News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Rudd rejects Cobb's drought-aid plea 

Rudd rejects Cobb's drought-aid plea

30 Sep, 2009 11:51 AM
A plea from Nationals agriculture spokesman John Cobb for a personal intervention by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd to aid drought-stricken rural communities has fallen on deaf ears.

Mr Cobb this week wrote to Prime Minister Kevin Rudd calling for "personal intervention" to ensure the "mental, social and economic well-being of regional communities in Australia".

But a spokesman for the Prime Minister argues existing government assistance and plans to reforms drought assistance "will see less farmers reach crisis point" .

The spokesman would not comment on whether Mr Rudd would accept the offer to visit the affected regions.

Mr Cobb's letter is based on fears of severe crop losses in Australia's eastern states and dire water allocations in many parts of the Murray-Darling Basin, and he wrote of his concerns for the mental health of his own constituents in central west NSW.

"It is with a great deal of regret that I write to you to inform you that we are facing another winter crop disaster in much of Central, Southern and Western NSW, with parts of Queensland and Victoria also facing severe crop losses," Mr Cobb's letter says.

Mr Cobb said there was a real and urgent need is for immediate support from the Government, particularly for regions which have been taken out of exceptional circumstances prematurely.

However, a spokesman for the Prime Minister said the Government continues to provide a range of services to help ease the pressure of the prolonged drought on families and communities.

"This year the Government has allocated about $900 million for Exceptional Circumstances support including support with household living expenses and interest rate subsidies to help farmers pay their loans," Mr Rudd's spokesman said.

"We have maintained the same system of providing support used by the previous government, including reappointing the same members of the National Rural Advisory Council (NRAC) which provides independent advice on Exceptional Circumstances drought declarations.

"There is no doubt that southern and western NSW have experienced prolonged drought, and eligible farmers in those areas have access to Exceptional Circumstances support for their families and their businesses."

The spokesman said the Government has made it clear that it will continue to provide EC support to farmers who are currently in drought, but it is also working on a future drought policy which would deliver better outcomes to farmers "by removing the system of lines on maps".

"We don’t want to wait until people are in crisis to step in and help," the spokesman said.

"We want a new policy which helps farmers when times are good and encourages them to adjust to the challenges of the future, including climate change.

"This will see less farmers reach crisis point."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
70 million dollars to Toyota to build an electric car that Toyota were going to build anyway, 40 million dollars to the victims of an Italian earthquake, millions of dollars a week to give illegal immigrants pleasant accommodation on Christmas Island while scrapping the means of re-couping the cost, millions of dollars given to developing countries to help them to increase their agricultural productivity, our assets thrown open to foreign ownership, susidized agricultural imports flooding over our wharfs, the longest running drought in recorded history, and KRudd thinks everything is OK and we shouldn't look after our own. I bet it would be different if the car manufacturers were going to the wall. And every one of them foreign owned.
Posted by Brindi, 30/09/2009 6:07:46 PM
Did we ever expect any thing different? It's well known that the Labor party will do nothing to help the bush while helping every other minority group here and overseas.

This is pure politics: the bush does not vote for them so they will get no help. Droughts or floods here get no action yet a disaster happens overseas and the dollars shoot offshore, buying support from other countries.

Heaven forbid that KRudd and his mates meet real battlers and see and hear their problems. In his mind and those of his advisors they are probably the people who caused the drought in the first place.

Posted by Mrs Mac, 1/10/2009 4:45:05 AM
I bet it would be different if krudd were actually in Australia once in a while.The only travel he seems interested in is overseas, flying home once in a while to get fresh clothes and fill the wallet again.
Posted by bill, 1/10/2009 5:14:42 AM
Re John Cobb's letter, I agree with Mrs Mac and Brindi. This is pure politics. One does notice that the "spokesman" for the PM does not say that it is a bipartisan approach that will be used to make the drought relief situation for farmers/family/wives any better.

In my opinion, the whole situation should be reviewed with the NFF and wives/partners/CWA - and keep politics out of it. Failure to rectify the situation will lead to prices that the population will not be able to afford and imports will only aggravate the situation and a hungry nation can turn ugly.

Posted by Phil, 1/10/2009 6:21:51 AM
Yes, KR doesn't care for farmers much and has stuffed up what the last government worked hard to fix. I think he is a little kid with his big new toy and now I think he will be out next election.
Posted by beeman, 1/10/2009 7:02:25 AM
It is Kevin Rudd's big agenda to get himself a seat on the UN at Australia's cost - that's why they throw money at everybody else and make Australians suffer.

It appears that he doesn't care for his own country and when he speaks he will not give a straight yes or no, which is what people want to hear - not meaningless talk

Posted by petro, 1/10/2009 8:01:12 AM
One that, in the end, lost his/her head, once said: "If they don't have bread, let them eat cake!" Well methinks that Krudd and Co will eat something more unpalatable at the next election!!

Bring on the double dissolution (disillusion?)

Posted by Peter, 1/10/2009 10:33:06 AM
An earthquake, severe flood or fire - big news. A long-term drought - who cares? We aren't worried about it anymore. That sadly is what I feel people in urban or mining communities now think.

This drought has taken so much out of people. Keep in mind that farmers and agriculture businesses are working harder now than ever (partners included) to live and to try and pay a debt. For their troubles, every year they owe more and have less.

As for the mines, the politicans bend over backwards for them. What happens when there is a finciancial crisis? The government bends over to help and then gives them all our water. And the mines which have made so much money repay these communities by sacking their staff (these miners then go to another mine).

The poor farmer stays on - feast, flood or famine. As did his or her fathers before them and their children to follow. They are the backbone of a true society but they all live over a big hill to far away for people to care - until there is a natural distaster in Sydney and then we are the first to help.

Well, you'd better start helping the bush or there won't be anyone left out here.

Posted by tom, 1/10/2009 10:57:58 AM
"It is Kevin Rudd's big agenda to get himself a seat on the UN at Australia's cost." At least if the above is true, you will not have to worry about him hanging around after his use by date, like the previous PM.
Posted by fehowarth, 1/10/2009 1:25:14 PM
Why didn't his Liberal masters do something about it when they were in power - because they didn't care!
Posted by tigerdicky, 1/10/2009 1:35:47 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
29 September, 2009
28 September, 2009
POLL
Q: Should politicians who retire mid-term be fined to help recover the costs of holding a by-election?

Yes
(73.4%)

No
(22%)

Undecided
(4.7%)

Total Votes: 473
Poll Date: 27 September, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...