News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Vic water cap threatens 5000 NSW jobs 

Vic water cap threatens 5000 NSW jobs

20 Mar, 2009 02:47 PM
More than 5000 jobs will be lost in rural NSW if the federal government is forced to concentrate its massive water purchases in NSW, due to restrictions on water trading in Victoria, according to the NSW Irrigators' Council.

The Australian Financial Review reports that the council has calculated that the plan to spend $1.9 billion buying water over the next four years could result in purchases of 791 gigalitres, mostly from NSW.

The council's chief executive, Andrew Gregson, said the caps on trade in Victoria would limit the water that could be bought there to around 25GL, meaning that 766GL would have to be bought from NSW, where caps are not enforced.

"NSW government research shows irrigation employs one person per 270 megalitres," he said.

"A 766 gigalitre purchase therefore removes 2837 jobs from rural NSW.

"Applying even a relatively small multiplier effect of two, to take into account the flow-on effect to local communities, that's 5674 jobs gone."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Here we go again - NSW being ripped off to subsidise the rest of the country. Why don't we just sell off South Australia and be done with it! I am sure that Mr Xenophon would be happy to oblige!
Posted by tigerdicky, 23/03/2009 5:42:08 AM
It's not a state versus state issue, it is the lopsided result. The jobs are going to go, or not come back, wherever the water is removed from, the problem here is the uneven playing field & everyone copping a bit of pain rather than have it concentrated in 1 state. Premier Rees has already looked at introducing the 10% cap into NSW to level things up again. But 5000 jobs is still 5000 jobs, wherever they come from. Thank Kev & Penny for that in the middle of a recession. That does wonders for regional Australia.
Posted by Trev, 23/03/2009 6:38:07 AM
Have a look around you. A lot of the jobs have already gone. The climate is changing, the rain isn't falling. The southern part of the Basin is dry. Penny and Kev are making it easy for farmers to get out of irrigation. If it wasn't for the buyback, a lot of irrigators would just be going broke with no compensation.
Posted by barney, 23/03/2009 7:36:37 AM
The biggest irony in this saga is that Xenophon hijacked the Federal Government's stimulus package to forward his own personal agenda for water reform in South Australia. i.e. he effectively used the stimulus package to remove 1000s of jobs from NSW, the whole time suggesting that he was representing the interests of the entire Murray Darling Basin. Nothing could be further from the truth, he was representing the interests of his own constituents. By pushing this through on the back of an issue that the Government couldn't afford to waste time on he effectively disabled all the discussion that needed to occur before a massive decision like this is taken. Water reform in the MDB is one of the most complex issues in Australia and requires input from all involved with all actions thoroughly considered to ensure the impacts are understood. It is not only the environment that is at stake but the future of regional communities throughout QLD, NSW, Vic and SA. Where is the NSW Government in this debate? If no action is taken soon it may well be too late.
Posted by Rich, 23/03/2009 7:45:32 AM
One job for every 270 megalitres of water? Joking, surely! Please don't tell our workers who irrigate successfully with 1 megalitre per employee.
Posted by heckler from Ourimbah, 23/03/2009 11:41:13 AM
Many jobs have already gone from South Australia. Getting water moving down river will now create jobs. The problem for NSW and Qld is the massive over-allocation of water over the past 20 years. Too bad if they lose some jobs, they ripped off SA for years. Anyway the water is primarily to save the river so that more jobs are not lost.
Posted by Annoyed, 23/03/2009 3:26:28 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
19 March, 2009
20 March, 2009
POLL
Q: If a federal election were held on Saturday, which party would you vote for?

Labor
(16.8%)

Liberal
(40.5%)

Nationals
(25%)

Greens
(8.6%)

Family First
(1.3%)

Independent
(5.9%)

Other
(1.8%)

Total Votes: 1043
Poll Date: 15 March, 2009

Most popular articles


Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...