News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Murray tsunami poised - and regulated 

Murray tsunami poised - and regulated

17 Mar, 2010 10:14 AM
THE Murray-Darling Basin is set to be flushed with thousands of gigalitres of water from the recent Queensland floods, the size of which means control of flows down the river system will be taken from NSW hands.

As a result of the inland tsunami working its way down the Darling, the Murray-Darling Basin Authority is preparing to take control of up to 1300 gigalitres of water set to be stored in NSW.

The weather bureau predicts 6125 gigalitres of water runoff has been generated by the floods - assuming there is no more rain - with a large proportion to flow into the Darling.

The NSW Office of Water now expects all four Menindee Lakes in western NSW - which are used to regulate flows to South Australia and Victoria - will be filled to their 1680-gigalitre capacity. Menindee's storage can be pushed to about 2000 gigalitres, four times the capacity of Sydney Harbour, in times of heavy flows. It is now expected the floodwater will push the lakes to that limit and potentially beyond.

The authority takes control of all water in Menindee Lakes above a 640-gigalitre trigger. Menindee now has 584 gigalitres from the January floods. The authority will return control of Menindee Lakes to NSW when the water drops below 480 gigalitres.

A spokesman for the authority confirmed yesterday that it expected to take control of the water in mid-April when the floodwater hit the lakes.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What was Pennys part in getting this water . Was it part of her buy back or has she begun to realise how rediculous it is for man to take any of the credit or glory.
Posted by richie 10, 17/03/2010 10:02:17 AM
Silly thinking richie 10 Obviously you have no idea how the psyche of these ratbags in Canberra works. Come to think about it - nor do I, but my guess is she'll want to claim some glory and/or save some face.
Posted by daw, 17/03/2010 6:05:20 PM
Whats ridiculous is that one private company is diverting more water for itself than the total amount that will flow to South Australia's environment and thousands of irrigators. Which I might add, are still on restrictions of 60% of their entitlement.
Posted by fridgimus, 17/03/2010 6:28:49 PM
Question. If the climate doomsayers reckon they know what the weather is going to do in 50 - 100 years, and they keep bashing our ears with that they can, how come they couldn't advise the government all this rain was going to occur (which is seasonal) and all this water would appear in the river systems. That would have alleviated the need for Ms Wong to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to reserve water for environmental flows... Or is it a case that no-one really knows beyond 4 - 5 days what the weather may do and it is facetious to suggest otherwise.
Posted by mbh, 18/03/2010 4:46:28 AM
I heard a report in December saying the monsoons would be late and very poor - well, hello!! Best wet season in twenty years, like the ones we had in the fifties. They can't forecast tomorrow, let alone long term. I know it is a difficult science, but please don't feed us this stuff that the "science is settled". The weather is never settled - the old saying "changeable as the weather" still rings true.
Posted by Concerned Northerner, 18/03/2010 5:22:56 AM
Climate and weather are two completely different debates. Unfortunately most bloggers do not understand this.
Posted by Understanding, 18/03/2010 5:55:31 AM
Hi there "Understanding". More information please. Everyone is interested in validation, hence the questions from bloggers.
Posted by mbh, 18/03/2010 6:02:17 AM
This is the extra info. Climate changes slowly over time and has nothing to do with short term weather patterns. Droughts break with above average rainfall, but this does not mean the climate has suddenly changed. A few hot or cold days does not mean the climate has changed. The weather is just the mix that occurs within a general pattern which is the climate. I would hate to try and predict the actual weather in South West Qld over the next few months or the next 12 months. However I am confidant that it will be hotter and drier than South East Qld because it has a different climate. Time may prove this last statement to be wrong in relation to the weather that does occur, but as a generalised comment, which is the climate, it will be spot on. What drives the day to day weather is not the same as what drives the climate. If the weather should be so easy to predict, then why does it rain on one property and not the one next door?
Posted by Understanding, 18/03/2010 9:24:00 AM
If all goes well with the current cyclone we could see a third flush of the river system which would be absolutely wonderful. A wet inland invariably has spin offs for other areas by way of evaporation let alone the jobs and the boost to the environment.
Posted by High Country Gent, 18/03/2010 10:42:24 AM
fridgimus: Who is the private company you're referring to? I can't think of anyone that big.
Posted by Qlander, 19/03/2010 9:32:56 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Do you support the move to introduce an import risk analysis on beef from BSE-affected countries?

Yes
(74.6%)

No
(22.4%)

Uncommitted
(3.1%)

Total Votes: 389
Poll Date: 15 March, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...