News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Population growing at twice global average: ABS 

Population growing at twice global average: ABS

26 Mar, 2010 03:46 AM
AUSTRALIA'S population is growing at twice the rate of the rest of the world, after crashing through 22 million late last year.

A demographic report shows the population grew at 2.1 per cent in the year to the end of September, outstripping the Philippines, Malaysia, India, Indonesia and Vietnam. The world population grew 1.1 per cent in the same period.

Economists had expected a slight dip in population growth after the government dropped the number of skilled migrant places in last year's budget - but the lower quotas have had little effect so far.

The population rose by more than the number of people in the Australian Capital Territory in the year to September, increasing by 451,900. And the pace did not slack as the year went on, growing by 110,400 in the three months to September.

Migration accounted for the bulk of the increase.

''Natural'' population growth - births less deaths - came to 154,500 for the year, while migration contributed 297,400 people.

The figures feed into a debate about whether the country has the resources and infrastructure to cope with growing cities.

A former Labor frontbencher, Kelvin Thomson, has regularly voiced his concerns about the environmental impact of a more populous Australia.

He said the Bureau of Statistics figures represented a ''recipe for environmental devastation, rising interest rates, and unaffordable housing''.

''This is the reason for the 22 per cent decline in housing affordability we saw during 2009 - rising house prices fuelled by demand outstripping supply,'' Mr Thomson said.

The Macquarie Group economist Rory Robertson said the people coming to Australia in recent years had mostly settled in coastal capitals. ''Obviously there has been a big deal for housing demand and city infrastructure needs.''

But Mr Robertson added: ''Immigration may have peaked for the next few years at least, given that Canberra now is taking a tougher line on foreign students becoming permanent residents, and with the surge in Australians rushing home to escape offshore recessions having peaked.''

The Treasurer, Wayne Swan, will today press state treasurers to agree on timelines to lock in the supply of new housing.

At a meeting in Canberra, the treasurers will be under pressure to agree on audits to look at ''underutilised'' land, and to examine large private holdings of land that could be used to increase the housing stock.

The opposition spokesman on housing, Gary Humphries, questioned whether the meeting would achieve anything.

''These Labor governments have been pursuing this approach for a decade, and Labor has been in power nationally for more than two years, so what's Mr Swan doing about this problem?''

NSW grew by 1.7 per cent, behind Western Australia at 2.9 per cent, Queensland at 2.7 per cent, the Northern Territory at 2.3 per cent and Victoria at 2.2 per cent.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Social engineering gone evil!
Posted by tigerdicky, 26/03/2010 5:37:45 AM
The post-war immigration boom made Australia what it is today. I don't think very many modern Australians would feel comfortable pre-World War II Australian society. In another two generations the same thing will probably apply in regard to our current society. There will be good and bad, but it will be mostly good. People don't uproot their entire lives and move to another country and culture to then sit on their butts and do nothing. Our pioneering ancestors that we all revere, where immigrants. So it should be remembered that these new immigrants share the same characteristics as them.
Posted by Qlander, 26/03/2010 6:01:30 AM
Qldlander, But were they queue jumping economic refugees!
Posted by tigerdicky, 26/03/2010 8:51:43 AM
Right on, Qlander. I argue we (Australian citizens) should have a sensible, intelligent and non-emotional debate over the next few years on what we think about population growth projections for Australia for the next half a dozen decades. We do and should have a right to input to this very important issue, and we should dispassionately look at and review all the realistic options. However, it is, I think, essential that we are hard-headed about exactly what our options are. One option canvassed from time to time on fol is to keep Australia's population as it is now, or even reduce it. This is NOT a REALISTIC option, given our current population distribution, and the fact that the world population is predicted to increase by two billionor so in coming decades. Let us have a debate, but let us make sure it is not hijacked by the racists, the emotionally crippled and the good old basic conservatives and environmentalists who are incapable of ruling out impossible und unobtainable objectives. We have seen some of the outpouring of these emotionally and intellectually challenged ratbags on fol in recent weeks.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 26/03/2010 10:03:01 AM
The population equation is simple. Too many in cities, not enough in regional areas. There's no reason to suggest we should lower our population - we just need to direct the majority of it into the underpopulated areas.
Posted by Enlightened, 26/03/2010 10:27:57 AM
The goverment is paying Aussies to breed up- we should go out and populate the place!
Posted by tigerdicky, 26/03/2010 12:27:06 PM
That is the easy part sorted, Enlightened. The hard part is to create an environment where people want to go, because there are all the services available (work, education, health, medical, sporting, cultural, entertainment etc etc). We must offer an attractive and sustainable environment. There is no way we can demand people live in a particular location for other than a very small period of time. All of these factors form part of a productive debate on our future population, and its impact on Australia.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 26/03/2010 2:12:51 PM
Only our urban people heaps have unmanaged, runaway population growth. Regional Australia’s population, west of the ranges in NSW in particular is actually crashing?
Posted by The people plague, 26/03/2010 6:51:18 PM
tigerdicky; There weren't any queues back then, but yes pretty much all of them would have been economic and, or political refugees. Plus a fair few criminals, but with a new country and a new life, most of them never looked back. If you ask me the sort of people who are prepared to risk everything. In a small leaky boat on the open sea just to get here. Are type type people this country needs to secure its future. If the country is getting full, perhaps we can kick out some of those useless whingeing bastards. Sitting around their arse's complaining about the price of beer and cigarettes.
Posted by Qlander, 27/03/2010 11:37:23 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
24 March, 2010
POLL
Q: Should any of the three AWI directors criticised by Italian manufacturers earlier in the month resign?

Yes - all three
(64.6%)

Yes - but only Olssen and Sheil
(2.7%)

Yes - but only Modiano and Olssen
(0.4%)

Yes - but only Modiano and Sheil
(0%)

Yes - but only Olssen
(1.9%)

Yes - but only Sheil
(0.8%)

Yes - but only Modiano
(0.8%)

No
(29%)

Total Votes: 525
Poll Date: 21 March, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...