News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 BSE beef backflip leaves US stewing 

BSE beef backflip leaves US stewing

10 Mar, 2010 08:54 AM
United States ambassador to Australia Jeffrey Bleich will meet Agriculture Minister Tony Burke today to raise concerns about the government's decision to extend a ban on beef imports for two years.

The Australian Financial Review reports the US had lobbied for the ban to be lifted, and the Australian government's decision to reinstate it has created tensions in the relationship two weeks before President Barack Obama is due to visit Canberra.

"It's definitely a change from what we were hearing as recently as just last week," Agricultural counsellor at the US embassy in Canberra Grant Pettrie said.

"US beef is safe to trade. We don't have BSE [bovine spongiform encephalopathy]. We only had three cases and haven't had a case in four years. We go out and test for it all the time – probably more than Australia does."

As to whether the US viewed the import risk analysis, which will take two years, as a barrier to trade, Mr Pettrie replied: "Well, the product can't come in, can it?" He said the US would probably only sell an annual $US15 million ($16.5 million) of beef to Australia, but it was important on principle that the ban be lifted.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It is an important principle that anyone selling beef into Australia's domestic market operates under the same protocols that Australian producers do, ie an individual animal whole-of-life traceback system.
Posted by Qlander, 10/03/2010 12:08:39 PM
So the US slaps our beef with a tariff as soon as it hits the US mainland and that is not protectionism but trying to protect our country from a non-curable disease is? We all know the risk of importing BSE is incredibly small, but it is still a risk, given beef exports are a multi billion dollar export market, why threaten it? We currently import more from the US then we export to them, so why is the US jumping up and down? The EU also prohibit any imports of beef that has had HGPs in it...The World Health Organisation says HGPs are perfectly safe.... Why is the EU's refusal to allow HGP treated beef not seen as protectionism? Also bare in mind that US beef is government subsidised in so far as the grain fed to them is government subsidised to keep prices artificially low. I am a great believer in fair trade, not free trade.
Posted by Frank, 10/03/2010 2:56:13 PM
What the US doesn't mention is that Australia produces beef, pays a myriad of government and statutary authority charges on it, exports it across the most expensive waterfront in the world, ships it to the other side of the planet and sells it cheaper than the US can produce it. So they slap a tarrif on it to make it dearer. And they want to dump their subsidised, unwanted product onto our market as well. The tragic part of this is that so many people supposedly representing the interests of Australian beef producers and processors think that this is perfectly OK! We are so lucky to have them.........
Posted by Brindi, 10/03/2010 5:58:44 PM
Dead right Qlander. Also that the exporting country operate on the same playing field as we do in Australia in regards to subsidies received by US beef producers amounting to about $200/head! How in the hell are we able to compete with that? At the quoted 50 cents a kilo import costs it is obvious that US beef, if of similar quality, would be a far more atractive option in the display cases at our major supermarkets. Don't ever let this product in, we import enough from the US now in the form of manufactured goods, machinery etc. to cover the tit for tat free trade agreement!
Posted by Pat, 10/03/2010 6:21:37 PM
Steve Kay said today on ABC radio from the USA, who the QCL also converse with for opinion, 34 tonnes not being allowed in to Australia was similar to a pimple on an elephant's rear end, not his words but something the same. Please QCL be objective in your comments - you can be critical of Agforce, CCA, MLA & RMAC & Jon & Mr Cooper you'll still get free meals & hold hands with the big boys. Meat coming in with no traceability when we have full traceability (hee hee) just shouldn't happen. I'm sure all the above named agree.
Posted by les, 10/03/2010 6:31:26 PM
The US comment that they don't have BSE can probably be attributed to the fact that they stopped testing for it.
Posted by Snow bound, 10/03/2010 11:11:58 PM
DOes anyone really care what the bullies of the world markets actually think? They must think that when they click their fingers all of their 'servants' (in their own minds this can be read as: the rest of the world), will come running. USA. STOP AND LOOK AT YOURSELF. It is called NEGOTIATION. We have been trying to get a FTA with you for years. Take your head out of the sand and realise that there is a whole new world out here now and the rest of the world doesn't pant and await your beck and call.
Posted by time4change, 11/03/2010 3:14:44 AM
Our NLIS does not work, 34% of cattle missing on database, it is a half billion dollar white elephant. There is no trace forward from the knocking box to individual cuts of meat so offers no safety benefits to the consumer. Why have the coalition changed their policy on imports from BSE affected countries by pushing this private members bill. A majority of producers and consumers want imports stopped, the government should act accordingly. How dare Mr Bleich seek talks with us over the BSE issue when Mark Vaile helped them regain their share of our markets when he signed the BSE sideletter attached to the USA Aus FTA. Since the signing of the FTA in 04 our trade deficit with the USA has increased by at least 4.5 billion so much for free trade it is a joke. I am geting weary of gutless politicians from both sides.
Posted by Brad Bellinger, 11/03/2010 4:54:59 AM
Australia should exercise extreme caution and take every measure to ensure our food production and consumption remains FOREVER FREE of the diseases that impact other nations. The US is only interested in getting an okay from Australia as a next step to attempt to re-enter the Japan and S Korea markets where their beef is currently banned. Apart from that they couldn't give a gazoo about Australia as a market. They can compete more effectively when the playing field is levelled and 'clean nations' like Australia demonstrate their apparent acceptance of US beef. Krudd and Co have already demonstrated their disregard for Australian beef producers, the value of remaining clean and green by ensuring that BSE is never an issue here and its complete disregard for Aussie consumers. Remember that at election time.
Posted by JJ, 11/03/2010 5:31:07 AM
The danger for us is perhaps not from the small amount of imported subsidised beef that may profit the supermarkets (so long as it does remain small). It will be the perception in our important export markets, such as Japan, which has clearly demonstrated its unwillingness to import such U.S. beef, that Australia has lost its reputation for untainted food production.
Posted by AckAck, 11/03/2010 5:54:55 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
09 March, 2010
POLL
Q: Should the Federal Government step in and overhaul the corporate structure of Australian Wool Innovation?

Yes
(42.4%)

No
(43.3%)

Not yet
(14.3%)

Total Votes: 413
Poll Date: 07 March, 2010
BLOGS
04 March, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...