News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Outlook online forum - NFF answers to your questions 

Outlook online forum - NFF answers to your questions

03 Mar, 2010 11:39 AM
FarmOnline has hosted a live online forum where National Farmers' Federation economics and trade manager Charles McElhone answer your questions about what ABARE's Outlook forecasts will mean for the future of Australian agriculture.

Mr McElhone was online from 1-2pm (AEDT) to discuss the Outlook forecasts, as well as the debate on key rural issues that has taken place in Canberra.

See below for the transcript of the question and answer session.

Predictions up for discussion included ABARE's forecast that a resurgent export market will drive on-farm profitability over the next five years.

ABARE yesterday predicted that exports will jump more than $3 billion in the next four to five years, with farm exports expected to bring in about $29 billion in 2009-10 and 2010-11, before increasing more than 10 per cent to $32.2 billion in 2014-15.

Recovering economic conditions and a favourable season will underpin this growth, as Australia’s total commodity exports (including minerals, energy and agriculture) shoot up an expected 30 per cent by 2015.

Despite an increase in world supplies hampering the export potential of most grains, barley is expected to do well in 2010-11, as is rice, raw cotton, sugar, wine, live cattle and dairy products.

However, beef and veal exports will likely face pressure from herd rebuilding and stronger competition in overseas markets.

But ABARE's Outlook conference also heard yesterday that widespread rain in the past three months is expected to have only a small impact on farm incomes in 2009-10.

However, it may help in the following year ABARE’s agriculture branch manager, Bruce Bowen, said.

“Overall, broadacre farm financial performance is projected to decline in 2009-10, but not in all regions and industries,” Mr Bowen said.

“Average farm cash income is projected to fall from $76,000 in 2008-09 to $62,000 in 2009-10, mainly because of lower grain and beef cattle prices. Reduced farm cash incomes are expected for broadacre farms in New South Wales and Queensland because of reduced crop production and lower grain and beef cattle prices.”

Mr Bowen said it was a different situation in Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania where farm cash incomes are projected to rise because of increases in winter crop production in 2009 and higher prices for wool, sheep and lambs.

“Average farm cash income for dairy farms is projected to decline from $88,000 in 2008-09 to $50,000 in 2009-10, mainly because of lower manufacturing milk prices,” he said.

“Overall, broadacre and dairy farms had strong farm equity at 30 June 2009 and new farm investment has been strong in the past two years. Many farms, therefore, appear to have the financial capacity to take advantage of the improved seasonal conditions in much of eastern and northern Australia so far in 2010”.

Tony Eyres, executive director of Harvest Capital Partners, told delegates of the increasing interest in investment in agricultural production and farm land from institutional and strategic investors.

“Australia has a real comparative advantage as a destination for investing in agriculture because of a well established agricultural production history, efficient production of globally-traded agricultural commodities, strong export orientation, stable government, transparent markets and significantly proximately to key growth markets in Asia,” Mr Eyres said.

Mr Eyres added that the main impediment to corporate investment was lack of investment grade opportunities that offer the management capability, size and scale required by larger investors.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I want to know more about the BAN and less about farming forecasts!!
Posted by andrew, 3/03/2010 8:17:57 AM
What have been the big messages from Outlook that have interested you in your role as economics and trade manager at NFF?
Posted by FarmOnline, 3/03/2010 9:47:49 AM
Thanks Farmonline for your opening question and thanks for having me here today.

In response to your question, from my perspective, I am most interested in the key drivers of commodity prices received by farmers and the forecast of where these drivers are heading.

Clearly, when we are talking about a sector that exports two thirds of everything it produces and is highly exposed to international markets, exchange rates are a key factor. All the commentary at Outlook suggests that the Australian dollar is likely to remain relatively strong and this clearly poses challanges for farmers.

Linked to exchange rates is the issue of interest rates and the commentary from Outlook is that there are likely to be further increases (even on top of yesterday's increase) to the offical cash rate.

Again, this poses real challenges for farmers to service their increasing farm debt levels.

On the positive side however, it has been pleasing to hear ABARE's projections of global economic recovery, particularly in the Asian region - vital export markets for our farm produce.

Posted by Charles McElhone on 3/03/2010 9:59:54 AM
A lot of the forecasts point to significant competition in key export markets. How do we deal with that?
Posted by FarmOnline, 3/03/2010 10:02:29 AM
Australian farmers have never shied away from competition and I have no doubt that we will be difficult to displace in all markets due to the fact that we are extremely efficient at producing the demands of our domestic and global customers.

The problem emerges when we are forced to deal on an uneven playing field against highly subsidised product and other discriminatory and protectionist trade policies. E.g. Dairy export subsidies from the US and the EU.

This is why the trade liberalisation agenda is so important for Australia's farmers to ensure that we dismantle these obstacles. This process is happening far too slowly but we cannot let our feet off the pedal.


Posted by Charles McElhone on 3/03/2010 10:13:03 AM
Thanks for your input Charlie - most helpful indeed. On a lighter note, how do you think the Wallabies will fair this season leading into next year's World CUp in NZ?
Posted by Robbie D, 3/03/2010 10:05:41 AM
I forecast the Wallabies to win the next World Cup, beating the All Blacks in the final. Scrum issues seem to be resolved but I still have concerns about the inside back combinations.
Posted by Charles McElhone on 3/03/2010 10:17:01 AM
Charles, Is there any concerns, or likely to be, within the rural finance sector regarding the increase in supply (bordering on oversupply) on large rural holding presently being marketed and the risks associated with land depreciation, which we havent seen to date.
Posted by Justjac, 3/03/2010 10:08:36 AM
This is clearly a risk, particularly considering the importance of land values in ensuring positive debt to equity ratios are maintained by Australian farmers. Strong land values have provided good security to lenders in recent years and given them additional confidence in lending to the farm sector. This has been extremely welcome.

While there have been recent sales of large rural land holdings, I believe that the major driver for land prices will continue to be the underlying driver of the prospects of Australian farm production generally - which I believe are extremely positive.

Domestic and global populations increasing, improving diets in developing countries and additional demand for energy based crops. These are just some of the positive underlying fundamentals for agriculture in the medium to long term.

Posted by Charles McElhone on 3/03/2010 10:30:07 AM
Thank you for participating, Charles, and thank you FarmOnline for the forum. Charles, many producers are concerned about the lack of increase in profitability over the last 10-15 years, and are questioning how our levy dollars are being spent. Productivity and profitability must be inextricably linked. Given the Productivity Commission's announced inquiry into RRDCs, what is your suggestion on how to improve use of our levy dollars to get the most "bang for our buck?" Thanks again!
Posted by WA Aggie, 3/03/2010 10:30:24 AM
This has indeed been a big issue at Outlook and for the NFF. The concerning decrease in productivity gains being experienced by Australian farmers in recent years and the importance of R&D in correcting the downward trend.

ABARE has highlighted this week the fact that it is only thanks to the amazing productivity growth rates achieved by Australian farmers that they have been able to keep pace with declining terms of trade. As you say, we are now seeing signs that these gains are failing to keep pace.

NFF has been concerned for some time about the reducing levels of spend on agricultural R&D - research intensity levels are currently at their lowest levels since the early 1970's. We are looking to correct this trend but realise that it is not purely about the quantum of money in R&D but that we also need to ensure that farmers are getting the best bang for their buck.

In this regard, NFF is heavily engaging in the current reviews of agricultural R&D and the RDCs generally. Unfortunately I don't have the specific answers to this issue at this time but can assure you that we are putting a heap of resources to it.

Posted by Charles McElhone on 3/03/2010 10:43:31 AM
What about trade liberalisation on the domestic market. We hear all about free trade for our sales, I am more interested in free trade on the domestic sector, where our cost of business is derived from. For instance, I know of a situation where a city person was dismayed at the high cost of product, and bought off the net, saving about 66% of the Australian cost for the same product, even though it was just the one item that was sent from an overseas country. What agriculture needs, is more of this “FREE and FAIR” trade on our cost side. It appears present policy’s are based around the non agriculture sector being able to charge 3 times the market price for the products that agriculture needs for production I cannot see how this is free, let alone fair trade. I see it as a subsidy to non agriculture, pure and simple
Posted by dunart, 3/03/2010 10:34:20 AM
Unilateral reform is vital as you say. There is more to be done in my opinion to ensuring that farmers costs of production are lowered. This is about domestic support measures that escalate the prices of key farm inputs such as tractors, machinery, financing, fuel and fertiliser and it is also about ensuring that we face a competitive framework for input supplies.

There is no doubt that the agriculture sector has been a leading player in the trade reform agenda since the late 1970's. Other sectors need to catch up.

On a related issue, a recent report by the AFI showed that the cost of essential services for regional Australians was 5 times higher than for those in metro areas. This is also a major cost discrepancy that we need to reverse and NFF is doing some work on this now.

Posted by Charles McElhone on 3/03/2010 10:59:42 AM
Charles, serious work needs to be directed towards the grains industry, following deregulation, particularly with educating growers on market forces and their place in supply chain. There is too much blame and misinformation for this industry to move forward cohesively. In addition, further downstream our potential customers need to be educated on features of Australian grain, we have no one in charge of branding and marketing our product, so taking away all the spin about positive outlooks etc. we are putting ourselves behind the comp from the start due to mismanagement. What can NFF provide??
Posted by Justjac, 3/03/2010 10:44:49 AM
Agreed. Australian agriculture depends on a strong and vibrant grain sector, with strong representation and informed communication about how to get the most out of its supply chain and indeed the optimal policy settings.

It has been extremely disappointing to see the problems that have emerged following the single desk debate that have been so divisive for the sector. The grains industry needs to gather itself and come together as a collective voice that can truly influence decisions of policy, marketing and R&D. Otherwise it can easily be picked off in all of the above areas.

I cannot say what NFF is doing to correct the current situation (as I am not close enough to it) but I know that we are determined to support the process wherever we can.

Posted by Charles McElhone on 3/03/2010 11:12:23 AM
Charlie, what effect will adverse seasonal conditions have on the ability of the Wallabies to handle the ball correctly?
Posted by Enlightened, 3/03/2010 10:58:25 AM
Unfortunately that marks the end of our online forum today. Thankyou everybody for your comments and thankyou to Charles for offering his time to chat with FarmOnline readers.
Posted by Mitchell Vleeskens on 3/03/2010 11:12:59 AM
Charles, you said cost of services was 5 times the urban area cost. Would this also apply to the agriculture costs, as I have seen the factory cost of product, and the Australian port costs, then see what it retails at. That’s why I ask the question, as I know of product that costs $4 to land here, and sells for $100. Easy to get a massive reduction of our costs if we had free and fair trade, for our "buy side". Surely the difference between real world market costs, and domestic regulated costs should not be a problem of a world market income industry sector. This difference is an effective subsidy to the urban sector. For a payment made to agriculture to be called a subsidy, it would have to exceed the difference between world and domestic regulated cost. Only then could it be called a subsidy, and as I see it, the same applies to other countries in the world. In other words, between 60% and 80% of farmers costs are a result of unfair and unfree trade.
Posted by dunart, 3/03/2010 11:20:40 AM
NFF manager for economics and trade Charles McElhone.
NFF manager for economics and trade Charles McElhone.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
02 March, 2010
POLL
Q: What do you think the outlook for your commodity will be this year?

Highly positive
(6.1%)

Positive
(24%)

Neutral
(34.5%)

Negative
(23.3%)

Highly negative
(12.1%)

Total Votes: 429
Poll Date: 28 February, 2010
SPECIAL FEATURES

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...