News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Rudd dismisses property rights protest 

Rudd dismisses property rights protest

02 Feb, 2010 03:38 PM
MORE than 2000 people have arrived at Magna Carta Place in Canberra for today's property rights protest by farmers, but already this morning Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has dismissed the issue, saying their problems have nothing to do with Federal policies.

In a press conference this morning Mr Rudd said that both he and Agriculture Minister Tony Burke were "scratching their heads" trying to think of any climate change policy the Government was responsible for which had robbed farmers of their rights.

He said native vegetation laws, which have curbed farmers' use of their land, were a state responsibility.

However, farmers say the Commonwealth has admitted to being party to those land clearing bans, and has since claimed the carbon credits from the locked up timber in order to meet commitments made under the Kyoto Protocol.

Landholders say they have not been compensated for the loss of their right to use their timber and soil, or for the carbon credits.

Today's rally has also been told of plans to target state governments as part of an on-going protest, with NSW farmers planning a similar rally in Sydney on February 24.

The issue was brought to public attention recently when ACT grazier Peter Spencer went on a hunger strike for 52 days to bring attention to the issue.

Mr Spencer is one of several speakers who will address today's rally.

Thousands of farmers and landholders from across the country are arriving in Canberra for the protest.

* Click here for a full list of all the stories, photos, and multimedia reports from Tuesday's protest.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Much ado about nothing.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 2/02/2010 8:29:50 AM
We are Aussies, we are farmers, we will never be defeated!
Posted by tigerdicky, 2/02/2010 9:13:58 AM
SHAME! SHAME! SHAME! Rudd and co. You know as well as we do, that the Federal Government - admittedly under the Liberal Government, but still the Federal Government - directed the tree clearing bans through the state governments because the state governments cannot be sued for compensation, but the Federal Government can. I can only speak for Queensland, but I know many farmers who own land they cannot use because of these bans, but still have to pay rates etc on that land. They cannot sell it - who will buy a block of land that can't be used. Some have sections of land they cannot use but cannot cut off to sell, and these measures reduce the farmers assets. The farmers bought this land and it has been stolen from them by state governments with the blessing of the federal government, who claim the Kyoto credits. Don't pretend you don't know. It is even more detrimental to your case. Farmers deserve compensation.
Posted by Concerned Northerner, 3/02/2010 4:24:10 AM
Mr Rudd, This is how it works. 1) The Federal Government signs an International treaty - 1992. 2) Through COAG the international treaty is empowered with payment to the States - 1992. 3) The States enact the laws and statutes to remove the landowners rights - 1994-1995. 4) The States do not pay relevant compensation to those landowners affected, because they keep the money for other purposes. I'm sorry that you missed the facts in your statement.
Posted by John Michelmore, 3/02/2010 5:41:55 AM
This is a disgraceful statement from a Prime Minister that has an anti-rural agenda. He cannot be trusted to do anything as his voter support base is not in the rural sector. He has been proven to tell untruths on a regular basis. The sooner this country removes this person and his party the better.
Posted by Retired farmer, 3/02/2010 6:09:35 AM
Bushie, after an Army Parade a very proud mother stepped up to the RSM in charge of the parade and proudly stated, "RSM I am so proud as my son was the only one in step." Bushie your mother must be so proud of you! Krudd and crew use your tactics of "if you can not win a debate on evidence try to belittle the opposition".
Posted by Fred, 3/02/2010 6:11:03 AM
Man's home is his castle Kevin, you should know, you occupy three. And I bet there's no tree problems at the Lodge or Kirrribilli House? And you wan't to stop sratching your head for solutions mate, you'll be in hospital next, having major surgery to remove mass splinters from your fingers! And when you're addressing the media, try using mentioned Ministers by their correct name, as not every one knows your pet knick names for your mates in parliament!
Posted by Annie of the Rail, 3/02/2010 6:15:01 AM
True tigerdickey. KRudd had better believe that this issue is not going away.
Posted by R, 3/02/2010 6:26:58 AM
Not a mention of this in the mainstream media - pity reading the Rural Press is not compulsary in y11 and y12.
Posted by the Lorax, 3/02/2010 6:28:00 AM
The Lorax it did make mainstream media. A number of TV News programs including A Current Affair which had a Reporter there had good reports. Shame you missed them?
Posted by Fred, 3/02/2010 7:02:55 AM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
02 February, 2010
POLL
Q: What level of trust do you have in the claims made by environmental campaigners?

Total
(5%)

High
(12.7%)

Moderate
(6.2%)

Low
(21.3%)

None
(54.8%)

Total Votes: 1310
Poll Date: 31 January, 2010

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...