News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 LHPA adds voice to BSE-beef import protest 

LHPA adds voice to BSE-beef import protest

25 Feb, 2010 08:19 AM
DIRECTORS and staff at a NSW Livestock Health and Pest Authority have written to the Federal Government objecting to the decision to allow beef imports from countries which have had bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) or mad cow disease.

The letter from the Cumberland LHPA, which surrounds metropolitan Sydney, has singled out their objection to beef imports from the US and Canada.

The Cumberland LHPA represents 13,149 rate payers of which 29 per cent produce cattle.

They said while industry leaders may have supported the Government's decision "few if any of our cattle-owning ratepayers would have been consulted".

"We believe the decision is contrary to the interests of Australian cattle producers and the beef consuming public", the letter sent to the Minister this week states.

"Regardless of the science associated with human health risk in North American beef, the product will become associated with human health risk in Australia (as it has in Japan and South Korea) and consumption of all beef will drop as a result of the decision.

"Consumers respond to perception, not science."

The letter - signed by the authority's chairman, Mark Honey, general manager Greg Wood and district vet, Keith Hart – acknowledges the BSE risk with North American beef is negligible.

But they say the scientific uncertainty surrounding chronic wasting disease (CWD) in North America was "an entirely different story and a real concern".

The letter questions the need to implement national livestock identification policies if Australia does not demand an equivalent whole of life traceability system.

It has asked the Commonwealth to introduce labelling rules for all beef from the US and Canada in the event the Government fails to change its mind.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Yay for gross stupidity. All of yous - see the movie "Food Inc" (or Food Incorporated). The US and A government is run by lobbiests. It's corrupt - that is why they are more than happy to serve us up germy feces contaminated feedlot beef, from cattle that are fed other minced up cattle brains etc., as cheap protein in their feed. Cattle only eat grass - not 100% corn, nor minced up cattle brains and offal etc., That's why the US and A has really toxic meat; and then they force us to accept it.
Posted by yo-yo, 25/02/2010 12:25:37 PM
havent seen food inc, but I have seen the movie "idiocracy" a bit like "yes minister" its as much social comment on real life as it is comedy.
Posted by bill, 25/02/2010 3:35:02 PM
brillient yo yo. at least you're not in support of it! but I wonder how many of aussie consumers really give a rats buttocks?? its only us producers can see the real outcome and thats the demise of our business
Posted by no joke, 25/02/2010 10:25:00 PM
Whats the problem , they are only promoting Paul Bleating's level playing field!
Posted by tigerdicky, 26/02/2010 5:31:26 AM
I'm not a Cattle producer or in any way associated with the industry, I'm rather concerned for my family, some might get the diseases for no fault of our own. Who do I sue the minister, the government, the pubic servant that needed to justify his/her job or the mad scientist that declared 0 risk ? I'm also concerned for all the jobs and export markets that the decision affects, tigerdicky said it right : it's the level playing field, stupid. Once we start to import diseased meat we will be considered to have the diseases in the herd so that both Korea an Japan can treat our export like the Yanks and Canadians!! BANNED
Posted by Peter Carabot, 26/02/2010 9:25:13 AM
Firstly does anyone know how I can go about protesting the import of beef? ie is there someone to write to? I am not a producer and I only eat meat a couple of times a week but lost a brother in law to BSE in the UK several years ago and can tell you it is no joke. How ridiculous to import beef to this country when we have plenty ourselves - WHY would we even be considering doing this? Who will want to buy products when we won't know the source of the ingredients? And let's not forget the air/ship miles to get it here - perhaps if the environmental cost was added into the cost of the product nobody would be able to afford it.
Posted by fi, 1/03/2010 11:26:41 AM
This is the problem with these PEAK BODIES, Cattle Council, Agforce Qld, RMAC: a handful of people are making these decisions. Agforce heirachy wanted NLIS for traceability of cattle in Australia but now they want to let beef in to Australia with no traceability. Agforce didn't TRUST their members enough to let them have a YES/NO vote on NLIS & act accordingly. I believe the no vote would have been above 90%, that's why I won't join them. The BSE issue is another case of not conversing with members.
Posted by les, 10/03/2010 6:09:33 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
24 February, 2010
23 February, 2010
25 February, 2010
24 February, 2010
POLL
Q: Has the Meat Standards Australia system been good for sales of Australian red meat?

Yes
(46.6%)

No
(33.2%)

Undecided
(20.2%)

Total Votes: 410
Poll Date: 21 February, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...