News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 NSW Nats to fight merger calls 

NSW Nats to fight merger calls

16 Jul, 2008 05:34 AM
The NSW National Party will resist calls for a merger with the Liberal Party, despite the option being canvassed as a survival measure in a report to be released today.

The report on the Nationals' future, co-written by the party's former federal leader John Anderson, will warn it faces extinction like the Australian Democrats unless it merges or undergoes radical structural reform.

The two parties are merging in Queensland, albeit with in-fighting and drama, but the Nationals chairwoman in NSW, Christine Ferguson, said there was no desire to do the same in this state.

The NSW party voted overwhelmingly against a Queensland-style merger at its annual conference a month ago.

Ms Ferguson said the Coalition system in NSW was "working extremely well" and the Opposition was on track to win the state election in 2011.

"There's a need for a non-metropolitan party in NSW," she said, referring to the recent split in the federal Coalition over legislation which stripped AWB of its single-desk wheat-selling status.

The Liberals backed the bill but the Nationals opposed it.

Ms Ferguson said up to 85pc of NSW wheat farmers wanted the single desk retained and only the Nationals fought for them.

After the last federal election, Mr Anderson and the report's co-author, Michael Priebe, were asked to examine four options for the party's future: a merger, maintaining the status quo, becoming more independent, and splitting from the Coalition and going alone.

The report makes no specific recommendation but Mr Anderson is known to privately support a merger.

Federally, the Nationals have four senators and 10 MPs, of whom two senators and five MPs are from NSW.

In State Parliament, they have 13 MPs and five members of the upper house.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
How does John Anderson see that a merge with the Liberal party will be survival. The new party will be called the Liberals or something else it sure as hell won't be called the National Party. The party name goes, the members become members of another party. How does that equate to survival? Why don't all the ones wanting a merger just join the Liberal party and let those that are left get on and redefine the National Party.
Posted by Iwat, 17/07/2008 7:31:19 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you believe the creation of an emissions trading system poses a threat or opportunity for your farm business?

Threat
(59.6%)

Opportunity
(17.7%)

Unsure - more information needed
(22.7%)

Total Votes: 480
Poll Date: 13 July, 2008

Most popular articles


Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...