News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 New party wants population debate 

New party wants population debate

08 Feb, 2010 08:39 AM
WHEN Kevin Rudd welcomed the idea of ''a big Australia'' by openly praising forecasts the country's population would boom from 22 million to 35 million by 2050, William Bourke decided it was time to act.

The Sydney small businessman believes the Prime Minister's remarks were so out of keeping with the feelings of most voters, he decided to form a political party.

Although he has never been involved in politics, Mr Bourke, 39, said his instincts told him Mr Rudd had slipped up badly last year when he said:'' ''I actually believe in a big Australia - I make no apology for that. I actually think it's good news that our population is growing.''

Mr Bourke says the huge increases in population forecast by the federal Treasury in its third intergenerational report are a direct result of government policies, including record immigration levels and the baby bonus. Yet the only public debate is on how to deal with the consequences of so many more people, not whether such growth is desirable.

He said ''the extreme and radical rate of population growth'' meant more high-rise apartment blocks, overcrowded transport networks and loss of parklands were inevitable, and it was time for a national debate about whether this was what people wanted.

Mr Bourke said he and a small group of like-minded people expect to reveal the name and plans for the party within three weeks and where they want to run candidates.

He refused to say who else was involved organising the party or to detail its policies beyond cutting most levels of immigration, apart from the numbers of refugees, to ensure Australia's population would remain at about 23 million over the long term.

The entrepreneur Dick Smith has backed the plans to form the party as ''a good idea'' because it might finally force the government and the opposition to publicly discuss an issue they refused to touch.

''I reckon Kevin Rudd's realised nine out of 10 people don't want a big Australia,'' he said.

Concern about population projections had increased along with concern about the impact of global warming. ''There was the hypocrisy of the PM going to Copenhagen saying he wants to reduce global warning and double the population. You just can't do it,'' he said .

Last week Mr Smith launched the second edition of Overloading Australia, a book by Mark O'Connor and William Lines, which argues that Australia has the highest rate of population growth of any comparable country and that it should peg its population at present levels.

Joining him at the launch were other like-minded thinkers including the former NSW premier Bob Carr, singer John Williamson and Clean Up Australia founder Ian Kiernan.

He said the fear of being branded racist had scared environmental groups from discussing the issue of population increase despite its huge impact on the natural environment.

Mr Smith said all governments encouraged high levels of growth because that was what big business wanted, especially property developers, who depended on an ever-increasing demand for accommodation to maximise their profits.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1



RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I like this boy!
Posted by tigerdicky, 8/02/2010 9:09:27 AM, on The Land
The idea is appealing, but given the current world population and future projections. I'm not too sure that that is a decision we will be allowed to make alone. The other problem is the population bubble caused by the boomers. When they all retire if we don't find someone to plug the massive hole left in the workforce. Things are going to get very tough indeed.
Posted by Qlander, 8/02/2010 10:36:55 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Got my vote.
Posted by Loc Hey, 8/02/2010 10:42:33 AM, on The Land
Finally common sense.
Posted by Get Real, 8/02/2010 1:32:28 PM, on North Queensland Register
Where do I sign up. Can't wait to find out how to vote for this sensible man.
Posted by cocerned, 8/02/2010 3:04:27 PM, on The Land
About time someone stepped forward with some sensible statements regarding the future of this country.
Posted by jerangle, 8/02/2010 4:19:32 PM, on The Land
Before we get too excited, wouldn't it be a good idea to know a little more about Mr Bourke? The article says he is a small businessman and that he has never been in politics before, and that is the sum total information provided. He sounds just like another young ambitious "politician" "on the make" looking for a gimmick to seek attention. And of course, people need to see some intelligent workable policies before they rush off in adulation and fight each other in the queue to sign up. The fact that the great Australian opportunist and sometime hypocrite, Dick Smith, is on-side is not a good start. The fact that the immediate positive support comes from the usual superficial thinking posters suggests that there is about to emerge someone who thinks he can take advantage of emerging redneckism in the self-perceived disadvantaged in the community.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 8/02/2010 6:56:00 PM, on The Land
I'd hardly call the likes of Carr, Keirnan and Williamson superficial thinking Bushie Bill. I think this bloke has a valid point. The only people who will benefit from this massive increase in population are in big business and the environment will be the first casualty. I'll wait to hear what he has to say, but it is high time that someone stood up for those of us who know that this is unsustainable population increase and we are entitled to have our say at the ballot box.
Posted by robbo, 9/02/2010 12:41:13 PM, on Farm Weekly
Why wouldn't we get excited. Everyone is about fed up with the two party system which disenfranchises the people with bipartisan approaches to immigration, globalism etc.
Posted by Maca, 9/02/2010 1:00:43 PM, on Farm Weekly
The delusion that mindless population growth is a perpetual motion machine for economic growth is a folly; the problems associated with filling every nook and cranny with more of us are very difficult to unravel.
Posted by the people plague, 9/02/2010 1:12:05 PM, on The Land
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
William Bourke ... population should remain at present levels.
William Bourke ... population should remain at present levels.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
05 February, 2010
04 February, 2010
POLL
Q: One year on from the Black Saturday bushfires, do you think governments are now conducting adequate preventative backburning?

Yes
(5.3%)

No
(89%)

Undecided
(5.7%)

Total Votes: 563
Poll Date: 07 February, 2010

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural MON0152
 
Irwin HunterIrwin Hunter
 
Small Farms Expo
 
Freedom Tanks
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
FBG
 
WA Merino Magazine
 
photo gallery


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...