News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Abbott's chance to govern 

Abbott's chance to govern

09 Sep, 2010 04:09 AM
THE Greens and the independents have offered Tony Abbott the opportunity to help govern from opposition, saying they would pass any policies with which they agreed, including paid parental leave, whether Labor liked it or not.

As the political establishment comes to grips with the concept of minority government, the Greens leader Bob Brown said the Parliament belonged to everybody, not just the government.

''Please think about it,'' he said.

He was backed by the independent Tony Windsor, who suggested the Coalition tone down its venomous attacks on the government and independents.

''There's good stuff that can come from anywhere and that's why the Liberals are silly to be running this sort of stuff,'' he told the Sydney Morning Herald.

''They can do things with us and the executive won't have the power to shut them down. The opposition can be part of the government, too.''

The opposition childcare spokeswoman, Sharman Stone, was attracted to the idea of putting forward the Coalition's generous paid parental leave scheme which the Greens broadly favour.

''Our lines of communication have always been open to anyone who wants to talk about helping to deliver our better policy,'' she said.

The Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young was keen to explore the idea.

Senator Brown suggested weekly policy meetings with Mr Abbott, as he will have with the Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, and mentioned possible policy deals on mental health, dental care and biosecurity.

The opportunity was offered as the Coalition abandoned Mr Abbott's pledge of a kinder and gentler polity and challenged the very legitimacy of the minority Labor government, saying it was unstable, unworkable and defied commonsense.

The claims of instability were dampened when it emerged the shadow finance minister, Andrew Robb, had spent the day sounding out colleagues about challenging Julie Bishop for the deputy leadership at today's party-room meeting.

The move was called off late Wednesday after powerbrokers intervened, saying it would destabilise the Coalition at a time it was trying to portray the government as unstable.

If Mr Robb had been successful, he would have been able to choose the portfolio of shadow treasurer which he desires, pushing out Joe Hockey.

Liberal MPs said Mr Robb's aborted move was a warning that they expected Mr Abbott to agree to significant changes next week when he reshuffles his frontbench, not the minimal changes flagged on Tuesday.

Ms Gillard governs with the bare majority of 76 seats, thanks to the support of the Greens MP, Adam Bandt, and the three independents, Mr Windsor, Andrew Wilkie and Rob Oakeshott.

Mr Oakeshott is considering accepting the newly created cabinet post of minister for regional Australia but fears it may bind his vote and is seeking advice.

The independents have agreed only to guarantee stability of tenure by supporting the government against reckless no-confidence motions and to ensure supply.

Mr Abbott attacked Ms Gillard, saying she was as illegitimate as her government because she had been installed by factions and then by independents. ''It is a government that's utterly without a mandate,'' he said.

Coalition MPs, furious that Mr Windsor and Mr Oakeshott sided with Labor, lined up to demand the end of the arrangement and predicted its early demise.

''This is an illegitimate government that is inherently unstable,'' Mr Hockey said.

The Liberal Senator George Brandis implied corruption by saying the government had ''as much legitimacy as the Pakistani cricket team''.

Their rage was fuelled by Mr Windsor saying that the tax summit which the independents had secured from the government should examine the mining tax.

The Treasurer, Wayne Swan, said that was not part of the agreement and that the mining tax was being reviewed by a panel led by the former BHP Billiton chairman Don Argus.

Mr Oakeshott backed Mr Swan and later Mr Windsor said he had made a mistake.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Govern - losers don't govern, they heel!
Posted by Tigerdicky, 9/09/2010 3:59:16 AM
Less tax more spending, how come nobody thought of this before ?
Posted by John Niven, 9/09/2010 6:00:10 AM
I don't think Christopher Pyne is interested. He's reinforced this morning that because the Libs aren't in government, their job is to oppose. Haven't you learned yet that going negative just for the sake of it is not helpful, not productive. Both parties are now in a wonderful position where if they were willing to work with each other, real, meaningful changes could be made. But no, Whiney Piney just wants to whine some more. In light of that, the Indies were right to support the ALP.
Posted by Fair Dinkum Country Cousin, 9/09/2010 6:41:11 AM
Careful fellas, here there be dragons...now that we have a good strong opposition that's probably the best way to go, keep the so- called govt on their toes. No way they are the mob of happy clappers that they'd like us to think they are, although Country Cousin has been sucked in.
Posted by a GRAZIER, 9/09/2010 7:56:45 AM
What a chaotic mess we would have if every group in the parliament could do its own thing as suggested by the Greens.
Posted by jock, 9/09/2010 8:02:26 AM
It appears the spoiled rich kids just can't accept they haven't got their own way. I assume they will continue to throw tantrums until everyone finally ignores them or they get their own way. Now is the time for the media to focus on the potential positives rather than give space to the petulant spoilt rich brats.
Posted by bazza, 9/09/2010 8:42:21 AM
Well I have been 'sucked in' too 'a grazier' as I agree with Country Cousin. Whilst things may be a bit turbulent at times, at least we won't have garbage stuffed down our throats by the arrogance of a party with a majority in its own right. Like for example when Howard and Abbott hit us with the GST and then broke their promise to reduce personal income tax.
Posted by daw, 9/09/2010 9:59:51 AM
And, Jock, how efficient it would be if we had a real Strong Man at the top, standing for no nonsense from the rabble! Oh - hang on a minute - that's dictatorship, isn't it. We fought a war against that. And consider that the stable prosperous democracies of northern Europe all have multi-party systems, with all shades of opinion in the mix. Sometimes it gets clunky, but people do feel represented. Personally, I don't care much for Tony Gillard or Julia Abbott.
Posted by nico, 9/09/2010 10:35:00 AM
Grazier, Country Cousin hasn't been sucked in, and jock, what a wonderful democracy we would have if every vote was a conscious vote! Grazier, what you obviously don't understand is that under this parliament's structure, the opposition has the possibility of governing, of actually effecting change from the opposition benches. Unfortunately, the only way that will happen is if the opposition puts Australia's best interests ahead of the need to "oppose", and actually shows up to work, ready to contribute. Clearly that's not on Whiney Piney's agenda. Why do I think the Indies were right to select the ALP? Because if they'd gone with the Coalition, they wouldn't have governed then either, because they would've been more interested in protecting their position than in governing.
Posted by Fair Dinkum Country Cousin, 9/09/2010 10:47:49 AM
Like all of you, I will just have to wait and see how Parliament actually performs. Reform of Question Time is a positive - unless it gets trampled underfoot if it proves inconvenient. Complaints about the Opposition launching negative attacks fail to recognise that the role of an opposition is to hold the government of the day to account and to present itself as an alternative. It is everybody's responsibility to judge politicians on their performance - so enough already with the immature insults. All voters need to study the analyses and make up their own mind which politician has the most credibility.
Posted by Not convinced, 9/09/2010 11:57:40 AM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
08 September, 2010
POLL
Q: Do you believe a minority government formed with the support of the independents can provide a stable and effective administration?

Yes
(23.5%)

No
(70.6%)

Undecided
(6%)

Total Votes: 904
Poll Date: 05 September, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...