News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 GM canola a growth crop for Canada 

GM canola a growth crop for Canada

03 Aug, 2009 03:49 AM
GENETICALLY modified canola has become Canada's most valuable crop, is poised for more growth and is testimony to the country's innovation policy, according to a visiting Canadian grains executive.

Dennis Stephens, of the Canada Grains Council, said GM canola was introduced into Canada in 1995 as part of a government innovation policy.

Since then, the area sown to canola had increased from about 4 million hectares to almost 6 million hectares.

At the same time, the wheat area had declined from just under 12 million hectares to almost 8 million hectares.

"GM canola is often Canada's most valuable crop and has replaced wheat," Mr Stephens told the Australian Grains Conference in Melbourne.

"Why the emphasis on innovation? Geography and climate are restrictions on industry."

He said the three main prairie provinces produced 80 per cent of Canada’s grain but were a long way from export ports.

Canada would never become a lowest-cost producer so had developed niche products in higher-value areas through innovation.

"Commercialisation of innovation is critical to industry's growth," he said.

Canada's Canola Council expected canola production to rise from 9.1 million tonnes in 2006 to 15 million tonnes in 2015.

Ninety per cent of the crop was regular canola, with only 10 per cent dedicated to "designer" products.

This would change to a ratio of 75:25 within six years.

There was a downward trend in Canadian wheat due to economic changes and more use of GM technology in canola, soybeans and corn, he said.

Mr Stephens said GM wheat was "not on the table" in Canada but it was in the back of the mind of a working group which was concerned with crop research.

"We all recognise some potential [GM] yield benefits, but there are significant hurdles in the international marketplace, which makes it hard to be enthusiastic when huge markets have a zero threshold."

This was where trade policy came in, and the aim was to get Canada's regulations in order, then push to have similar policies accepted internationally.

This should create an environment to allow for introduction of GM wheat in the future, he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What's the old saying ... He who controls the technology, controls the world!!!!!
Posted by David, 3/08/2009 11:57:18 AM
It is truly amazing that so much emphasis is placed on a crop these days, that was regarded by our previous farmers as a second rate crop that 'cleans' the soil by natural fumigation. Canola oil (like soy) is not at all good for you - high in polyunsaturated fats that cause many problems (look at the weston a price foundation website for more groundbreaking information). Also, how stupid (but cunning) can these manipulators and controllers of our food system be, with those gullible farmers, that spend so much time, money and resources to grow crops that they admit are not at all easy to market and sell, due to numerous and serious consumer concerns. There is a global widescale rejection of GM crops, and it is being pushed down our throats in whatever way they can.
Posted by brett sanders, 3/08/2009 4:27:35 PM
So many figures, so many conflicting reports. I don't know about Canada, but here's how GM is travelling in America: "Perhaps the biggest issue raised by (the results of the report) is how to explain the rapid adoption of GE crops when farm financial impacts appear to be mixed or even negative." 'The Adoption of Bioengineered Crops' US Department of Agriculture Report, May 2002

Or this: "In short the 'success' of the introduction of GM crops in the US owes more to marketing hyperbole than it does to objective science and agronomic delivery." 'USDA Report Exposes GM Crop Economics Myth'

Do you reckon there might be a bit of spin going on in Canada? David, these days, it's more 'he who has the bucks controls the truth'.

Posted by John Newton, 4/08/2009 6:17:04 AM
So while these thousands of growers (90%+ of Canadian canola growers) have a detailed look at their income (after all, in most cases it is their sole livelihood) and consider the effective use of their resources to drive the best gross margin for their efforts, those commenting above are are claiming to be smarter, more moral and better informed than all these people. Very small minority, very big voice, but then, it is everyone's right.
Posted by Concerned, 4/08/2009 7:29:43 AM
Good for Canada, no good for Australia. Isn't canola a poisonous weed?
Posted by Clark Goodwin, 4/08/2009 8:19:37 AM
Isn't it interesting that one of the heart pulling pleas for sympathy from the Monsanto and co propaganda machine is that we all need GM otherwise we'll all starve. Why then is there such an emphasis and focus on growing so much canola over anything else- when it is a second rate crop, a lousy oil, and has no real food value at all??
Posted by brett sanders, 4/08/2009 10:30:16 AM
For someone who appears to know everything, it is clear you don't have a clue about modern day grain production. Canola is an important rotation crop. Canola can help reduce the incidence of many diseases such as crown rot in wheat. It has a very vigourous tap root that helps aerate the soil and works perfectly in a high residue zero till system. It also has good gross margins. Following wheat crops always have less pests and diesease after canola. Canola along with legume pulses such as chickpeas, faba beans, lupins and perenial pastures underpin sustainable production. This is not the monoculture that you often go on about.
Posted by zero till, 4/08/2009 6:12:31 PM
I'm not saying canola doesn't have a place, as it is a good soil fumigant for fungus, nematodes etc as stated above. Yes, it does have its place, but at the detriment of other crops like wheat, that is actually food and not a crap oil?

If Monsanto and co are so worried about feeding the world/food shortages, why such a massive emphasis on this crop?

I totally agree with you on the use of legumes, cereals, members of the brassica family (such as canola), and herbs such as plantain and chicory for pasture/green manures/soil building.

I don't agree with growing so much GM canola at the expense of these other crops, especially if one of the main arguments coming from the GM camp is the need for increased food supply.

Posted by brett sanders, 5/08/2009 4:19:12 PM
I guess it must boil down to this: farmers are just dumb peasants, who are susceptible to clever marketing campaigns, while people who buy organic are all brilliant individuals who are totally immune to marketing campaigns.

Yet they try to sell them something at significantly increased cost, but with no increased value.

Posted by Qlander, 6/08/2009 6:06:32 AM
Farmers are not dumb peasants. As farmers, we have the most noble and important of all occupations - not only sustaining and nourishing humanity, but being custodians and caretakers of our delicate and amazing environment.

This is a task that is massive in all regards. If we can lift our game, which many of us are currently doing, we will easily and effectively meet the many challenges that are constantly thrown our way.

GM will not be a mechanism that will help lift our game. It will only prove to complicate things even more.

Posted by brett sanders, 7/08/2009 10:58:26 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Do you think that organic food is better for your health than conventionally farmed produce?

Yes
(34.2%)

No
(57.9%)

Undecided
(7.9%)

Total Votes: 605
Poll Date: 02 August, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...