News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Why depleted soils are making us sick 

Why depleted soils are making us sick

25 Mar, 2009 04:15 PM
When Bathurst doctor Carole Hungerford graduated in the late 1960s, breast cancer was late-life disease diagnosed in about one in fifteen women.

"Now the surgeons are saying it's one in eight, perhaps one in seven," Dr Hungerford said.

"And a lot of it is the young person's cancer, the aggressive one.

"We didn't even look for it 40 years ago."

What's happened? According to the author of Good Health in the 21st Century, we’ve stuffed up.

"Nature didn't stuff up, we stuffed up. Modern humans have been on the planet for 200,000 years, and in the last few decades have we thrown out a lot of challenges to the body," she said.

"We've started putting chlorine in the drinking water, sulfates in the wine, additives in the food … people don't know where they are getting their headache from because they are reacting to everything."

At the same time, Dr Hungerford says, people are getting less nutrient from their food.

"Some of us are eating good food grown in bad soils, or good food that is not fresh. More of us are eating bad food that is neither fresh nor grown in good soils."

Dr Hungerford will be participating in an online question and answer forum on The Land's website between 12 and 2pm Friday.

For many people, the result is an immune system compromised on one hand by lack of resources to do its job, and on the other by a raft of environmental challenges that the human body has never before encountered.

According to Dr Hungerford, a host of modern diseases have their roots in this situation: cancer, arthritis, asthma, autism, Alzheimers, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson’s disease, to name a few.

Teasing out what is behind these diseases, which are swallowing the health budgets of Western nations whole, has been a long obsession for Dr Hungerford.

It culminated in her 2006 book—among other things, a short course in human biochemistry—which swelled the waiting list at her practices in Bathurst and Balmain out to three months and more.

Health is complicated, something that changes from individual to individual, but after years of research and medical practice, Dr Hungerford has come to believe health starts in the soil.

"I think if we were all eating organic foods growing in pristine volcanic soils, and we didn't process that food—so if we ate rice we ate brown rice, and if we ate wheat we ate whole wheat—I think we'd conservatively slash our health budget by 70 per cent," she said.

This may be a logistical impossibility, particularly in Australia and its old, depeleted soils, but Dr Hungerford feels that farming practices, and food processing, need to develop practices that better acknowledge the vital health component of food.

In the meantime, she believes that "most, if not all of us" needs to supplement their diet with key minerals like zinc, selenium, calcium and magnesium.

That's not a common view in the medical profession, which Dr Hungerford believes is one of the reasons that health services everywhere are foundering against a tide of ill-health.

In focusing on "the disease model" and the science of curing disease, Western medicine and related policy has neglected the science of prevention.

"In America, one per cent of the cancer research budget goes into prevention; 99pc goes into other areas—early detection, and looking for the magic bullet. Or it goes into support groups," she said.

"That’s all supported by the medical profession. We cure disease. Where’s the excitement in prevention?

"Even Medicare isn't funded for prevention. If you come and see me and say, 'Look, I feel terrific, and I want to stay that way, can you advise me how to do that?'—that's not covered under Medicare."

In her book, she eloquently argues that prevention of disease begins with soils capable of growing nutrient-dense food; with food supply chains that nuture that nutrient through to consumers; with consumers willing to eat a balanced, healthy diet; and with a general willingness to stop fouling the environment with toxins that are making many of us sick.

"I think it's an idea whose time has come," Dr Hungerford says.

"Once your mother and your sister and your best friend's wife have all got breast cancer, young, you start to think what’s happening—what’s gone wrong?"

In her experience, a lot has gone wrong, and is still doing so.

Signs that this is the case recur every time she does an interview: afterwards, the desk staff at her medical practises deal with a barrage of phone calls, explaining to desperate people that her waiting list already stretches months ahead.

"I don't need any more patients, but it's a message that needs to be told," Dr Hungerford says.

GP and author Carole Hungerford will be online between 12 noon and 2pm Friday to answer your questions about the links between health, food, farming and the environment. Click here to read the online discussion.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Instead of blaming farmers, take a look at the rubbish in some of the fast foods.
Posted by THE FARMER, 25/03/2009 10:32:23 PM
Linking these very legitimate questions to "depleted soils" draws altogether too long a bow and shows a surprising lack of understanding of plant biology.

Good food is good food, no matter what type of soil it was grown on.

We have supposedly stringent regulations controlling added chemical content in our foods, so only if something is slipping through the net could this problem lie there.

This is certainly an area which requires continuing research. As an asthmatic, and therefore aware that asthma is an extraordinary problem in Australia and New Zealand, I would like to see research directed to closely scrutinise the effect that antibiotics have on our health.

My mother was a nurse when penicillin arrived. She said of it: "All of a sudden our pneumonia patients stopped dying". She also told me in the 1950s that you must not use penicillin indiscriminately because, with excessive use, the bugs would in time would build up a resistance to the penicillin.

That was in the 1950s. Yet ever since antibiotics have been prescribed on a "just in case" basis for every second sore toe, with the result that we now have bugs which are immune to all antibiotics. This, surely, represents the height of medical irresponsibility.

I have long suspected that antibiotics may have side effects which have not yet been identified, side effects quite possibly affecting our immune systems.

Another area which needs continuing research is immunisation. It would be madness to suggest we should not immunise, but there certainly are some problems there, there could be problems as yet unidentified, and identifying them could enable a solution to be found.

An item of history of antibiotics, courtesy of 2CR talkback radio a few years ago, when an elderly lady rang in. In England in the 1880s her grandfather got blood poisoning from a scratch on his leg. This caused great consternation in the household, because blood poisoning in those days meant near certain death. The breadwinner was about to die.

Her grandmother answered a knock on the door, to find a hawker there. He inquired the cause of her distress, went out to his cart and brought back some mouldy bread and some cobwebs, with instructions of how to make these into a poultice to be applied to the wound. The wound healed miraculously, her grandfather survived.

There was great excitement in her family when penicillin was announced, because this explained it all more than 50 years later. The question then is, if the hawker knew this, why didn't the scientists know? Perhaps he was an Arab or a Gypsy, or from some other culture which may have known of this for a very long time.

Posted by Ted O'Brien, 26/03/2009 12:22:52 AM
I have not read Dr Carole Hungerford's book but going on the editorial above, she is absolutely right. We must stop growing food with the aid of toxic chemicals and GMOs and stop destroying our precious soils in the process.

It's time for many to wake up to the deception and destruction that both agricultural chemicals and GMOs pose to the environment and to individual health.

Congratulation to Rural Press for running this story, it's time people were fully informed about their food choices.

Posted by ggwagga, 26/03/2009 4:11:05 AM
It's fine for the good doctor to have a hypothesis, but now, like any good scientist, she must put her research up for peer review. Then we can all make a judgment on what, on the face of it, are quite alarming views.

The world is full of alarmists, however. We should remember that during the time referred to, 40 years, the population of the world has doubled and, by and large, agriculture, farmers, have fed those people. Sure, there is hunger in the world, but we, all of us, forget that the money we spend on wars would very quickly stop the children dying.

Posted by Roger Crook, 26/03/2009 4:45:38 AM
If your patients can wait three months to see you, I'd venture most of them are suffering from stress related illnesses, chronic fatigue, aching everything, general malaise. But how can the good Dr jump to the conclusion that modernity is causing the illness?

Where are the double blind trials confirming the objective fact that a certain food additivce or lack of nutrient dense vegetable (a definition of this would also be welcome) is the cause?

Book writing and short courses don't make a Dr any more capable of obtaining a penetrating insight - rather the waiting list seems to be main consequence.


Posted by billy boy, 26/03/2009 4:59:35 AM
I absolutley agree with the good Dr. You dont have to be a rocket scientist to believe what she is saying. You could also add the air we breathe and too many people on the planet. It is a mess!
Posted by sylvia, 26/03/2009 6:38:22 AM
Why then is life expectancy continuing to rise?
Posted by Don, 26/03/2009 7:07:18 AM
As a grain grower and cattleman, I have never once added chlorine to our drinking water, put sulphates in wine, additives in food, processed food, grown anything except whole wheat.

Very irresponsible journalism to imply that farmers are making us sick when the article is really about over processing food.

I grow grain on 4000 acres which consists of roughly eight different soil types. Each season it is a different soil which produces the highest yield and/or protein. It depends on the climatic conditions that season. Wetter or drier. Hotter or colder.

To imply that the depleted soils are making us sick is too rediculous for words.

Posted by Realistic , 26/03/2009 7:07:43 AM
Realisitic, the headline is not the full story. In part, Dr Hungerford's argument is that deficiency of certain nutrients in food - often because of processing or food choices, not just soil deficiency - compromises the immune systems of a large number of people. But genetic and environmental factors are also at work, in Dr Hungerford's view.

Emphasis has been placed on the soil in this article simply to because of Rural Press's readership. It forms a relatively small part of Dr Hungerford's book.

As outlined in the full article in The Land, some nutrient deficiencies are inherent in Australian soils. I don't want to think about the hot hours I spent pushing selenium bullets into sheep during my youth in WA. In *some* cases, modern farming practices have also contributed to a documented rundown in certain nutrients. Again, more details are in the print version.

As for peer-reviewed references, Dr Hungerford cites 14 pages of references in the appendix to her book. This article can't hope to canvass all the information she provides, just provide a very broad outline of her argument.

Matt Cawood

Posted by Matt Cawood on 26/03/2009 8:35:11 AM
I am also a grain and cattle producer in rural NSW and I spent the last three years recovering my son and daughter from sensory problems.

We live a very healthy lifestyle. But my son had aluminium, mercury and lead levels coming out of his hair samples which are frightening.

Where did he get it from? You tell me. As a cattle producer, go and look at a vaccine box and Google the name of the preservative and tell me you do not add anything to our soils (it is also relevant for sheep as well).

My children are recovering because of a complete change in diet and compounded vitamin supplements. I have had western doctors tell me it was my parenting and my children were being naughty and to deal with it. I then found doctors who looked deeper at the causes and, with their instructions, I removed the foods and gave compounded vitamins based on test results.

They are now different children. Their immune systems were overwhelmed as babies and their bodies have not been able to work properly to kick out all the crap - preservatives, colours, flavours and heavy metals.

Hopefully, now they will have a chance to live a productive life in society.

Research came out in the UK this week that one in 60 kids have some from of autism. It has been proven with research in Calafornia USA last year that it is not just better diagnosis.

Something is not right - our children are our yellow canaries.

I just hope none of you have to walk this path of healing your children or grand children because I would not wish it on my worse enemy.

Posted by I walk the talk, 26/03/2009 7:40:12 AM
I haven't read the book either, but based on the article there is a fair bit of opinion and extrapolation going on here.

With agricultural commodity prices rising more slowly than cost imputs over most of my lifetime (I'm now 53), farmers can't afford to be depleting their soils because that leads to lower yields, leading to lower profitability, leading to them ceasing to be farmers.

Let's see some research results using scientific method and peer review before we blindly accept the hypothesis being put forward.

Unfortunately, the decreasing knowledge of agricultural activities by city folk as time, economic, family and other factors force us apart, leads the city folk to be more easily swayed by minority redical elements pushing various bandwagons who get such good media coverage in the city.

As a community, we need to be careful that imposts and regulation we impose on agriculture are well thought out and based on science and that we are aware the likely consequences (cost, environmental and otherwise), or we will have serious difficulty feeding and clothing ourselves in coming decades in the manner to which we have become accustomed.

PS - I have a daughter with an anaphylactic food allergy to peanuts, so I understand the concern in the community about why these allergies, asthma and other afflictions are on the rise.

However, we will only arrive at the correct answers using rigorous scientific method.

Posted by wino, 26/03/2009 7:51:00 AM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Dr Carole Hungerford.
Dr Carole Hungerford.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
23 March, 2009
24 March, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you believe rural property prices will continue to rise despite the economic downturn?

Yes
(38.6%)

No
(54.9%)

Undecided
(6.5%)

Total Votes: 603
Poll Date: 22 March, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...