News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 'Nats choose miners over food producers' 

'Nats choose miners over food producers'

27 Nov, 2008 01:06 PM
In a 'disgraceful' back down, the National Party have removed support for an amendment to the Murray Darling Water Bill that would require an independent water study before mining exploration licences could be granted.

The blast comes from Independent Member for New England, Tony Windsor, who said the Nationals had supported the amendment on two previous occasions.

“These occasions were once in the House of Representatives, when I moved it, and then yesterday in the Senate, after it was moved by Senator Bob Brown,” he said.

The amendment states that before any mining exploration licences are granted for mining activity on floodplains that have underlying groundwater systems that lead to the inflows in the Murray Darling Basin, an independent study has to take place to determine the impacts on groundwater flows and water quality and that where a risk is identified the exploration licences should not be granted.

The amendment would deliver a process whereby, prior to the granting of exploration licences, a full understanding of the science of groundwater be known.

Yesterday in the Parliament, National Senators praised the amendment and themselves for supporting it.

• Senator John Williams stated, “There is no point in compromising the prosperity of the future and the capacity to feed ourselves for the sake of a 30 year window in mining.”

• Senator Boswell said “Today we have delivered for the people of the Liverpool Plains.”

• Senator Nash said “It is about a study to be undertaken about due diligence.”

She added “Senator Brown said that it is simply good country common sense which I think encapsulates the intent of the amendment completely.”

• Senator Joyce said “I hope the message is conveyed to the people of the Caroona area that we will support them on this matter.”

“Quite clearly the Nationals have exposed their true masters, the mining companies – not country people,” Mr Windsor said.

“The Nationals now support an arrangement where exploration licences will be granted on alluvial floodplains that have underlying groundwater systems that form part of the Murray Darling system without any scientific knowledge of those systems.

“What an extraordinary contradiction of yesterday’s position.

“The position the National Party has taken today is to reinforce the existing state-based approval processes that have been shown to be flawed,” Mr Windsor said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This is disgraceful behaviour. The Nats are no longer looking after the people that they should be representing.

Nor are they concerned for the people of Australia. Murray-Darling allocations are being cut, the Liverpool Plains (in NSW) and Darling Downs under threat from mining. Obviously these people expect us to be eating contaminated imported food.

Posted by Rosemary, 27/11/2008 3:42:17 PM
Hang on. Hang on. Farming on the Liverpool Plains (NSW) has dramatically altered and interfered with surface and ground water for 150 years. That is why the MDB is in the poor condition today.

To make out mining is the villian here is stretching the facts.

No question there should be checks before any potential intereference with acquifers, but it would be better if all this energy and hot air from Windsor was directed at remediating the existing problem - over entitlement, over allocation and land degradation.

It's not as sexy and not as populist, but that's Tony.

Posted by Alex, 28/11/2008 5:04:58 AM
Bring back royalty payments to farmers and their mining rights and all these problems will disappear.

Why is there no compensation to farmers for the use of their land for other purposes in Australia? In other democratic countries mining and agriculture exist side by side and look after each other.

Royalty payments would help restore land to production again once mining is finished. This would be far better for our Australian economy and future than locking land up for the conservation of flora and fauna which then become a fire, grazing competition and predator threat to neighbours.

Posted by Common Cents, 28/11/2008 7:45:40 AM
It is inappropriate to require a water study before the granting of an Exploration Licence. The water study needs to be done at a later stage, before the granting of a Mining Lease. This Liverpool Plains case is a real problem, but for many other situations it is absolutely inappropriate to require a water study at such an early stage. In exploration for metalliferous ores, only one in several hundred Exploration Licences will lead on to a mining venture. All this proposal would do is increase the cost of exploration, and cause huge delays, and in most cases, for no benefit to anyone.
Posted by Barney, 29/11/2008 10:53:50 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Tony Windsor
Tony Windsor
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Do you believe the new board of Australian Wool Innovation can heal the rifts within the industry?

Yes
(26.9%)

No
(56.6%)

Undecided
(16.4%)

Total Votes: 438
Poll Date: 24 November, 2008

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...