW and 4000 MW of wind energy could be integrated into Victoria.

Fact 6. Wind energy abates greenhouse gas emissions. In Victoria this is about 1 tonne for every MWh of generation.

This can only be ignored by climate skeptics that are currently resurfacing from their holes.

Posted by Joe, 5/12/2008 4:39:40 PM
Joe, it looks like you've been on the payroll of a wind company or the victorian state government. Can you please state anywhere in the world where wind has shut down a coal fired or nuclear powered station? Wind energy has been a total flop in europe where thay are now building more coal powered stations as wind is to unreliable and as emission statistics show, emissions have continued to rise at a higher rate than before wind energy became highly subsidised leading to its proliferation. There has been no need for back up power because wind only provides 100mw of power in vic, and only provides 20% of that most of the time, so roughly 20mw at the best of times. Hardly enough to need back up! get your facts right and stop trying to fool the public into believing your wind industry dribble that is designed to keep your subsidy going. Your stating victorian government studies! hehe, you just lost all credibility. Sounds like the water pipe all over again!
Posted by phil, 7/12/2008 8:36:53 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Would grain growers be better or worse off if AWB and ABB merge?

Better off
(48.7%)

Worse off
(36.5%)

No change
(14.8%)

Total Votes: 337
Poll Date: 30 November, 2008

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural MON0152
 
Small Farms Expo
 
Irwin HunterIrwin Hunter
 
Freedom Tanks
 
WA Merino Magazine
 
Win a Leica Mojo Mini
 
FBG
 
photo gallery


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...