News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Wind farms change land values 

Wind farms change land values

14 Nov, 2008 11:39 AM
WIND farms are blowing land values off course, slashing property tags by up to a third in some areas and lifting others by as much $50,000 per turbine.

A new study shows the presence of wind turbines significantly influence land values – but it’s not all bad.

The study co-incides with a new push by the Federal Government to speed up the building opf wind farms across Australia.

Ballarat-based value Alan Hives said there had now been enough sales of property featuring or near wind farms to draw some conclusions of their impact on property values.

Essentially, he said, the more intrusive the wind turbines in “lifestyle” terms, the bigger the price impact.

In some coastal areas of Gippsland with high lifestyle value, property values had fallen by as much as a third.

However in many other areas where farming was the focus the impact on land value had been insignificant – and in cases where there was an income stream from towers, the land price actually increased.

Mr Hives - who has 25 years experience as a valuer in the district - said almost 800 turbines could be in place within 45 minutes of Ballarat in coming years. More are tipped along the coast and in the highland areas of the State.

“It will have a very large impact on the look of the country, but the change in land value will depend on the site, the situation and the circumstances,” Mr Hives said.

At Waubra near Ballarat – where a third of a proposed 128 wind towers have now been built – Mr Hives said the impact on land values of town, rural-residential and lifestyle blocks and farming land had been mixed based on his assessment of at least 12 properties.

“It is very subjective as not everyone dislikes the look of the towers. The value is very much in the eye of the beholder,” he said.

“For rural land there does not seem to be a big change in value as it does not effect production.

“For lifestyle blocks it can reduce prices but not often. With the market being so strong in recent years this effect may have been masked.”

Mr Hives said the prospect of lease payments of about $8000 per year per turbine had increased the value of land in the area with turbines by as much as $40,000-$50,000 per tower.

He noted that most developers limited financial rewards to landholders with turbines actually on their land.

“In Europe there is a much more equitable payment system where people next door receive 50pc of the lease payment and residents further away receive a 25pc payment as compensation. Such a system seems a little fairer that the holder takes all payment system proposed for many wind farms.”

Mr Hives said few people had yet considered the impact of wind towers on property values down the track.

“Currently the effect is not universal but will those areas close to the towers appreciate in value at a different rate to the unaffected areas in the future? Clearly this will depend on a range of factors not just the towers but principally on the broader economic conditions.”

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett last week announced State and territory environment ministers had agreed to advance the development of national wind farm guidelines.

Mr Garrett said the new guidelines would "improve consistency and transparency in the wind farm planning and approval process" and help address some of the barriers to wind farm development.

"Wind energy has the potential to deliver a significant proportion of Australia’s future electricity needs and has an important role to play in helping Australia achieve our target of producing 20 per cent of our electricity needs from renewable sources by 2020," Mr Garrett said.

A report on wind farm establishment, given to the Government last week, looked at a range of impediments holding back the growth of wind farming, and recommended new guidelines to help address these at a national level.

Mr Garrett said while responsibility for the assessment and approval of proposed wind farms rests primarily with the States and territories, there could be room for the Federal Minister for the Environment to step in where the proposal might be of national significance.

Federal Minister for Agriculture, Tony Burke, said any roll out of wind farms provided farmers with another option of what to do on their land.

"I don't think wind farms and agricultural purposes are necessarily mutually exclusive," Mr Burke said.

"There's no end of farms that I've visited in last 12 months that are using renewable energy on their own premises, if there's an opportunity for them to do that as well as pump back into the grid.

"That potentially provides an extra flow of income for farmers and they'll make the decisions about what to do on their land."

Mr Burke said the development of wind farms had not reached the same stage as controversial managed investment schemes, where it's argued big corporate companies – not farmers – are moving into the property market to buy farms for their developments.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
When this document was formulated the wind towers were hardly up! It's surprising Mr Hives didn't take a closer look at Waubra township where to this day numerous homes are unable to be sold. Also what isn't mentioned is how neighbours to this particular wind farm are looking at legal action aginst the landholders with turbines for property devaluation...
Posted by Jan, 14/11/2008 12:57:07 PM
It about time the media had a close look at the contracts that the Landholders sign up to.

The landholders might be able to read it but they couldn't understand it! visit http://www.spacountryguardians.or g.au/contract.php or google landholder contract review to see the contract Buckle used at waubra.

Posted by Pete Babcock, 14/11/2008 1:02:50 PM
The wind farms do devalue land, even property surrounding the ill fated Tuki wind farm are unable to be sold.

When one was sold it made a record low price! Tuki hasn't even be built, but just stalled at the starting blocks and it's had an impact on real estate.

Toss turbines out. Go solar....

Posted by Legless Lizard, 14/11/2008 1:05:53 PM
Wind farms suck - they're community wreckers. Stockyard Hill is a mess and we could even get one person to stand in the Lake Goldsmith ward. Well done Wind Power pty ltd you've mucked this community up. Stockyard Hill wind farm is a dud and won't get of the ground - too far to the grid and a credit crisis tossed in too!
Posted by Dick , 14/11/2008 1:09:25 PM
This is another sad story in rural victoria, pushed upon farmers by a inept State Labor government which has no feeling for those outside city limits. The developers proposing these schemes are only interested in money, using contracts that put much pressure on the farmer should something go wrong. Why on earth does any government want to build more of these towers? They have not, or will not ever, close down a coal or nuclear power station. No where in the world has this happened since their inception.

Wind power is a feel-good solution for city politicians and greens who have no idea how the electricity grid works and no concern for country people affected by these useless monstrosities.

Posted by rich, 14/11/2008 1:10:14 PM
I'd certainly rather buy a property away from a windfarm than near to one. Why would you pay more for land that would be affected by noise and view than not affected?

This is simple economics that it would be devalued. Much better to subsidise solar power and hot water than waste time with wind.

It only causes problems with small towns, and provides a intermittant power supply.

Posted by mick, 14/11/2008 1:30:09 PM
Will the wind industry and the Victorian government finally admit that neighbouring property is devalued and come up with a fairer system of compensation - at least?

They are responsible for the horrendous community division that happens around wind power facilities by ignoring important issues like this.

Posted by Steve, 14/11/2008 2:33:42 PM
No wonder so many rural Australians are becoming more and more annoyed at the seemingly uninhibeted progression of wind farms.

Would you want to build a home next to one of these on vacant land you already held? I think not.

This is typcal of city centric Labor pollies, trying to show off to the green minority, using a very visable, but extremly dubious way of producing power.

If these turbines were so good why do the developers and government keep all the production figures secret?

They are openly obtainable from other generating systems. The fact that they are secret tells us there is a cover up - something most of us know anyway and have come to expect.

Wind farms are nothing more than a get-rich quick scheme for the developers. The subsidy on offer makes this a no brainer/

If they were any good, why would they need a subsidy?

Posted by peter m, 14/11/2008 4:16:29 PM
visit spacountryguardians.org.au for all the info on wind
Posted by Jan, 15/11/2008 7:19:22 AM
Do some research - they're a con on the landholder, the consumer and the community. Wind is an inefficient power source!
Posted by Pete Babcock, 15/11/2008 12:39:35 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Wind farms split rural communities
Wind farms split rural communities

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural MON0152
 
Small Farms Expo
 
Freedom Tanks
 
Irwin HunterIrwin Hunter
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
FBG
 
WA Merino Magazine
 
photo gallery


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...