News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Vic pipeline cleared to take four times what Toorale ... 

Vic pipeline cleared to take four times what Toorale saved

12/09/2008 3:22:00 PM
On Wednesday the Federal Government spent $24 million to buy Toorale Station for its 20 gigalitre water entitlement.

Today it told the Victorian Government they could go ahead and take nearly four times that volume out of the same Murray Darling river system every year to shore up Melbourne's water supply – providing they saved it first.

Federal Environment minister Peter Garrett gave conditional approval for the controversial Sugarloaf Pipeline, which is intended to carry 75GL a year water saved by modernising the Goulburn Murray irrigation district from the Goulburn River to Melbourne, in return for $900m state Government funding for the project.

The project had been referred to him under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Act and was being assessed for impact on flora and fauna only.

Mr Garrett rejected applications made by Plug the Pipe to broaden the scope of the referral to take in the impact of taking water from the Goulburn on the Murray Darling Basin and Ramsar-listed wetlands.

However, he has made it a condition of his approval that all savings to be taken for the pipeline will have to be audited and available before they are delivered.

He also flagged a possible EPBC referral of the Food Bowl project itself, saying savings could only be taken following the assessment of their potential impact on matters of national environmental significance.

A spokesman said this did not imply the Minister was making a referral a condition, nor would any referral necessarily involve looking at the impact of taking water out of the Murray Darling system.

"He is not saying it has to be assessed, but that it may need to be assessed," he said.

"The criteria for any referral have not been set."

Mr Garrett appears to have also vetoed the Victorian Government’s plans to raid the Living Murray and Water for Rivers projects to ensure 75GL flows down the pipe in 2010/11 before full savings from modernization are realized.

A condition of approval is that "no water come from the Living Murray initiative or the Water for Rivers entitlements".

The Government had said it would use 75GL saved under the two schemes through the Shepparton Modernisation Project and modernization of the Central Goulburn channels 1,2,3, & 4 to send down the pipe in 2010/11 if it had not achieved sufficient savings.

Mr Garrett's office was today still clarifying if the condition applied to those savings the State Government had earmarked for the first year of the pipe, or was intended as a prohibition on raiding environmental water down the track.

Mr Garrett said in making his decision he had carefully considered the environmental impacts of the project proposed by the Victorian Government on matters protected by the EPBC Act.

"Based on the information and advice I have received, I am confident that this pipeline can be built without adversely affecting nationally listed threatened species," he said.

"Securing water supply for our urban populations is of fundamental importance. The Victorian Government put this proposal forward on the basis that the water would be sourced primarily from savings from the Foodbowl Modernisation Project which will also go to irrigators and importantly, the environment.

"I have made it a condition of my approval that all savings to be taken for the pipeline could only be taken following the assessment of their potential impact on matters of national environmental significance. These savings must be audited and available before they can be sent down the pipeline.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Do Governments think they can have everything both ways??? Federal Government spends money to save water, and the Victorian Government wants to Spend Money to take Water. Doesn't matter what side you're on, Garrett was only interested in looking at the Plants and Animals that may have been affected - he did not even want to look at the MDB.
Posted by Do not blame me, I did'nt vote Labor on 12/09/2008 4:31:55 PM
The hypocrisy of Governments is appalling. Melbourne could get their water from the Otways but they wouldn't want to upset the greenies would they.
Posted by Kevin Rude on 12/09/2008 7:05:37 PM
Alison, The 75GL coming out of the Goulburn River will be real gigalitres every year from a very reliable river. The 20GL at Toorale Station is just an estimate of average allocation of an overland flood event that may or may not flow each year. Just as; “Oils ain’t oils”; “GL ain’t GL”.
Posted by Kev Kelly on 13/09/2008 6:25:58 PM
Losses are very difficult to measure accurately. You can bet that every megalitre of water taken for the city will be measured accurately. There are many electorates of votes in cities compared to a couple of electorates of votes in the Foodbowl. Perhaps the fundamental problem is that the number of consumers far outnumbers the number of producers. What happens in 20 years time when the system runs down again due to insufficient maintenance? You can only sell off the back paddock once. Earl Ricpe 13Sep2008
Posted by Earl Ricpe on 13/09/2008 6:39:09 PM
If the pipeline is bi-directional and excess water from the city dams comes back when available, while not a great deal is better than a one way to the city. Better still move some of the urban population to the water, with some fair dinkum decentralisation !
Posted by Big Bird on 14/09/2008 6:04:13 AM
it is becoming increasingly clear that ther are two levels of importance in this country; the highly influentual metropolis and the less important, ignored and or pushed around regional/rural area. obviously our electoral system is becoming less and less useful for the latter, with concentrated pockets of population having all the representation, rural and regional australia is tending to close down. my simple solution for this is to change the electoral system to an area based system or a grid pattern.
Posted by rod on 14/09/2008 8:07:27 PM
A great reason for an independant non political body to administer the Murray darling system.
Posted by Richard Woolley on 15/09/2008 11:41:57 AM
How could Clyde Ag. turn its back on the local community and the broader farming community? It is very disappointing for them to sell out to the Govt. It shows that money is all they are concerned about. Surely the govt. could have just bought the water licence and then Clyde Ag. sell off the land separately as a going farming concern. It will now become a noose around the local farmers and community's neck with the feral animals & weeds being the only winners. The previous CEO of Clyde and managers of the property must be wondering why they have worked so hard to develop such a valued asset. What a waste !!
Posted by puzzled on 15/09/2008 12:13:56 PM
"Toorale Station" purchase was only a political stunt, the supposed 20Gl or 20,000 Mega litres is a 1-5 year event, it's rare the Warrego reaches the Darling, because many western rivers end in marsh-land. The Greatest Environmental mess in the Murray-Darling Basin is the Lower-Lakes. They each year evaporate 1000 Gl or the equivalent of 50 Toorale Stations. The Lower Lakes are originally Salt Tidal wet-land. The barrages built in 1940 are the prime reason why the Murray mouth is blocked and Coorong dying. A Weir at Wellington SA would save the Murray, protect Adelaide's Water pumps at Mannum, Pipe Irrigation about the Lakes region which now pump direct from the Lakes, the lower Lakes would return to there normal tidal water level and the dolphins would return as before 1940. The Water that evaporated each year in real terms is $400 million. In production or cleaning the environment would be much more. A weir at Wellington SA and Pipe Water May cost even $200 Million. No ones looses. If Climate Change is real with 40% less water in the System, if this year doesn't finish the Lower Lakes maybe next year will. The Murray Darling covers 14% of Australia, and to September 2008 we have recorder the lowest inflows the catchment has recorded.

Cheers Clod-Hopper.

Posted by clod hopper on 21/09/2008 11:15:47 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Environment Minister Peter Garrett.
Environment Minister Peter Garrett.

Q: Do you believe the Rudd Government has a plan for the future development of inland Australia?

Yes
(7.1%)

No
(89.4%)

Undecided
(3.4%)

Total Votes: 757
Poll Date: 14/09/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
FW Subscriptions
 
Nextra Inks
 
Freedom Tanks
 
Irwin HunterIrwin Hunter
 
Rural Bookshop
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...