News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Natives trees to thrive under climate change 

Natives trees to thrive under climate change

18 Sep, 2008 08:20 AM
As the world warms, Australian trees will grow faster and larger and become more water-efficient, research suggests.

Giant, climate-controlled tents that simulate the carbon dioxide-heavy conditions expected in the second half of the 21st century have been erected over gum trees by University of Western Sydney researchers.

Air inside the tents is carefully regulated to raise the carbon dioxide content to over 600 parts per million - above the predicted "tipping point" for highly damaging climate change.

The results suggest the hardy eucalypts will survive and maybe even prosper, even as surrounding ecosystems collapse.

"The trees are basically taking up more carbon and using up to 25pc less water," said Professor David Tissue, a lead researcher.

"Hopefully this could have important implications for the use of plantation timber, and the way carbon sequestration is accounted."

Professor Tissue and his colleagues decided to use Sydney blue gum saplings for the trial near Richmond because the trees are commonly used in plantation forests and as carbon offsets.

Some blue gums are being raised in carbon-rich atmospheres beneath their transparent plastic tents, while others are being starved of water to simulate drought conditions.

Those given extra carbon have been shown to create more wood and lose less water by closing pores on their leaves.

But Australian native trees are not the solution to climate change, said Dr Bert Drake of the Smithsonian Institute, who has maintained the world's longest-running carbon sequestration experiment in the US since 1987.

"The largest factor determining the uptake of carbon dioxide is still the availability of water, and that is a major issue from Australia," said Dr Drake, who is in Sydney to discuss carbon sinks at a Whitlam Institute forum tonight.

"None of the data suggests that plants can absorb enough of the carbon dioxide to compensate for the amount we are putting into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels."

If the amount of carbon dioxide being put in the atmosphere by human activity does not decline sharply over the next four decades, by the second half of the century the global average is expected to reach the levels being simulated in the UWS experiment.

A senior CSIRO plant industry scientist, Dr Roger Gifford, said some regions would receive higher rainfall as others dried out.

But any advantages for plants were likely to be short-term.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It is a pity that the good professor didn't test some of the exotic tropical trees used for high value forestry such as teak, Pacific Rosewood, Indian Sandalwood etc. The eucalypt-centric forestry as practiced in the tropical parts of Queensland is risky as the results of cyclone Larry proved. Tropical forestry is sadly neglected by CSIRO and the Qld DPI. Research into the tropical high value species is sadly lacking and it has been left to some dedicated farm foresters to trial these species. Some of the forestry MIS companies are growing African Mahogany and Indian Sandalwood but without the research that is needed by these Govt organisations. In these times, without the R&D efforts of Govt, effective commercial forestry becomes more risky in the tropics.
Posted by Trugger, 18/09/2008 7:02:42 PM
At last someone with some common sense. The issue of carbon sequestering is dependent on water, as are a multitude of naturally occuring systems. Therefore carbon credits and trading are a very inefficient and risky business. They favour the rich and investors at the peril of taking Australia's precious and extremely valuable water resources to either make money or save money in tax breaks for all the wrong reasons.
Posted by Fred, 19/09/2008 5:36:54 AM
This factor is not confined to trees. Look at the available research. You will increase the process of respiration and increase production with elevated CO2. Research has been done and it is used in practise. 30% + increase in production. Look at most well organised indoor vegetable production operations.
Posted by GT, 19/09/2008 6:08:21 AM
Of course the trees will grow faster. Since it requires about 7 feet of vegatation to produce one foot of coal ask yourself where the 100 metre plus coal seams in Australia came from.
Posted by jaimie, 19/09/2008 7:34:19 AM
The lies continue. The temperatures aren't increasing.
Posted by Len, 19/09/2008 8:17:05 AM
I'm a little skeptical. We've had 7 yrs of drought, increased atmospheric carbon; yet heaps of trees have died (not adapted) in forests & national parks around here i.e. Central West NSW.
Posted by razor, 19/09/2008 8:56:43 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Tent city … Professor David Tissue with the University of Western Sydney's forest experiment. Photo: Sahlan Hayes.
Tent city … Professor David Tissue with the University of Western Sydney's forest experiment. Photo: Sahlan Hayes.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you believe the Rudd Government has a plan for the future development of inland Australia?

Yes
(7.1%)

No
(89.4%)

Undecided
(3.4%)

Total Votes: 757
Poll Date: 14 September, 2008

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...