News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 Barley 
 AWB to pay executives $2.5m to stay on 

AWB to pay executives $2.5m to stay on

10 Jan, 2009 01:24 PM
Grains trader AWB has put in place a $2.5 million loyalty scheme of incentive payments designed to retain its senior executives.

But the payments pale against the multimillion-dollar salaries earned by current and former heads of AWB's Geneva commodities trading business.

Thierry Dubois, who ran AWB Geneva until leaving on January 26 last year, was paid $6.5 million in retirement benefits, for a total of $6.75 million in 2008.

He collected a total of $6.57 million the previous year, including a $5.86 million bonus, which a spokesman for AWB said related to Geneva's $70 million profit that year.

Mr Dubois' successor, Piero Ravano, who was promoted from head of the chartering operations, received $2.2 million for 2008, including a $1.76 million bonus.

The packages of both men exceeded the earnings rate of the man who runs all of AWB, managing director Gordon Davis.

AWB, which abandoned a $2.5 billion merger scheme with fellow grains group ABB at year's end, revealed the executive payments in its 2008 annual report.

The former Australian Wheat Board, which has endured several years of negative publicity for its involvement in the Iraqi oil-for-food scandal, said the retention payments scheme stemmed from the "unprecedented challenges" faced by AWB.

"These included the loss of the single desk (where AWB controlled exports of Australian wheat production), the opening up of bulk wheat exports to other companies, uncertainty regarding whether the company would be able to reform its dual-share structure, and the continued threat from several class actions," AWB said in the report.

Seven key AWB executives have been named as potential beneficiaries of the retention payments if they are still with the company at the end of this year and in 2010.

For Mr Davis, that means the possibility of another $356,250 this year, and the same in 2010, on top of his existing income — which hit $2.3 million in the latest year, a rise of 35 per cent on 2007.

Mr Davis' salary increase included a near $100,000 rise in his base salary to $858,717, and a gain of almost $200,000 in bonus payments to $902,500.

While his superannuation payments fell to $90,000, his accumulated share-based payments went from $122,500 to $443,000.

Other retention payments to AWB executives if they stay with AWB include $200,000 a year for the head of its Landmark business, Graeme Jacobs, and $150,000 each for chief financial officer Philip Gentry, financial services general manager Colin Taylor and strategy manager John Russell.

AWB's former chairman, Brendan Stewart, received only $225,000 in 2008, compared with $302,899 the previous year.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
They managed to get rid of growers. Now we will see a free-for-all - very predictable. How do wheat producers feel now after surrendering control of their company?
Posted by Realist, 10/01/2009 5:25:38 PM
No-one is worth this sort of money. It's greed that drives these decisions. It's no wonder companies go broke - the profits are eaten away by high saleries and bonouses even if the company has low profits due to down turns, the excessive payouts are still given even for bad performances. No-one seems to be taking notice of the currant debarcle with the regards the state of the world economies. At present the grain growers have been fleeced again by over paid and under performing company high fliers who are only thinking of what they can get out of the companies and not what they can do to keep them viable long term.
Posted by petro, 12/01/2009 5:05:59 AM
Look what happened when growers did have control of the company - 6.5m paid to Mr Dubois and 2.2m to Mr Ravano in one year alone!! Growers now have a choice of whom they sell to and AWB is no longer grower controlled and wheatgrowers will decide whether or not to commit their wheat to them - Simple.
Posted by wheatgrower, 12/01/2009 9:25:13 AM
If you are unhappy with this sort of remuneration (and a shareholder of AWB), perhaps it is time that you gather a few people with a similar view and make it known to the directors of YOUR company. It is quite simple.
Posted by bystander, 13/01/2009 6:00:17 AM
You pay peanuts, you get monkeys. The Australian government wanted competition, well here it is: AWB must COMPETE to keep senior executives from being snapped up by the multinationals. Good going, Kevin.
Posted by wreckage, 13/01/2009 5:15:20 PM
Bystander, Small shareholders have absolutely no influence and if you care to examine the AWB Ltd notice of meeting you will note that shareholder decisions on remuneration are non binding as far as the Board is concerned. These corporate high fliers did not come down in the last shower.
Posted by Realist, 13/01/2009 6:39:38 PM
Realist, Bystander has the right idea. If you are unhappy with what is happening, either in your company, or anywhere else, you have a right and an opportunity (some would say obligation) to express your view at the appropriate time, which could be a company's Annual General Meeting. A shareholder (or a voter for that matter) can do this individually or in groups of like-minded others. To claim such action is a waste of time is to ignore history’s lessons on how acorns can grow into big oak trees. However, it does take a little effort, and it is a lot easier to simply whinge, often in ignorance of the real issues. Just for the record, I have absolutely no problem with directors of any company paying whatever remuneration they see fit, in order to carry out their responsibilities, which include delivering long-term sustainable profits to shareholders. No director in his right mind would pay any more than necessary for any product or service needed for profitable operations of a company. In fact, if any director did do this, they would, if the case was proved, be personally liable to the shareholders for any excessive payouts.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 14/01/2009 8:03:36 AM
What goes around comes around, AWB execs are now squealing over the swill in the trough, not the egalitarian, visionary people that originally put the Australian wheat export industry on the map. Frankly I think that the public company as a structure has real short comings and is inappropriate for marketing staple food.
Posted by Ken, 21/01/2009 7:09:59 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
29 December, 2008
05 January, 2009
07 January, 2009
POLL
Q: In supermarkets, do you look to see if it's Australian-grown fruit and vegetables and foodstuffs?

Yes, most of the time.
(82.5%)

Yes, sometimes.
(11.4%)

No, it's not a big issue.
(6.2%)

Total Votes: 616
Poll Date: 06 January, 2009

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...