News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Nationals to defy Liberals on water vote 

Nationals to defy Liberals on water vote

17 Jun, 2010 04:20 AM
THE Nationals are set this weekend to reject Opposition Leader Tony Abbott's proposal for a last-resort referendum to give the federal government power over the Murray-Darling basin.

The slap for Mr Abbott is contained in a motion before the party's federal conference that is expected to pass with strong support.

The referendum proposal is one of the main policy differences between the Coalition partners.

Mr Abbott said in January that a Coalition government would invite the states to refer power over the Murray-Darling water management to the Commonwealth. If the states were unwilling by mid-2012 to refer the powers necessary to manage the basin, the government would put the referendum question in conjunction with the 2013 election.

But the Nationals fear future federal governments could divert too much water back into the system for environmental purposes.

Opposition spokesman on water Barnaby Joyce said the motion would pass, but he would not be voting for it because he was a frontbencher.

''My view on a referendum is that it is the last proposition before the coming of Christ,'' he said. A referendum would be highly unlikely to pass without the support of the states, he said.

Liberal senator Simon Birmingham, from water-sensitive South Australia, said that having a referendum would be a last resort. ''But if you can't get the states to act more effectively on water than they are now, you need that last resort.''

Another motion calls on the Nationals in government to legislate for ''a balance'' between environmental needs and those of water users.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What is it that Barnaby doesn't understand about getting elected before trying to set policy ??? For goodness' sake soneone please put a sack over him and keep him quiet for the next six months. Otherwise the Coalition runs the risk of losing an un-losable election.
Posted by AJ, 18/06/2010 7:23:16 AM
Have you ever heard of a "Party Platform" AJ. It is the mix of policies that voters expect to see before they elect a new government. And the party representing the people who are most effected by MDB policy, the Nationals, has every right, and a duty to make its position clear. In a properly functioning democracy those elements of the electorate that are not directly impacted by MDB policy (ie represented by Labor and the Liberals) would have the good grace to keep their ignorant noses out of issues they know nothing about and have demonstrated no intention of informing themselves properly. The Nationals wouldn't dream of imposing their views on urban infrastructure development on the Liberal Party so what the hell are the Liberals doing imposing their ignorant views on the rural community.
Posted by Ian Mott, 18/06/2010 7:44:26 AM
What is democracy when it comes to the MDB?.Until there is one Federal Authority to administer the MDB, there will always be dissent among the ranks. Surely we don't have to have a Royal Commission to see if Australia requires a Federal Authority to manage water for all rural and urban communities.
Posted by Angasb, 18/06/2010 9:01:56 AM
The problem, angasb, is that the rural people of NSW, Victoria and Qld who live in the MDB must go through their respective metrocentric government intermediaries to get their perspective into the policy process. And by the time the metrotyrants are finished with it the message has morphed into the same ignorant crap being flogged by the metromorons of Adelaide. Metrocentrics in Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne simply cannot help themselves from sympathising with their fellow travellers from Adelaide. The result is both an effective disenfranchisement of all the residents of the Basin itself to their enduring detriment. Basically, Syd-Bris-Melb are indifferent to the real situation on the ground so they hand the whole process to the parasitic scum from Adelaide. This will be even worse under a single federal body. The bush will never get just and fair treatment on this sort of issue until we have the Premier of a rural State at the COAG table who is able to fund the kind of research that is currently suppressed under the negligent rule of the metrotyrants.
Posted by Ian Mott, 18/06/2010 1:49:04 PM
When you all start to speak about water, first look up the Australian constitution, from memory section 100. All politicans need to be bought to heel now, they are there to serve the people not their parties.
Posted by dirkot, 23/06/2010 3:57:02 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
16 June, 2010
POLL
Q: Who is your preferred Prime Minister?

Kevin Rudd
(8.4%)

Tony Abbott
(55.5%)

Julia Gillard
(7.3%)

Malcolm Turnbull
(17.3%)

Other
(11.5%)

Total Votes: 1329
Poll Date: 13 June, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...