News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 'I'm the leader': Turnbull defiant on ETS 

'I'm the leader': Turnbull defiant on ETS

24 Nov, 2009 06:34 PM
LIBERAL leader Malcolm Turnbull is adamant that there is majority support within the Coalition to vote in favour of Labor's amended emissions trading scheme legislation, and has shouldered responsibility for the unravelling of his party and the threats to his leadership by declaring, "I'm the leader, I've made the call".

But he is now facing a leadership spill on Thursday as angry members seek to overturn his decision.

Mr Turnbull fronted the media after a tumultuous day in Canberra in which Labor gave significant concessions, including a major boost to agriculture and food processors, in order to appease the Coalition's concerns about the impacts of the ETS.

"[The deal] is good for the environment, it's good for farmers and it offers us the best ... near-term opportunity for CO2 abatement," Mr Turnbull said.

"There is no question that a majority of the party, and the joint party room, support the strong recommendation of the shadow cabinet [to vote in favour of the amended legislation]."

And while the Coalition's shadow cabinet was quick to endorse the deal, it is clear the joint Liberal-National party room was harder to convince, culminating after seven hours of talks in angry scenes and threats of a leadership spill against Mr Turnbull.

A number of tallies of the sentiment of the backbenchers who spoke at the party room meeting indicated the majority were in favour of either deferring or voting against the amended ETS legislation.

This included former Coalition climate change spokesman Andrew Robb, who shocked the party room by defying his leader and passionately arguing against the amended scheme, saying it was "just not good enough".

According to sources within the meeting, 39 speakers spoke against voting for the ETS amendments and just 33 were in favour.

But when Malcolm Turnbull factored in the support of the shadow cabinet members, who did not speak in the party room, he calculated that the majority of the party was in favour of the amendments.

Mr Turnbull's declaration that the party would be pressing ahead in supporting the amendments, and his claim to majority support for his stance, angered members and prompted chaotic scenes in the corridors of Parliament House.

Liberal Senators were particularly angered after the decision was announced while they were out of the meeting and voting on division within the Senate chamber.

Dissident Liberal Wilson Tuckey had earlier threatened to call for a leadership spill for this Thursday, but such were the emotions after Turnbull's declaration of victory that it appeared there would be an immediate leadership spill.

And while that did not eventuate, a spill has now been formerly requested to be held on Thursday.

Former Howard government minister Kevin Andrews told the media that he would stand against Turnbull if a spill was called.

Mr Andrews said Mr Turnbull had read the mood of the party room differently to the rest and that "needs to be challenged".

Backbencher Bronwyn Bishop said that "the party room needs to be listened to".

There also appeared to be strong support for Tony Abbott as the alternative leader.

It is clear that while the immediate threat has passed, Mr Turnbull's leadership is by no means secure, with Mr Tuckey reiterating his call for a leadership spill to be held on Thursday.

After Mr Turnbull's decision so obviously angered the partyroom, key figures tried to persuade their leader to adopt a position of deferring a final decision due to the imminent danger to his hold on the party leadership.

The Coalition had argued the merits of the legislation since 10am, with only a break for Question Time.

During that period the chances of the Coalition agreeing to the deal on offer from the Labor Government plummeted as the extent of backbench anger become increasingly apparent.

At lunch sources indicated a two-thirds majority were in favour of the amended ETS; that then slipped to 50:50 and then the tallies of party room sentiment were in the negative.

Sources say the atmosphere within the meeting was hostile at times, but that Mr Turnbull remained calm until his final announcement at which time he appeared rankled.

Notably, influential figures who have a keen eye for the detail of the legislation, told the meeting that the amendments would cost the taxpayer an extra $7 billion and not deliver any extra reduction in carbon emissions.

The resistance to Labor's package comes despite Labor's amendments providing for 75 per cent of the Coalition's demands.

Shadow Cabinet backed the package which was offered by the Government in bid to garner bipartisan support for its ETS and have the legislation pass the Senate this week.

Mr Macfarlane told reporters in Canberra prior to the party room meeting that he was very pleased with deal and described the negotiated package as "exceptional".

Sources earlier said Mr Turnbull needed up to 70pc of the joint party support vote on the deal for his on-going leadership position to be tenable.

It is now clear that both the party and his leadership are severely - if not irrevocably - wounded.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What a total pig .. Malcolm Turnbull should be sacked as Liberal leader as he is wrong saying that majority of people want an ETS. I KNOW NO ONE... EVERY ONE knows it's a world wide sham, conspiracy. I have never in all my life seen such a loud mouth politician sprouting that HE IS THE LEADER... Not for much longer... get rid of him please.
Posted by Jolly, 24/11/2009 7:17:25 PM
Call the spill and ditch Turnbull. He doesn't represent even his own party, let alone the people who voted Liberal at the last election. Who does he represent? The bankers who stand to make squillions from an ETS, that's who. You are a disgrace Malcolm, move over and let a real liberal lead the party.
Posted by Arden, 25/11/2009 4:11:25 AM
This is a sad day for Australia. Rudd's CPRS will have absolutely no impact on the level of global emissions, indeed it will have no impact on the level of Australia's emissions. All it will do is tax the public to compensate the high polluters. The only beneficaries will be the stock brokers and merchant bankers (many living in Turnbull's seat) who will churn the tax many times over, trading carbon credits and becoming billionaires from the commissions. To quote Ian Plimer, "Human stupidity is only exceeded by God's mercy which is infinite".
Posted by Bob, 25/11/2009 4:23:57 AM
How dare Turnbull railroad the vote. Rural Australia doesn't need a green/left/latte drinking city person speaking on our behalf. Get rid of him and get someone with less ego and more common sense.
Posted by Concerned Northerner, 25/11/2009 4:29:19 AM
The famous last words of Turnbull! Chisel them on his political headstone!
Posted by tigerdicky, 25/11/2009 5:34:06 AM
Mr. Turnbull is on record as saying he will not lead a party that is not as committed to carbon trading as he. His action of recent hours shows he has total committment to carbon trading, whilest his party does not. If he has any sense of responsibility, he must resign his leadership and make way for someone else to enable the Liberal party the opportunity to regain some credibility.
Posted by 'Rob Roy', 25/11/2009 6:15:34 AM
I want an ETS Jolly, it will make a very small difference in world emissions - very small as we are a small nation.
Posted by the lorax, 25/11/2009 6:55:13 AM
Yes let's get rid of Turnball and put a right wing faction leader in so they can revamp those beautiful policies such as work choices, the Pacific solution and chuck in the odd war or two and throw a few kids overboard. The conservative right wing of the opposition has shown its true colours - they are not interested in any sort of social or environmental justice, might is right and rich is right. Well I for one will stand until my last breath to fight for equality and fairness in society, between peoples, plants and planet.
Posted by the lorax, 25/11/2009 7:02:51 AM
Macfarlane is dumb enough to be dazzled by $7 billion but it is only $700 million a year, or just 3.5% of what Rudd splashed out on the stimulus package in a single year. If the Liberals don't dump Turnbull then the Coalition agreement must be scrapped. The Nationals should then invite all sceptical Liberals to change party and contest evey single seat of the "Vichy Liberals". Let's face it, Macfarlane and Turnbull have allowed Rudd to shift blame for the ETS onto them. And as long as Turnbull remains as leader the Liberal brand is fundamentally tainted.
Posted by Ian Mott, 25/11/2009 7:05:49 AM
Nice to see some serious action in Canberra for a change. I think a lot of good will come from this Liberal party stoush. It might shake some of the rubbish and complacency out of the Opposition. At the very least it directs attention to how these members of Parliament act and react. The Australian people are now more aware of these representatives. It is unfortunate that they did not have the guts as a group to stand up on their hind legs and do what they are paid to do, be an Opposition. The people of Australia have given them power in the Senate to act on these matters, not just to roll over. In our system good government depends on good opposition. At the moment we have neither. "We, the people, are not free. Our democracy is but a name. We vote, what does that mean? We choose between Tweedledum and Tweedledee." - Helen Keller. I can't quite figure out which one is Turnbull and which which one is the little Lego headed man. Maybe that's the point. No difference.
Posted by ozfirst, 25/11/2009 8:03:29 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull.
Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
24 November, 2009
POLL
Q: How has the deregulation of export wheat marketing affected your farm's profits this harvest?

Increased profits
(22.1%)

Decreased profits
(56.2%)

No change
(21.7%)

Total Votes: 258
Poll Date: 23 November, 2009
BLOGS
19 November, 2009
SPECIAL FEATURES

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...