News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Stern says go vegetarian to save planet 

Stern says go vegetarian to save planet

29 Oct, 2009 07:52 AM
LORD Nicholas Stern, author of an influential 2006 report on the economics of climate change for the United Kingdom, has advocated vegetarianism as a way of tackling climate change.

"Meat is a wasteful use of water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases,” The Times of London reported Lord Stern as saying

“It puts enormous pressure on the world's resources. A vegetarian diet is better."

The author of the Stern Review, who is not a strict vegetarian himself, believes that the economics of tackling climate change will mean meat prices will rise substantially, forcing people to evolve toward a more vegetarian diet.

The United Nations attributes 18 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions to meat production, including forest destruction for ranching and production of animal feeds.

Predictably, UK vegetarians have welcomed Lord Stern’s comments, and UK farmers have in turn been angered.

Lord Stern is a former chief economist of the World Bank and now the I G Patel Professor of Economics at the London School of Economics, The Times reported.

The CSIRO Home Energy Saving Handbook, released last month, has also endorsed vegetarian diets as having a low greenhouse footprint—although an earlier publication, the CSIRO Total Wellbeing Diet, advocated plenty of animal protein.

A 2006 study by the University of Chicago concluded that compared to the Standard American Diet, a strict vegetarian diet produced 1485 kg less carbon dioxide per person per year.

However, Cornell University research found that a purely vegetarian diet may not be the most efficient use of land.

A low-fat vegetarian diet involved the lowest “land footprint” in the Cornell study, but the diet with the most efficient land footprint—and thus able to feed the most people—contained meat and dairy.

While vegetarianism must be supported by high-value land, animals can utilise rougher pasture lands, the researchers observed, so that more people could be fed from the study area (New York State) from mixed farming than if a purely vegetarian diet was grown.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
You have to be kidding? Just publishing this rubbish is enough to put anyone off their vegies! You can just see the animal activist geeks jumping up and down with glee that the press has printed this junk. Does this mean that all the animals will have to be eaten first ? Or will they just let them free to breed and fart? Cant have it both ways I think.
Posted by mick, 29/10/2009 7:21:03 AM
Such a wonderful piece of enviro-religious reasoning as Stern's must surely be worth a Nobel Prize. I mean, if we all take to living like rabbits then maybe the bunny cull-bug will cross the great divide thus solving both the carbon footprint problem and the poverty problem.

How interesting to note that Sterny is now holed up at the London School of Economics (LSE) founded by George Bernard Shaw who was also the brainfather of collectivism, whereby the rich and powerful share the spoils of modern usury and the poor .....?

Well, the LSE founder's proposed method for eliminating poverty was to eliminate the poor!

Posted by jock, 29/10/2009 8:23:34 AM
It certainly highlights the mentality of those pushing the carbon tax agenda!!!
Posted by jerangle, 29/10/2009 8:49:50 AM
Why is it every statement by this guy is broadcast with such ferverish excitment by the press. Stern is no messiah so why treat everything he says as gospel (pardon the pun).

This dross first came out in the Times two days ago, as the front page item. While I completely disagree with his statements and overall misinformation on this topic, I recall the vegan website breathlessly screeching a kg of beef took 15,000 lts of water to produce, without any justification or explanation.

The farming lobby needs to do a far better job of getting its message across. Otherwise all the ill-informed general public gets is a very one-sided, dire-sounding, inaccurate story.

Posted by SJRW, 29/10/2009 9:48:20 AM
Why don't we have a cardboard diet? How stupid.
Posted by shaun, 29/10/2009 10:25:47 AM
The Stern report has been discredited by real scientists around the world so why does Rural Press choose to give this nonsense oxygen? Could it be that it is in Kevin Rudd's pocket? How about a bit of objective reporting. You could start by giving Mike Cawood an extended holiday - I've yet to see anything of balance with his name under it.
Posted by Bob, 29/10/2009 11:05:50 AM
SJRW, the CSIRO Land & Water division reports that it takes between 50,000 and 100,000 litres of water to produce 1kg of beef, depending on type of production (extensive non-irrigated pasture to grain-fed feedlot systems). The vegan website you refer to was actually being very conservative.

To ensure an accurate picture, the water for food figures are, and should always be, based on the total food production cycle from paddock to plate, not just the amount of water an animal may drink. Think about it and research a tad more broadly perhaps.

Posted by Harmless, 29/10/2009 11:32:45 AM
Gee, more diatribe Yet the quiet sun and cooling world is ignored. It says a lot!

See: www.twawki.wordpress.com

Posted by Paul, 29/10/2009 1:05:40 PM
The environmental arguments for vegetarianism are plentiful and based on factual information relating to the resource use and pollution.

Throw in the regular warnings against red meat/high animal product consumption, based on peer reviewed health studies ie. heart disease, diabetes, colorectal and breast cancer, obesity, and that is the reason this topic will only continue to gain attention and momentum.

The so-called CSIRO Total Wellbeing Diet project, one suspects, might have been driven by their mission to support Australian industry (MLA & Diary Australia part funded the research) and for revenue.

The CSIRO relies very heavily on industry funding as govt funding has been severely cut over the years. They knew how lucrative the weight loss & diet market is - there are millions of people out there who bought their book. Read the book CSIRO Perfidy http://www.perfidy.com.au/

Posted by Harmless, 29/10/2009 3:06:04 PM
Did I read breeding ewes to $200 per head? Consumers are voting with there wallets and there resolve for meat is strengthening.

Consumers will not be told what and how to eat. They will eat what they enjoy. If they enjoy meat, great and if they enjoy a vegetarian diet, great ,or any other combination great. Neither is right or wrong, it's what tastes right to the indiviual and that's what should be respected.

I respect vegetarians right and I also expect the same coutesy back because I enjoy a meat related diet. Trying to take a moral stance does not change my taste buds.

Best go and turn my lamb chops and finish my well earned beer. Cheers

Posted by Nick, 29/10/2009 5:47:30 PM
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Lord Stern says: Meat is a wasteful use of water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases. It puts enormous pressure on the world's resources. A vegetarian diet is better.
Lord Stern says: "Meat is a wasteful use of water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases. It puts enormous pressure on the world's resources. A vegetarian diet is better."
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
28 October, 2009
26 October, 2009
27 October, 2009
POLL
Q: For what level of cattle transaction levy will you be voting at this year's Meat and Livestock Australia annual general meeting?

$3.50
(64.9%)

$5
(35.1%)

Total Votes: 276
Poll Date: 25 October, 2009

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...