News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Corporate farming’s many faces 

Corporate farming’s many faces

18 Sep, 2008 04:15 PM
Corporate farming. It’s the latest buzz word within the grains industry.

Despite corporate dollars being invested, however, some in the industry think the best people at growing a crop are still family farmers.

And there are a number of different models that can be used, as was outlined at a forum at last week’s Birchip Cropping Group (BCG) main field day.

Between them, the five speakers packed some serious clout, cropping over 750,000 ha and producing an estimated 7-10pc of the country’s wheat crop.

The panel members were:

• Chris Brooks managing director of Glencore grains,

• Andy McBain managing director of AACL,

• Lachlan Beaton from Warakirri,

• Local farmer, Andy Delahunty and

• Trevor Stoney, a farmer from Western Australia.

Each panel member presented a different method of investment into agriculture, from private ownership of land, leasing land, co-investing in inputs to investing outside capital into the owning and growing of grain.

Mr McBain said the concept behind AACL came about after seeing the millions poured into managed investment schemes for timber and horticulture.

“There are some good rates of returns for investors in the grains industry,” he said.

AACL supplied over $65 million to finance the cropping programs of farmers, in a model run along share-farming lines.

Mr Brooks said that his company had been attracted into the grain sector by the simple premise of making money.

“We still think the best people at growing a crop are family farmers,” he said.

“We can work with farmers on various arrangements and come up with something that is pretty attractive for them.

"But the bottom line is that we are in it to make a dollar.

"By producing a product we can market at over $300/tonne for $150/t – we can obviously do that.”

He said Glencore was involved in leasing and purchasing land that fitted specific criteria.

“We do an audit before we get into an arrangement with a farmer to see whether the proposition is attractive," he said.

“Some areas fit the bill and others don’t.

"We like the Mallee and believe it is good value.

"But we see the Western District as too dear, at $3000 an acre, and far western NSW as too risky, even at prices of $150/acre.”

Mr Beaton said that Warakirri worked on owning land and employing managers to run the properties over a wide geographic spread through NSW, Queensland and Victoria, investing equity from large superannuation funds.

As such, properties must yield an appropriate yield to compete with the wider market.

“We work on trying to get a return of 7pc on return on capital," he said.

“Any capital gain we get from rising land prices is incidental.”

The key to Warakirri’s success is the geographic spread, which Mr Beaton hopes to expand further, as well as further develop alternate income streams such as the company’s dairy interests.

Murtoa,Vic, farmer Andy Delahunty said that his family farming business was trying to model itself on corporate lines and get some economies of scale.

He said recent increases to the cropping program through leasing and share-farming arrangements had dropped the cost of production by $70/ha through efficiency gains.

While the lifestyle factor is often cited as a key factor for family farms, Mr Delahunty pointed out that the family farm structure leaves farmers poised to make returns that stand up in any market sector.

“We’re looking at making two and a half times as much per hectare as we did in 2005.

“It’s an exciting time to be involved in the grains industry.”

Mr Stoney, who crops 25,000ha over a wide area of WA, and has moved around chasing farming opportunities over the past 40 years, welcomed the influx of investment dollars into cropping, saying it gave farmers a real chance to offset their risk.

“The AACL share-farming model was the first real risk management tool we got to use, apart from spreading our program geographically,” he said.

He said that croppers must be prepared to work with outside investors and also get into the business of crop production, rather than land accumulation.

“We’ve got to make the most dollars from the enterprise, not buy more and more land – there needs to be ways to get into the industry without the monstrous amounts of capital required to buy a place.

“As an industry, we have to stop thinking of owning land and replace that with long-term access to land, whether that’s through a leasing or share-farming arrangement or whatever.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
We tried this in 4000 sq m of greenhouse horticulture. Then, via the seed the experts, said we were devastated by Potato Spindle Tuber viroid, first time ever in a commercial crop in Australia. No compensation either Fed or State. AQIS destroyed the crop and put whole farm in quarantine for many months. Then the investors tore up every contract and proceeded to sue us under TPA for misleading and deceptive conduct. The legal battle ruined us. Contracts are not worth the paper they are written on and only the very rich can afford lawyers. Beware the city investor!! Seriously we paid good lawyers to make agreements water tight. The law thrives on argument. Beware !
Posted by Roger Crook, 19/09/2008 5:50:53 AM
No matter how you dress it up corporate farming is about the dollars, not the lifestyle, not the environment. And regional communities across Australia are just starting to feel the cold reality that is economic rationalism. Globalism is an insidious disease that will eventually see us all as slaves to big business.
Posted by Bruce, 19/09/2008 6:27:59 AM
I agree with Bruce. It is time that industry and the governement start looking at the bigger picture especially in the way this corporate farming is changing the framework of rural communities. In the dairy industry, for example, some companies are paying significantly more for milk from the larger farms and so causing even more financial pressure to the smaller family farm. This practise continues to encourage this socially destructive path.
Posted by Jamie, 19/09/2008 8:40:14 AM
Corporate farming is the future. Farmers who own their own land have suffered tremendously over the last 30 years. Such farmers double their risk by owning a hopefully income-earning asset (land) and paying themselves to farm the land. Better to let super funds and corporates etc own the land and the farmer earn a good income from contract farming. That is the future of farming.
Posted by terryw, 19/09/2008 11:32:26 AM
“As an industry, we have to stop thinking of owning land".... That sounds like communism. Or serfdom. Communism didn't work in Russia, you know. Serfdom does not make a happy, confident society. To put their hearts and souls into the work farmers must have the security of land tenure.
Posted by Ted O'Brien, 19/09/2008 11:54:44 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you believe the Rudd Government has a plan for the future development of inland Australia?

Yes
(7.1%)

No
(89.4%)

Undecided
(3.4%)

Total Votes: 757
Poll Date: 14 September, 2008

Most popular articles


Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...