News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 The naked truth about our landscape 

The naked truth about our landscape

29 Sep, 2009 12:22 PM
Australia has been stripped bare of vegetation to expose the surface that lies beneath.

Scientists from CSIRO’s Water for a Healthy Country Flagship have removed approximately 90 per cent of Australia’s vegetation cover from satellite images of the continent to produce the most detailed available Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of its topography.

"The DEM will revolutionise geological applications, land-use studies, soil science, and much more," CSIRO’s Dr John Gallant said in an address today to the Spatial Sciences Conference in Adelaide.

"Produced at a one-second resolution – about 30 metres – the DEM exposes intimate details about Australia’s landscape features.

"As a result, we can now clearly make out the shape of our landscape and understand how water might move across its surface, how it came to be its present shape and how variable our soil terrains are."

Since releasing the Digital Surface Model (DSM) last year, the new vegetation removal process has also resulted in a spin-off vegetation height map that may be useful for calculating biomass and contributing to carbon accounting.

The DEM will provide a body of information related to water resources and is a key activity within the water information research and development alliance between the Flagship and the Bureau of Meteorology’s Improving Water Information Program.

The final phase of building the one-second resolution DEM will occur over the next year with the inclusion of Australia’s river network to produce a drainage-enforced DEM that will assist the Bureau to generate water accounts for the continent.

The DEM is based on the Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) satellite data collected by NASA during its Space Shuttle mission in 2000.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
With all vegetation in tact the land fed 400,000 for thousands of years. How well fed is another thing, but never mind that as Dr Gallant sits in the suburbs with not much to do but feed off the work of the pioneers. Just goes to show in a society of plenty you always end up with drones who feed off the efforts of others and criticise. Starting to think these city dudes dream about what is out there. There, been, out in the country.
Posted by kevin dudd, 29/09/2009 3:11:08 PM
This may be true for arid and semi-arid Australia but in the Wet Tropics at least 77% of the area is conserved in some way and that doesn't include bits of regrowth and riparian areas along creeks and rivers on private land.
Posted by Northerner, 30/09/2009 5:28:15 AM
Kevin Dudd... um... what did Dr Gallant critricise here? Methinks thou dost protest too much. Or perhaps you only read the headline.
Posted by GT, 30/09/2009 5:59:51 AM
I think the first line was a very unfortunate bit of sub-editing which, in the context of two decades of farmer demonisation, was neither clever, informative, nor helpful to readers.
Posted by Ian Mott, 30/09/2009 8:09:32 AM
Well, the headline got me in. Interesting.
Posted by Ted O'Brien, 30/09/2009 8:42:34 AM
Could any body see the differences in the photos displayed here? For, both looked alike to me. What wasteful money spending!
Posted by downtoearth, 30/09/2009 9:00:41 AM
OK, so you want a better explanation? Basically the Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) is a dataset captured from satellites circulating the earth that can be used to produce topography maps (yes those contour lines on your shire or hiking maps) and other geographical analysis such as placement of mobile phone towers and water accumulation/movement. Since it is collected from satellites, vegetation (and buildings for that matter) disfigure the true landscape. Look closely at the picture - you can see vegetation lines in the first, but not the second. What CSIRO have done is removed the topography disfigurement from the data to give a true representation of the landscape. It is necessary for maps and data analysis mentioned above. Hope this helps.
Posted by Ben, 30/09/2009 9:24:22 AM
I can't see a difference in the photos. Does this mean that there are no changes? Then how is it that Australia has been stripped bare?
Posted by Lindam, 30/09/2009 11:02:15 AM
Stripped bare - what rubbish. Please save producers of food from people like this as they are slowly but surely making certain Australia will suffer food shortages in the future.
Posted by Concerned Northerner, 1/10/2009 3:14:43 AM
Do we have any dates on the images? This reminds me of Al Gore's summer and winter photos of the southern tip of South America which proved global warming is a seasonal phenomena!

Yes, we can expect our land to be browner at the moment - I see this out my car window and a lot more roos and feral goats then I used to see years ago as well! They do not get sent to saleyards to reduce stocking rates when dry seasons hit.

We need better land management controls over National Parks and the indigenous and feral grazing animals they breed up - not farmers who try to protect their land from these water, pasture and crop robbers.

It would be interesting to analyse images of private property adjoining national parks to see the impact of this extra grazing pressure and compare these to those further removed from these pest harbours.

Though woody weeds and scrub can hide the naked truth viewed at ground level truth from such aerial surveys.

Posted by Common Cents, 1/10/2009 9:45:30 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Satellite images near Culcairn in NSW showing the topography with vegetation (left) and without vegetation (right). Image: CSIRO
Satellite images near Culcairn in NSW showing the topography with vegetation (left) and without vegetation (right). Image: CSIRO
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
28 September, 2009
POLL
Q: Should politicians who retire mid-term be fined to help recover the costs of holding a by-election?

Yes
(73.4%)

No
(22%)

Undecided
(4.7%)

Total Votes: 473
Poll Date: 27 September, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...