News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Vic, NSW Labor back farmers' carbon claims 

Vic, NSW Labor back farmers' carbon claims

10 Sep, 2009 06:35 PM
THE Victorian and NSW governments have inflicted an embarrassing blow to the commonwealth government's policy on agricultural greenhouse gas emissions, by backing research that supports the federal opposition's campaign to allow farmers to claim and trade carbon credits.

The report commissioned by the two state governments, and obtained by The Australian Financial Review, argues that farmers should have access to a voluntary carbon trading system whilst not being formally covered under the federal government's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme.

"Agriculture offers substantial opportunities to lower the costs of meeting Australia's [greenhouse gas] policy and international engagement objectives," the report says.

A voluntary system, the ACIL Tasman report argues, could allow farmers to generate credits from reducing emissions, which they could then sell through a process similar to the Chicago Climate Exchange in the United States.

"It's inexplicable that the government continues to exclude green carbon offsets or soil carbon offsets from its model. It's time to set up a voluntary scheme now," environment spokesman Greg Hunt said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Excuse me. Australian agriculture has already made substantial sacrifices to lower national CO2 emissions. That sacrifice was broadscale, indiscriminant clearing bans and to date there has not been one cent paid in compensation for lost opportunity, let alone for the millions of dollars each year in reduced CO2 emissions.

And surprise, surprise, two of the worst governments have teamed up with the Liberal Party day-trippers, and assorted stock and station agents on the make, to try and flog even more carbon scams.

Make good on the $1billion a year that is already owed to farmers and someone might take you seriously.

Posted by Ian Mott, 11/09/2009 8:13:14 AM
Surely Fairfax Media can do better than this? What an embarrassing blow. I didn't know that the federal government had a carbon policy for agriculture other than to defer its inclusion in the planned ETS until 2015.

This report is a valuable contribution to the dialogue between the industry and government and those that commissioned it deserve thanks for adding real value.

Posted by Mike Cahill, 11/09/2009 8:53:14 AM
Greg Hunt originally worked for the UN before his election. He backs the UN's position of alarminism. He appears to push the dodgy science about global warming and the demonisation of the plant food CO2. Hopefully, we will hear some sense from Stephen Fielding on this matter.
Posted by Len, 11/09/2009 9:27:54 AM
I am at a loss to understand why Ian and Len have both written negative and doubtful comments on what, at least on the surface, appears to be a step in the right direction to give agriculture half a chance to be involved on the positive side.

I can understand Ian's cynicism as far as recompense for compensation thus far, but we have to keep moving forward. I think this is at least half a step in the right direction. What say you?

Posted by don w, 13/09/2009 4:57:32 PM
Didn't Howard include rural Aus carbon mitigation capablity in his package to comply with the Kyoto demands? If that's the case, all farmers' carbon credits has been claimed by the federal government.

If farmers are allowed to trade our carbon credits, that means the feds cant use those same credits, which means the urban areas will have to make serious cuts in emissions.

This would need to be legislated and would entail urban dwellers to make drastic changes to their lifestyles!

Posted by bill, 15/09/2009 9:38:58 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
10 September, 2009
POLL
Q: Is it worth paying higher prices for 'free range' produce?

Yes
(39.9%)

No
(55.9%)

Undecided
(4.2%)

Total Votes: 589
Poll Date: 06 September, 2009
BLOGS
09 September, 2009

Most popular articles


Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...