News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Climate policy backlash takes shine off Rudd 

Climate policy backlash takes shine off Rudd

08 Feb, 2010 03:45 AM
SUPPORT for Kevin Rudd and his flagship policy, the emissions trading scheme, has fallen sharply following the failure of the Copenhagen climate change conference and Tony Abbott's ascension to the opposition leadership.

The latest Herald/Nielsen poll also shows although the Coalition has made significant inroads into Labor's support, the Government would still win an election comfortably if it were held now.

The poll - the first conducted by the Herald since Mr Abbott replaced Malcolm Turnbull on December 1 - sampled 1400 voters from Thursday night to Saturday night following a week of robust parliamentary debate over climate change.

Mr Rudd's rating as preferred prime minister has plunged 9 points to 58 per cent since the last poll in late November, while Mr Abbott is favoured by 31 per cent of voters, 10 points higher than Mr Turnbull's final rating.

For the previous 18 months, support for an ETS was steady at two-thirds of voters, or 66 per cent. But the latest poll shows that since late November, support has dived 10 points to 56 per cent, while opposition to the ETS has risen 4 points from 25 per cent to 29 per cent.

After Mr Abbott deposed Mr Turnbull, he immediately abandoned Coalition support for an ETS, branded it a ''great big tax'' and, last week, announced a rival scheme in which businesses would voluntarily reduce emissions in return for taxpayer-funded payments.

The poll finds 45 per cent prefer Mr Abbott's emissions reduction fund while 39 per cent support Mr Rudd's ETS.

However, Mr Rudd retains more credibility on climate change than Mr Abbott. When asked whose broad approach to climate change they supported most, 43 per cent of voters backed Mr Rudd while 30 per cent backed Mr Abbott.

''One thing that hasn't changed is the relatively high level of confusion in the electorate about climate-change policy,'' the Nielsen pollster John Stirton said.

The poll shows Labor leading the Coalition on a two-party-preferred basis by 54 per cent to 46 per cent. The Coalition's primary vote has shot up 4 points to 41 per cent, while Labor's has stayed steady at 42 per cent.

Mr Rudd's approval rating fell 6 points to a still high 60 per cent while his disapproval rose 4 points to 33 per cent.

Mr Abbott's approval rating was 44 per cent, which is 3 points higher than the final rating of his predecessor, and his disapproval rating was 41 per cent, 10 points up on Mr Turnbull's final showing.

''This is a good start for Mr Abbott but the Opposition has a way to go,'' Mr Stirton said. ''If an election were held now, the Rudd government would be returned with its majority largely intact.''

With internal polling showing similar results, Mr Abbott told the ABC yesterday he was not getting carried away. ''We've made a good start but that's all you can say,'' he said.

Mr Turnbull will speak today in support of the ETS and is under pressure from colleagues to abstain from voting rather than cross the floor. Mr Abbott said yesterday he would prefer Mr Turnbull did not cross the floor but he was free to do so. ''My argument is with Kevin Rudd, not Malcolm Turnbull.''

The Government is pressing ahead with its ETS but is looking to change the subject to health and the economy and yesterday it began targeting Mr Abbott and his finance spokesman, Barnaby Joyce, as economic risks, citing the emissions fund as an example.

''Mr Abbott [is] a big economic risk … a risk on climate change and a risk to the economy,'' the Deputy Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, told the Nine Network. ''You can't, as the alternate prime minister, spit out policies that simply don't add up.''

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
its clear that when you speak to people in the street or where ever that they are almost all sick of hearing about climate change etc. There seems to have been a major change in peoples opinions to this topic over the last 6 months. I'd love to see a survey done on who believes in man made climate change in the mainstream press.
Posted by peter, 8/02/2010 8:00:39 AM
Why should I let the politicians make me feel guilty about the type of lightbulbs I use in my house when they enthusiastically endorse the export of millions and millions of tonnes of coal?
Posted by Rusty, 8/02/2010 9:21:54 AM
Peter: I've already posted this on Lucy's blog but I will repost it here. A recent survey in England had only 26% of the population believing in man-made climate change. 38% said it hasn't been proven yet. The rest saying, that either the whole thing is a massive green con. Or that the climate hasn't even changed at all. Most tellingly in the space of two months approximately 15% of the population have gone from believing everything the scientists say to nothing at the scientists say. Trust is a fragile thing abuse it and you lose it. Then it is incredibly difficult to get back. In the same timeframe. In Australia an election fought on the basis of an EST, has gone from a Labour landslide. To what is looking increasingly like, to close to call. Clearly there has always been a significant proportion, of the population that have had their doubts about man-made climate change but haven't been game to voice them. Because of the overwhelmingly hostile political environment that previously existed.
Posted by Qlander, 8/02/2010 10:02:43 AM
Planet earth 4.5 billions years old. The earliest weather data recorded 150 years ago. Percentage of data that we have for the earths history 0.000003%. Yes it's getting warmer, yes we could be a lot smarter with our resources. But we are fast getting sick of hearing all this save the planet rubbish. The planet will out last mankind so why create another needless tax and another needless level of administration here in Australia? As if having 3 levels of government and 3 levels of taxes isn’t already enough!
Posted by Sick of hearing about it, 8/02/2010 11:21:46 AM
Well said, sick of hearing about it. To top that off people have to realise that if the world's atmosphere was an olympic size swimmimg pool then Australia's contribution is a tiny 2mm eye dropper of co2 once a year. And all of us that have not drunk the Gore Koolaid know that co2 is just a minor trace gas and plant food. It is not a pollutant, never was and never will be. If the co2 ppm were much lower than presant levels, plant life starts to die off. Co2 is the food of the living planet.
Posted by Loc Hey, 8/02/2010 12:23:05 PM
Climate change had nothing to do with the drought. Some bugger threw a "SHAMWOW" up in the air.
Posted by nsw grazier, 8/02/2010 1:32:57 PM
Poor Lamb Chop, he must be really squirming now that Cardinal George Pell has refuted climate change is man made, in fact he says that the earth is cooling. Lamb Chop, you had better go back to church, sounds as though you have been sacked.
Posted by jerangle, 9/02/2010 3:51:06 AM
This ETS is just a typical abuse of political power, the next project is to become a republic for China & Mr Rudd will be well rewarded as we are governed by China ! Even Mr Gore doesen't believe what he preaches otherwise he'd practice it instead burning as much carbon as possible.
Posted by ray, 9/02/2010 4:06:42 AM
..what Phil, only the ETS is taking the shine off Rudd and this government. How about the National Water Management of the Murray Darling that only they could deliver, which does not come into full effect until 2019, then there is Landcare, boat people, education/school websites. The list is endless and I can't think of a single thing they have done after all they promised that has changed my world positively. They are a collective gaggle of career pollies who have no idea about the real world they are supposed to represent. If you did your job properly Phil Coorey you would out Canberra of all these pollies and ensure that we had a Parliament who actually knew what was going on and ran this country properly.
Posted by katandra, 9/02/2010 4:26:33 AM
It's obvious from the comments that the people have woken up to the climate change scam. When will the media catch up and realise that we don't want scaremongering reports about the latest imagined catastrophe rammed down our throats day in day out? Give us a break guys and focus on something really important, like how Australia is going to pay off the massive debt Mr Rudd has left us with now he can't have his ETS.
Posted by Arden, 9/02/2010 4:36:26 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
05 February, 2010
04 February, 2010
POLL
Q: One year on from the Black Saturday bushfires, do you think governments are now conducting adequate preventative backburning?

Yes
(5.3%)

No
(89%)

Undecided
(5.7%)

Total Votes: 563
Poll Date: 07 February, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...